Its on firefox addon store and have 4.5+ rating

    • Alb087OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      I hope dns level blocking is less effective that browser level. Also dns level blocking cant apply cosmetic filters and give a clean view of webpages.

          • lucasmz ∞
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            @TheBigBrother Why’s that? I mean DNS has the benefit of being able to do at network level and if I could I’d do it, but I do usually keep ublock origin in my browser.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I use both cos it’s easier to use on multiple devices and it’s system-wide. So you only have to set it up in the router and you should be fine, if you are outside the home network you can always use private DNS option in android.

  • umami_wasabi
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m not going to tell you what to use instead, but how you make the judgement for yourself: audit the code yourself

    The source code is linked right there, and you don’t need trusting someone to make the call. You’re making the call. Mind you, the actual add-on installed from Mozilla Add-Ons might contains different code then what shown in the repo. I never release any add-ons so that is just a wild guess and a hint possibility this could happen.

    To give you an head start: look for URLs and any encoded strings in all files, be it Base64 or something else. And follow them to find out why there it is there, how is it triggered, etc. Same goes for encoded strings with the added question: what was encoded within.

    Still, that is just the basic, and I’m not too into JavaScript but there could be other ways of hiding information, like in an image file via steganography.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes, but we are not auditing security or cryptography implementation.

        Instead, the goal is get a sense how it works, and look for suspicious codes or have if parts hidden (encoded) and doesn’t want people to know. That’s relatively way easier than a serious audit.

        • nelson
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          I think you greatly overestimate the average person’s ability to understand even the most basic code. Let alone in multiple languages.

  • lucasmz ∞
    link
    fedilink
    3911 months ago

    @Alb087 why not use something more… trusted and probably better? ublock origin is the best around.

    • Alb087OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      I know. But i need to know is this addon safe or not as it have more users and rating. Don’t know it based on which adblocker syntax.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Okay you asked the question, got the answer, and are clearly not listening to what people are saying and still trying to get people to agree this one is just as good…

        Scrap this shitty freemium copycat add on and just use ublock origin.

        It seriously is not that complicated.

      • lucasmz ∞
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        @Alb087 i don’t see it having more users, or ratings? ublock origin has 7m users, this has 1m. Plus, the websites to this ad blocker you mention seem like commercial. non-open-source software, I wouldn’t doubt that this is spyware.

        • Alb087OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          But it is under GNU general public licence. Me too doubt it a spyware or not as the source code is not found anywhere.

          (Am not promoting or supporting this addon in anyway).

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2711 months ago

        Users and ratings can be bought, so reputation is important.

        Even if a piece of software is open source (which this supposedly is), it needs to be well known enough so that professionals are checking the code for vulnerabilities/ bad behaviour.

        https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/ublock-origin/

        Ublock Origin has 7 times the number of users anyways?

    • Alb087OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      I didn’t say no ublock. Just asked about this one

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          I imagine because he is curious about using something other than the default option that everyone else is using?

          Just because most people are basics doesn’t mean everyone is.

  • TFO Winder
    link
    fedilink
    1211 months ago

    Check the licence.

    If it’s not any open source licence then fundamentally not trustable.

    • Alb087OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      Why below firefox shows it under GNU GPL ?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    If you’re using Mozilla’s level of endorsement as a metric, note this prominent disclaimer on the addon’s page:

    ⚠️ This add-on is not actively monitored for security by Mozilla. Make sure you trust it before installing.

    • Alb087OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Localcdn, I still don’t care about cookies like addons have this warning too…

      • lucasmz ∞
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        @Alb087 @tavu yes, it doesn’t automatically mean it’s unsafe, but this is shady software none the less.

        I use a few extensions which also have this warning but I do because I trust them

        Pretty much everyone here is just recommending ublock origin, so just use that.