It is soo good. A tech company i just got offer from. In their onboarding app, they let me join the union on the first day.

This is what you see in the company with strong union.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Fuck apple and it’s “AI powered” battery charge protector for my laptop that says it’ll stop it at 80% (or 85%?) based on your usage habits, but always charges it to full because fuck your battery. I’d bet money they don’t give you the option to permanently set it and not be AI driven because they know the battery dies sooner because their AI battery manager sucks.

        I may be triggered.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1511 months ago

          No, they give you the option to cap the charge percentage at 80% but you’ll need to buy iPhone 15 to get it 🙃

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m specifically talking about macbooks.

            My laptop is of course at 100% despite what this says, plugged into my wall outlet, like usual.

            • Midnight Wolf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              That means your battery (which can hold 94% of its original specified charge) is at 100% of 94%. Not indicating 94% and never going higher (because the 6% is unable to hold a charge). What it can hold, is full, so 100%.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I understand how to read.

                Ignore the 94% it’s the part below it.

                It’s supposed to stop charging my battery at 80%. It (edit: almost) always charges my battery to 100% despite the setting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3511 months ago

    If the employer if promoting a union, its probably somewhat in their pocket. Its just an extension of HR. I used to use the printer in the same room as my workplace HR and the union rep would constantly be insulting employees behind their backs to them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3011 months ago

    Only time this hasn’t happened to me in my “career” years was employment with US companies. But they still had enterprise agreements approved by the government ensuring we didn’t end up like…well…US citizens

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      I like to tell Libertarian types that even if European systems aren’t perfect they still have material results. If they want people to buy into their Austrian mindset they need to deliver more to get votes to further de regulate. Fortunately corporations short term thinking means that ideology will never have popular good will.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 months ago

        I disagree that it was needless due to how many people don’t understand that they have a right to join or form a union. The fact that it can be read as either providing an opportunity or as the company granting permission seemed like the perfect opportunity to reinforce the importance of seeing unions as a right.

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          Not disagreeing with you, unionization is a right and needs to be treated as such, including in the language we use around it. But don’t some unions not allow you to join immediately? Like you have to work there 30 days or something first? That’s how I read this

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            That is not disagreement since it is another example. As you pointed out, the union is the one who makes those decisions, not the company.

  • harc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6911 months ago

    This is most often an effect of collective bargaining between unions and the company, not their gesture of goodwill. Teleperformance, a massive global shared service was recently forced to do that by Uni Global Union.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    No joke, I see this becoming more common. They’re even doing it the way I imagined: straight up integrated with onboarding.

    Maybe it’s an outspoken prediction, that in the future many more businesses will prefer a unionized workforce, but I think a number of current societal and market vectors would suggest that trend. In particular, consider the variety of HR-related logistics, liabilities, and relational concerns of a modern business that amount to operational overhead. You can likely imagine ways that unions might simplify, stabilize, or fully externalize that friction, such that the increased productivity outweighs higher labor expenses, similar to the way efficiency wages in labor economics can ultimately reduce turnover related expenses. That’s just one way unions could become an attractive solution to employers and employees alike.

    At any rate, it’s what I would prefer if I needed to hire W2s, to the extent that I’d be willing to help spin up local chapters if necessary, and it only takes a handful of successful examples to accelerate labor trends.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      Seriously in Europe many investment funds activly go to the unions and ask which problems the company have. They are often better informed and honest then the normal management. They also have an obvious intresst in keeping the company around.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        That is fascinating. It makes a lot of sense. They’re safe to point out when the emperor has no clothes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      Unions have long made businesses run better. They don’t fight unionization efforts because of profit. They do it because of control.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        At the expense of profit? If control is preferable to operational stability, why do so many businesses use IT vendors?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          They still have a leaver on outside vendors. And yes, power is ultimately their goal. If there’s a conflict between power and profit, they choose power.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            OK just so we’re crystal, I’m only interested in fixing what’s broken. I have no time for doomerism, tedious conspiracies, or despair.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              What I’m saying is that you can’t go to businesses and say “a union will make this whole place run better for everyone” and expect them to take that for an answer. Unions have to fight. Some of those fights have been bloody.

