• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1082 years ago

    Over the past year, Meta has hired dozens of Twitter employees

    LOL, you mean all those employees you unceremoniously fired?

    • aeternum
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      I’m sure twatter would have a no compete clause if they could. Maybe they can?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        392 years ago

        IANAL, but from what I understand, you can put anything you want in a contract, but it doesn’t mean it’s enforceable.

        So the reason why companies put in non-compete clauses is mostly because people believe it, not because it’s really enforceable.

        Now if former twitter employees were still getting severance from Twitter while working at Meta, that could be an issue. But generally speaking, if you’re not getting money (consideration) non-compete clauses don’t matter much.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          152 years ago

          Most severance is paid in a lump sum.

          And if they laid you off or fired you, there’s no way they can enforce a no compete clause.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          402 years ago

          In most regions, you’re right: you can put a noncompete in a contract, but enforcing it is another matter.

          But noncompete clauses are explicitly illegal in California, where Twitter is based.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 years ago

        Noncompetes are basically unenforceable in California, you can make people sign them but they’re about as useful as if they were made out of toilet paper

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        I think that it is also different if you get fired. Don’t know in detail, but I assume that if they fire you without a valid cause they don’t have any grounds to complain that you did a sensitive and unique work.

  • Carlos Solís
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Imagine if the future of Threads was, uh, hanging by a thread during the upcoming Suck vs Elmo cage match

  • Frog-Brawler
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Yea, well Disney should sue X-Corp on IP infringement. X-Corp was tied to the X-Men and mutants until Musk decided he would steal that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -122 years ago

          You don’t see the conflict?

          Here it’s a case of hypocrisy, as it’s a conflict between berating someone else for some behavior, and engaging in it ourselves.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            162 years ago

            You’re making a false equivalence. Musk is scared about losing more of his money. People here seemingly don’t like Meta and don’t want it to infest lemmy. Those aren’t even close to being the same.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -72 years ago

              Or, Musk’s actions could be in line with protecting free speech. I mean, that’s the fear we have of Meta here: that it will destroy this space and silence voices.

              So if (a) Musk claims he’s protecting free speech, and then (b) takes actions consistent with that view, then there’s no opening to make an argument of the form “Must claims X but does Y”, when Y could be interpreted as a manifestation of goal X.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 years ago

        While I personally don’t, the difference between this and that is that most people here, together as a community, have decided, again together, that they don’t want to federate with Meta apps because of a long history of privacy and other abuses.

        That’s not the same thing as another billionaire pissed off because they are doing exactly what capitalism is “supposed to do”

        Do better or die is the whole philosophy no?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Oh boy, everyone should tell those Indian slaves in Dubai. They can’t hold you prisoner guys, it’s not valid if it’s not voluntary, so you can just go home. The capitalists say it’s okay…wait, what? Oh! it was the capitalists who put them there.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -32 years ago

                  An innocent person who commits a crime is no longer an innocent person.

                  A vegetarian who starts eating meat is no longer a vegetarian.

                  A capitalist who enslaves someone is no longer a capitalist.

                  I’m so sorry you have trouble with this basic definition, but capitalism is a free market system. Slaves are not free, and that economic relationship is not a free market relationship.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  From wikipedia:

                  Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.[1][2][3][4] Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price systems, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, and wage labor.

    • dub
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Something something free market something something capitalism

  • zib
    link
    fedilink
    422 years ago

    These two need to just fuck and get it over with already

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      It can be one of those erotic wrestling matches. Start off fighting, end up fucking. 2-for-1 PPV special to end all PPV specials.

    • root_beer
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      God dammit I came in here just to say that. I’m going to say the same thing about Marge Greene and Lauren Boebert but you probably already did that too ya jerk