• kamen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    568 months ago

    It’s logical if you’re the user.

    Imagine how for every one user doing this deliberately there are nine who pause a video and forget it in the background, wasting bandwidth in the process.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Is bandwith that expensive nowadays? I feel the argument is valid but was implemented when bandwidth was way more expensive.

      I mean, if I upgrade my home internet box to the 40€ tier I’ll have 10Gb symmetrical.

      Edit: there are a lot of google fanbois here lol

      • kamen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Like others mentioned - yes, I mean the bandwidth from the perspective of the one providing the service. For the same bandwidth that someone watched 10% of a video, paused it and never watched the remaining 90%, you can show those same 90% to someone else who’d actually watch it. That’s without counting the small overheads here and there, but hopefully you get the idea.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Well, if they didn’t push trash with their algorithms, maybe people would finish more videos.

          • kamen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            Tell this to them, not to me. Moreover I’m not talking about a specific site but rather about the general technical implications you’d have if you’re hosting something.

      • Melmi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That 10Gb link is almost certainly oversubscribed, though. You don’t actually have 10 Gb of dedicated constant bandwidth, you just have access to 10Gb of potential bandwidth. You’re unlikely to saturate that link very often, so you won’t notice, but it’s shared with other people.

        It’s different from Google or any other company paying for bandwidth that’s being actually used, not just a pre-allocated link like your home internet.

      • Trailblazing Braille Taser
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        It’s not that bandwidth is incredibly expensive, it’s more that it’s a limited resource, videos are huge, and there’s a gajillion users.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        238 months ago

        It’s not about your bandwidth, it’s about YouTube’s bandwidth. You probably don’t care, but for them it adds up to a lot

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You showed your home bandwidth. It means absolutely nothing in this discussion.

            How often do people watch the first few seconds of a video and not finish it? It happens a lot. It probably happens a lot more often than that user actually finishing it. We could be talking about doubling Google’s bandwidth requirement. Not to mention server CPU time, disk I/O. Do you have any idea how expensive the operational costs of YouTube probably are as it is? This is an efficiency game to successfully run a video platform which supports up to high bitrate 4k video at this unfathomable scale, servicing the entire planet.

            It makes the most efficient sense for them to only let you buffer a little bit at a time, not more than you need.

            I’m not kissing Google’s ass. I’m just pointing out that if you want the service to exist, it has to be designed as efficiently as possible, otherwise it won’t exist for long.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218 months ago

    Modern ABRs are actually quite sophisticated, and in most cases you’re unlikely to notice the forward buffer limit. Unstable connection scenarios are going to be the exception where it breaks down.

    For best user experience it’s of course good practice to offer media offlining alongside on demand, but some platforms consider it a money-making opportunity to gate this behind a subscription fee.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      My internet is intermittently like 100mbps and 256kbps. It sees the 100mbps and acts like it’s going to be that way forever, so doesn’t buffer the whole video while it has the fast speed, then drops entirely when it slows down.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        An ABR is generally going to make an estimate based on observed bandwidth and select an appropriate bitrate for that. It’s not out of the question that you run out of forward buffer when your bandwidth takes a nosedive, because the high bitrate video is heavy as all hell and the ABR needs to have observed the drop in bandwidth before it reconsiders and selects a lower bitrate track.

        I’m not familiar with ABRs affecting the size of the forward buffer, most commonly these are tweaked based on the type of use-case and scaled in seconds of media.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      If that were true then users wouldn’t hate and complain about it. This post existing is proof that it’s shit because clearly it’s not as seamless as you’re making it out to be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        The thing is that you can’t notice when it’s working on account of how seamless it is. Yes, sometimes it breaks down, but these are the exceptional cases.

    • mle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      And then there is youtube which just discards the whole buffer content each time an ad plays. Very sophisticated. Although knowing google that behavoir is likely on purpose

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        I’ve been running adblockers since the beginning of time so I can’t speak to this behavior. Spontaneously it seems a bit amateurish, though.

  • Kairos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 months ago

    They do that to punish people with slow internet. Use yt-dlp instead

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    What I did was open 4 videos and go to the next tab when one started buffering

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    40
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I used to be able to load up a bunch of videos in different tabs. Close the laptop and drive into the bush to watch shit and smoke a joint.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    278 months ago

    I wanna go back to the wild west days of the internet where no one ever got banned for trolling or shitposting.

