I am a firm believer that there are many privacy techniques you should focus on before encrypted messaging because they will offer you much more “bang for your buck,” things like good passwords, two-factor authentication, and even encrypted email. That said, I still believe that encrypted messaging is a critical part of a well-rounded privacy and security strategy. While the vast majority of our day-to-day conversations may be benign, it can still offer a lot of insight into who we are as people – our routines, likes, and personal thoughts. This information – mundane or not – is worth protecting.

  • hswolf
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    As always, the problem isnt using a new service or super secure app, the problem is making everyone else I talk to use said app, not happening anytime soon sadly.

  • Treasure
    link
    fedilink
    1159 months ago

    TLDR: Avoid Telegram and WhatsApp. Recommended messengers are Session, Signal, SimpleX and Threema. Honorable mention: Briar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      489 months ago

      Session should probably be avoided as well, primarily because they’ve disabled things like perfect forward secrecy and a few other security measures that probably should not have been disabled.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            89 months ago
            • The Session open group server sog.caliban.org has been permanently shut down due to the declining state and neglect of the open group ecosystem by its creators.
            • The transition from the private cryptocurrency OXEN to the public ERC-20 token SENT is criticized for favoring the project’s creators over loyal community members, leading to potential financial losses for many.
            • The author condemns the management of Session for their incompetence and dishonesty, predicting the project’s inevitable failure due to a lack of trust and proper execution.
      • Treasure
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        That’s mentioned in the article I believe. I was just trying to save some people a minute or two. :)

  • Jeena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    279 months ago

    What I like about Matrix so much is that it can be run fully on your own infrastructure, even the TURN server for VOIP, and you can build the clients from source yourself too.

    But I agree that it’s quite difficult to use. And until now only my dad and my spouse use it with me because they love me and trust me. But they both always have problems with their clients. It randomly logs out and then they have to login with the password and with the encryption key again. For a long time calling didn’t work because I misconfigured the server. Then videos were for the longest time uploaded in full size and anything longer than a few seconds would be rejected. The whole spaces thing is implemented very weirdly so it confuses them. And then the threads are even worse so we can’t use them because nobody gets how to do it.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Use Simplex Chat instead

      The downside with Simplex Chat is that there is no server side accounts

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Signal ux is much better fyi, though I accept it’s hard to roll your own. Trade offs are generally worth

      • Jeena
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        As far as I know you can’t host your own signal server which connects to their servers.

        I’m using Signal with the rest of the family and most friends.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          Yeah they killed federation, though I can’t disagree with the reason. Thankfully you don’t need to trust the server

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          You can technically set it up base on the published code, but you’d need to modify the client as well. Not like it’s Matrix or XMPP, asking you for server address upon registration. I am afraid to think how much of the server dependence is hardcoded there…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    As a long time user of Session, it is hard to believe someone would describe it as “user-friendly”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    199 months ago

    Matrix doesn’t offer disappearing messages (which I consider important for digital minimalism and cybersecurity.

    I noticed this in the article and figured I’d throw my 2 cents in. This might be a spicy take, but I actually can’t stand apps that do this.

    When I was in school I had someone harass me online with threats of violence (they spent a couple of hours insulting and threatening me) then lie to the staff that I was harassing them with even more extreme shit. The staff and other students all took their side until I logged in and showed the conversation. If the messages had disappeared I wouldn’t have been able to prove my innocence.

    I very firmly want encrypted communications for privacy (I use Signal and Matrix), but I am quite wary of purging communications automatically. That said, it’s anyone’s right to use services that auto delete and my right not to.

    I’m curious what other people’s take on this would be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Deleting messages is still a thing. If there is a message you need to preserve, take a screenshot. If you are worried that someone might think that the screenshot is fake, take a screen recording, or even better, use your phones camera to physically record your screen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        This was almost a decade ago but it was a real life issue extending online, blocking might have made the in person stuff worse. Hard to say, teenagers are awful.

        These days I simply don’t keep company I don’t enjoy so it doesn’t become an issue. I also stepped away from posting on social media at all until I recently joined Lemmy and Mastodon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      For disappearing messages to work, your conversation partner has to promise they won’t take photos of their screen, and they have to promise to use an app that actually implements the feature instead of just pretending to, and the app developers have to promise to have implemented the code to delete a message when the service says it should

      Is there actually a cryptographically-sound and physically-complete method for ensuring that a message is only legible for a temporary duration once it leaves your own device and is delivered to someone elses?