              That’s not doomerism, tedious conspiracies, or despair. It’s what has happened already in the history of unions.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Edit: You’re angry, hurt, jaded, and need others to feel your misery. I understand the feeling. What comes next, however, is the work. Angsty rage-baiting is a dead end.

                Of course, union battles are a matter of history. And yes, today the rational agents of global economies often see unionization as a threat, clearly.

                I argue that it’s only a threat insofar as it’s a disruptive paradigm. On the whole it’s a more fiscally advantageous schema for all but the monolithic “vertically integrated” international corporations that profit largely from self-dealing (and probably need to be broken up anyway).

                You said businesses prioritize “Control” and “Power” over profit — i.e. they are not rational economic agents but despots. It’s a bleak perspective since despots can’t be reasoned with, only overthrown, and moreover it dismisses economic theory entirely.

                I’m just weary of the defeatism. I know we’ve been through a lot and many of us are terribly jaded, but giving up is not an option. I want to win.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  moreover it dismisses economic theory entirely.

                  Yes.

                  I’m just weary of the defeatism

                  I don’t see it as a defeat. I’m not saying give up. I’m saying know what we’re up against.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Unions help to fight inflation and price gouging as well. Unions are good for the entirety of any economy in which they exist. There are decades upon decades of independent and government funded research that supports this.

        https://theconversation.com/unions-do-hurt-profits-but-not-productivity-and-they-remain-a-bulwark-against-a-widening-wealth-gap-107139

        https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/labor-unions-and-the-us-economy

        https://www.epi.org/publication/unions-and-well-being/

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        It’s important to remember that “they” is specific people with varying goals. Similarly, merely saying “profit” doesn’t tell us anything about where the money is going.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3011 months ago

    I got a job once that required me to join the union. It was bagging groceries part time for minimum wage at a grocery store. Sorry I don’t mean to be a downer, I see union membership as a good thing. Unions are like democracy. They are only as good as the people they are made of.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      Yeah, my brothers first job in a grocery store, sane thing. He was required to join a union and the dues taken out of his pay, despite being part time minimum wage for the summer . All the union benefits were for full timers, so it was basically stealing money from people who could least afford it.

      I’m generally pro- union but for sure there are some taking advantage

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Yeah I didn’t work there very long. It was 1984 and unemployment was 10%. Being fresh out of high school I took whatever I could find

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      Yeah, I got really screwed by Pepsi and their “union”. Overall though, unions are great and we need more of them to combat shit employers. Just don’t let your union reps be company men…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m sure the union rep made it sound like you must, but I wonder if you were actually required. The major US grocery chain I worked for, the union shoved themselves down your throat but it was NOT required. It felt to me that their negotiations amounted more to collusion than actually fighting for the workers. I hope they’re the weakest union in the history of the world and that they don’t all suck as badly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Yeah, that could be the difference - I definitely lived in a right to work state. But they certainly sold it even there as if you must join.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        It depends on the state. Some states don’t have right to work laws, meaning that you can be forced to join a union to work a certain job. Unions are great ideas but some of them really do suck. My ex was sexually harassed repeatedly by her manager at a grocery store and the union reps told her to take a compliment and quit complaining.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        The way I remember it (40 years ago) the manager told me joining was required but I could be wrong. It was an awful union. Former employees were suing the union and grocery store chain for how bad they were screwed over

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Why tf would you ever join a union for a minimum wage? What are they even doing for you in that case beside making you actually make less than minimum wage now after you pay your dues.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          A lot of times it is another way to “pay your dues”. Once you’re “in” the union, you probably get preferential treatment for higher level full time jobs…

          I e. The company has to hire union workers first.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          Things like sick pay, time off, healthcare etc.

          My buddy kept a shift a week at the grocery store from his teens to 30s just for the benefits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      The only thing that would be less G-money than that would be if the job was in H-town.

      Nah, I J/K.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Hopefully they don’t make OP’s next 3 years all about some powerful woman and her secret project only to kill her and not resolve any of the mystery