    The censorship gestapo has started to ban shitposters from shitposting subs here on lemmy. That’s how oversensitive everyone is now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 months ago

      In the “wild west” days there was a certain “terrorists handbook” circulating with detailed instructions on how to make all sorts of things.

      I’m very happy that sort of thing isn’t easily available to everyone anymore.

      Trolling then and “trolling” now are just not the same. The meaning behind the word has evolved to mean something malicious. Trolling back then meant more like a practical joke. Like telling a noob alt+f4 will give them buffs in a game.

      But you’re trying to compare a time where the internet had few million of users rather than a few billion ones.

      Oh, and people got banned ALL THE TIME before too. I don’t know if you remember mud’s or IIRC. But I do. Banning annoying people was very common. Certainly ain’t nothing new. Behave or gtfo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        You can still readily do the old school trolling without repercussions as well. So I don’t get the nostalgia either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          Been a very long time since I’ve seen this in digital form. I really thought it would be more difficult to find this these days.

          Thought I didn’t really look for it either I suppose.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I remember when I first ran into this. It was on a BBS. It felt like forbidden knowledge. It felt like this was a big secret.

            But now that I’m not an edgy teenager anymore, I realize it’s just a library book. The trouble with getting older, is you learn how to organize the world so it feels smaller

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              I can’t exactly say I’ve seen it in my local library. I remember this being circulated and just really hoped that the idiots in my class wouldn’t blow their hands off.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        That information is exactly as easy to get as it was then. It’s always taken just a bit of curiosity and a touch of internet know-how

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 months ago

        In the “wild west” days there was a certain “terrorists handbook” circulating with detailed instructions on how to make all sorts of things.

        Do you mean the anarchist’s cookbook or the CIA field manual? Because both are still quite accessible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 months ago

      Sounds like someone wants to openly use bigoted language without repercussions on privately-owned social media platforms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The problem is culture changed. How far people were willing to push it 10xed and 100xed. I’ve been on free speech forums like Voat, then Ruqqus. But people are just too nasty to behave, and then not enough “normies” come to drown them out. You’re left with a hate fueled, self censoring circlejerk.

      (Same applies to allowing full shitpost ability on larger sites, just in smaller corners)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    If you’re on Windows download potplayer and copy video links to one in potplayer

    If you wait potplayer will buffer the entire video or a good chunk of it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    408 months ago

    I used to queue videos up the night before, then be able to watch them on the ride to school. Then one day you couldn’t do that anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 months ago

      It took like an hour for an image of the Ultra 64 (N64) controller to load on my screen from the reveal in Japan. I remember waiting as each line of the image would slowly appear on a grey scale laptop screen over dial up. My eleven year old mind was blown, worth it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 months ago

      There use to be a feature in Internet Explorer where you could download a local copy of a webpage and specify how many links deep you wanted it to go. It maxed out at 5, which would grab the entirety of any fansite I pointed it at.

  • Psychadelligoat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    118 months ago

    I thought the connection I was on before was pathetic dog shit (moved rural and went from 1g to 100mbps up/down at both) and the only issues I ever had was specifically peacock because that app is designed to work just poorly enough that I’ll struggle with it

    Literally haven’t thought about video buffering since like… 2014, 2013? Unless of course my Internet drops out. And that includes on mobile devices

    I shudder to think what y’all are running on

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 months ago

      The secret is that 90% of the time for 90% of people, the current method of “just in time” buffering works as good or better. Especially if you’re on your phone you don’t want to be paying for buffering data far into the future.

      But the 10% of the time that it DOESN’T work when it usually does, really sticks in your brain so everyone has the experience of it not working now.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Just download the video then.

    Youtube stop doing this because people would pause a Multi-Hour long video (such as a music video) download the entire thing, only to then only watch 15 minutes of it because that’s the bit they wanted. Massive waste of bandwidth

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        People stitch together what is essentially a play list of music videos because YouTube’s actual playlist feature kinda sucks. Has something to do with longer videos, engagement and ad revenue too but I’m not privy to that Eldritch knowledge.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          I guess. I don’t know why anyone would watch a 2 hour compilation for 3 videos though.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            “Lo-fi beats to study to”

            Lots of people just need filler music while doing something for several hours, yt playlists are ass, picking a new song every 2-9 minites is quite disruptive, and any form of autoplay will eventually dump you in alt-right politics.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            You’ve never seen a Video DJ mix before? They can go on for several hours and have more than just 3 songs—usually a dozen or more—all mixed seamlessly into one continuous mix with no gaps between songs. And if the person who made the mix is a real DJ, the songs are also BPM- and Key-matched with each other, which sounds absolutely amazing when done right. It’s one of the better ways to enjoy music.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      Now after the second commercial I hit a youtube downloader from a European vpn. I still download it all just to watch what I want.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      What’s going on with YouTube video downloading? Any route I take to try to download, it only gives me the option of 1080p video only and a different option for audio only. I’ve recently downloaded a couple of videos my kids watch for offline use and I had to put the downloaded files into a video editor to combine the audio and video myself.

