• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8311 months ago

    That’s a clever joke. I however have radical freedom!

    Chooses to put the book outside

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3711 months ago

    When I was like 7 my mom bought me a choose your own adventure book. I tried to read it cover to cover and was very confused.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      So if you read it cover to cover, what did you think the instructions were about? What about the “turn to page X” parts?

      I’m not judging - this is exactly the sort of oblivious thing I would’ve done as a kid too - but I’m curious how it happened.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1511 months ago

        I specifically remember doing this with one of the goosebumps choose your own adventure. There was a good ending page that referenced nirvana (the idea not the band) and I read that thing end to end choosing both choices for everything. No page ever sent you to it. It was just a contrivance that you were sent to glance at while flipping through.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    711 months ago

    I am disappointed in how long it took me to see the joke, but its a good one! I’m gonna have to go with page 72.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    If it is all predetermined, why is it nobody can predict events? And before any “psychics” chime in, even crapshooter rolls a 7 sometimes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      In order to simulate the future of the universe, one would need a computer that could store every bit of data required to express the state of the universe, plus anything required to handle any temporary calculations and then extra if you want to store anything about that simulation.

      There is only one such device known to exist: the universe itself. And it doesn’t store any simulation history, though you can figure out some things by examining the current state.

      We could simulate a smaller portion of the universe, but you still need to store every bit of information about the current state and things would diverge anyways because you won’t be perfectly simulating the edges and those differences would cascade throughout the whole thing eventually.

      That state for Earth would still take an earth amount of matter to store. But ok, let’s say we repurpose Jupiter to be a perfect Earth simulator at least until the edge differences mess it all up, plus it has a ton of extra matter to store useful information about the simulation. First thing you’ll need to do once it’s ready is initialize it with the current state of Earth.

      But, there’s a problem: how do you measure every single thing about something without the earlier measurements changing the later ones? You can’t measure something without interacting with it in some way. Even if you just look at it, it changes (though it’s not your eyes that change it, it’s the light that bounced off of it to get to your eyes). That change is miniscule for direct affects on us, but it’s very relevant at a perfect simulation level of detail.

      The universe might be deterministic (I don’t think there’s any real way to determine this for sure either way, like what would be different if it was or wasn’t?), but it’s not prederministic, at least not from within.

      Maybe there’s some kind of mechanism to see a reflection from the future or something like that, but even then, what would happen if someone saw themselves walk through the left door in the future but when the moment came walked through the right door instead?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Even a mirror can only reflect so much of what faces it being as it is a manmade tool and is as such inherently limited. Ourbrains are even hamstrung by the chemicals that flow within it.

    • ✺roguetrick✺
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Well a crap shooter is most likely to roll a seven, so I dunno about your analogy.

  • BlanketsWithSmallpox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UebSfjmQNvs - Kurzgesagt - Lemmings will reee optimistic greenwashing.

    Can Free Will be Saved in a Deterministic Universe? PBS Space Time - And it’s counter argument page https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2020/11/15/free-will-video/

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/free-will-is-only-an-illusion-if-you-are-too/ - I’m glad to the coincidence regarding see my semantics point regarding ‘Free will’ being a somewhat outdated term being a key point in this article.

  • Cadenza
    link
    fedilink
    2111 months ago

    One cauld rightfully argue “determination” and “predetermination” are wildly different concepts. The comic is wrong on this. But let’s go page 72 anyway