      • Gregor
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Nope, it is impossible to have messages deleted after a specific time. There is simply no way to do it.

    • tmpodM
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Yeah that’s a bummer. Signal has multi device support but only for desktop and iPad (yeah, not Android tablets), but you always need to have a master phone device.

      It’s been an issue for so long, but this is Signal, they do whatever the f they want.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      It is not like they couldn’t support it. Simplex Chat has early support and Session has supported it for a long time.

  • tmpodM
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    encrypted email

    Besides being a form of messaging (so the text somewhat contradicts itself), typical email is a deeply insecure protocol.
    In my opinion, it’s probably impossible to secure without making a new protocol or making such drastic changes that it might as well be considered one.

    Here are some key concerns regarding the usual PGP-powered encrypted email:

    • Email, at a simple level, works much akin to physical email — there’s an “envelope” containing important info regarding the communicating parties, which can’t be encrypted, otherwise the mailing servers wouldn’t know where to forward the messages. This essentially leaks a lot of metadata that can be almost as valuable as the message body itself.
    • There’s no forward secrecy — one of the best cryptography features that has become pretty much a commodity in modern systems is forward secrecy, which prevents attackers from decrypting older messages after gaining access to one of the keys.
    • While not an issue with the protocol itself, it’s the sad reality and we need to consider — most people use GMail, Outlook and the like, which ultimately need to read your emails in plaintext, for better or worse reasons (search is incredibly useful, but some big players don’t stop there of course :p).
    • Another thing is the fact that it’s incredibly easy to have an imbalance of encryption, i.e. someone is encrypting their messages, but others aren’t. With the very popular email culture of quoting (be it top or bottom posting), an unencrypted party in the the conversation can leak important information.
    • PGP is… peculiar, so to speak. I has a lot of issues, mostly stemming from its age (which could also be a source of robustness and security, due to being very battle-tested, but I don’t think that’s quite the case with PGP/GPG), tries to do too much and typically has a clunky UI, which impedes wider and proper adoption by less technically people.

    This isn’t to say people should definitely stop using and promoting encrypted email, since it can be useful.
    It’s just it gives, more often than not, a false sense of security and can lead less proficient users to send sensitive data through this medium which isn’t nearly secure enough for such use cases. Preferably, people with such threat models should opt for better alternatives, most suggested in that article (such as, but definitely not limited to, Signal, SimpleX, Matrix+Olm, XMPP+OTR/OMEMO, sharing files via MagicWormhole, encrypting with tools like age).

    On a slightly tangential note, I think someone should make a Matrix client with an email client interface. I started working on a new traditional chat client (completely nonfunctional still, very much in-dev), but I’ve been honestly thinking more and more about making one looking like an e-mail client, where there isn’t much focus on instant room-based chats, but rather on longer-lived 1-to-1 and list-like exchange of messages.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    We’ve been on simplex for a few months, I like it quite a bit. We made diff accounts for each device and added them all to a group.

    Notifications arrive reliably on graphene (no google services), and KDE connect.

    I don’t love the desktop client and wish I could change text size and scaling. I was able to message the dev about it in simplex and got replies which was cool

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Sad that Wire wasn’t mentioned. I think its the only one that encrypts everything, allows anonymous accounts (no phone number needed!), and has independent clients on all platforms (no mobile app install required, but they have one) that seamlessly syncs messages on all clients

    Oh, and its free and open-source.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It has all the features I mentioned?

        Is there a desktop client that doesn’t require you to signup with a mobile app?

        Edit: just tried to download it, but I couldn’t find any release signature file. Thats not a good sign.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Yeah, its getting pretty crusty. I think they laid off like 80% of their staff and made a hard fork of the app and never put the new version in f-droid.

        They really need to fix that…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      I loved it but had to let go because too many times messages didn’t deliver using different devices, different networks, different recipients. This is over years of trying. I really wanted it to work but sadly that was a big reason to stop trying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Huh, been using it for years and never had that issue. I do have some people complain about notifications, but not lack of delivery

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      Matrix is the worst option when it comes to avoiding metadata. A group chat with users on 10 different servers will create ten different places to store the metadata with no way for any user to delete or edit this metadata. Its a privacy nightmare.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          All decentralized protocols have this issue. The servers need to handle metadata for chat groups, like who is part of which group. If the servers are under individual control, nobody can force them to delete this data. The question is, do you trust a non profit organisation like signal to minimize and delete metadata (which court orders have proven they do) or do you trust all individuals of a group chat to do the same when you manually ask them to.