      Here’s one video I wanted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O2g3Ql3nRU

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      268 months ago

      What do you mean “waste of bandwidth”? We’re paying for that through government subsidies and selling our personal data. Are you seriously defending a corporation that made $250 billion last year in ad revenue alone?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        188 months ago

        This is a weird point. Like yes, Google is a government subsidized monopoly. But to keep this feature is a massive waste of resources.

        Like from a tech perspective, this should not be done. Like fuck Google can be a thing and will have no impact on that

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          108 months ago

          People hate corporations so much that they forget some times they do make smart choices. That bandwidth doesn’t just exist from nothing, it’s electricity being moved around. The environmental impact, even as infinitesimal as it may be, isn’t worth the convenience imo

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 months ago

        Defending no explaining yes.

        Need to chill out not everything you do not understand needs to be an argument.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        Even if it was 3 cents in bandwidth (it’s not), that’s 1.3 billion dollars in additional costs. You want more ads to pay for that?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And thats probably a rounding error in googles costs.

          For a much more usable, enjoyable experience.

          That you’re arguing against, because wont someone think of poor googles downtrodden finances.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 months ago

            Billion dollar costs aren’t rounding errors even at YouTube/Google’s scale. They’re a measurable percentage of total revenue. I agree that it slightly improves the user experience, it’s hard to imagine a worse cost/benefit tradeoff from an engineering perspective even at more realistic costs. It’s especially hard to justify when there’s an easy alternative for users in the form of downloading videos.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      The amount of times my video brings unplayable even though it has a few minutes buffered is too damn high. Almost all the times my video gets stuck, is that scenario. Not to say it happens all the time.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1138 months ago

    Also clicking on some previous segment and NOT having the video load again. Idle for too long and the video unloads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1608 months ago

    Letting the entire video buffer is the same as downloading the entire video which you can still do. My favourite tool is yt-dlp

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      348 months ago

      It’s a pretty great tool. Downloaded the entirety of Murder Drones on Saturday to add to my Plex server. Strictly for preservation, going to re-watch on YouTube to support them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Beat me to it (by several hours).

      I’m not watching on YouTube. If I want to watch, I’ll download it first. yt-dlp on the desktop, seal (yt-dlp underneath) on android.

      Edit: Big finger problems

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Wow, Seal is very much improved since I last looked at it. It has a million options, and custom commands and everything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 months ago

      You can also setup a script to automatically download a channels latest vid so you don’t need to check the website anymore.

      • (⬤ᴥ⬤)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        fun fact: according to sponsorblock, youtube is testing ads that are baked serverside into the video. so one day even downloading might not be ad free

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          208 months ago

          They will never be able to block me just using the mouse to skip forward. If its already downloaded theres zero buffer lag.

          I will create another step that converts the format to an open one if they somehow block that too.

          Its an accessibility thing for me. Ads literally cause me harm. They cannot possibly win me over i’ll just end up doing something productive instead.

        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          It will be detectable as per US law. Ads must be marked.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          For now you can use vpns to certain countries that don’t have ads at all, I expect that will still work to avoid server side ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    188 months ago

    It sucks for livestreams on youtube too, since it only starts downloading the next chunk of video when it’s almost done playing through the current chunk and if you experience a hiccup, then youtube’s solution is to send you back in the livestream (amount depends on latency setting of the streamer) so instead of getting a nice live stream, you could be going back as far as around 20 seconds in the past, so if you want to participate then you’re going to be that slow on your reaction. Instead of waiting for the full 5 seconds of the buffer to play through before downloading the next chunk, I wish they’d query for the next chunk before then and not only that, but if there’s a hiccup, don’t send the stream back by so much, because also if you fall too far behind then it skips ahead. It’s all over the place.

    • invalid_display_name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      When it does that I usually set the speed to x2 to catch up. I’m surprised that setting is still there, I don’t know of any other use for it in a live stream