• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I haven’t been using Firefox for Android because I heard they don’t have a WebView Implementation so the firefox browser has to be used beside the Chromium WebView meaning there’s an attack surface of two browser engines. I also heard that the Firefox sandboxing and site isolation isn’t very good between websites.

    I’ve been using Vanadium WebView and browser because of that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Android System Webview allows apps to display browser windows in the app rather than taking you to your web browser app. On Android, chromium is used for webview. If you use Firefox as a default browser, the remote attack surface increases because they’re two different browsers with different security issues.

        Site isolation enforces security boundaries around each site using the sandbox by placing each site into an isolated sandbox. Firefox doesn’t have that feature so they’re vulnerable to attacks like Spectre.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      622 years ago

      Let’s just appreciate the fact that basically no other browser has this.

      With chrome/ium you can’t even block ads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        That’s a lie sir. Brave blocks ads out of the box. Vivaldi also has ad block filters. You can add custom filters to both browsers. Also edge has shitty ad blocker. Kiwi browser supports almost all chrome extensions. Basically almost all except chrome and still you can block most of the ads using correct dns server.

        • Forkk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Firefox already supported ublock origin on mobile and a handful of other extensions. This is just them opening it up to more extensions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          172 years ago

          We’re talking about actual web browsers here, not spyware that uses your device to run a botnet

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Firefox is as much botnet as others. Full of telemetry, diagnostics, pocket and other shit. That’s why there are secure forks. Firefox in stock form is as much botnet as others. Also firefox is selling out to the same google so don’t pretent it’s better because it’s not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          Sorry but even with all that said, you’ll never lure me to the evil side. I’m sticking with Firefox until it dies an atrocious death

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    My goodness that’s awesome. I never understood why they locked it down in the first place about a year ago. What changed?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      They wanted to have compatibility with Chrome extensions. But that was all just a n EEE move by Google. More perfidious since they created the open standard in the first place

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    512 years ago

    I use FF on android for a couple months now. Solid browser and sync to desktol and add blocker are nice.

    BUT: their page reloading is far too aggressive. You can’t buy anything online, since once 2FA is required and you need to open your bank app, confirm, and switch back, the page reloads and the 2FA didn’t get through. Tickets and such are the only reason I have still chrome installed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Huh, good to know.
      I’ve found edge to be quite aggressive on the reloads as well (at least, on desktop).
      Makes it difficult for developing anything that has to deal with tabs going to “sleep” (like websocket reconnects, rehydrations, reauths).

      I’m a hair away from ditching chrome

    • 1ird
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I feel this pain. But you try to stop a video that started playing in Firefox. I dare you.

        • 1ird
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yes but a video should stop if you swipe away the apps card from multitasking view. This action is tantamount to closing the app.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Mine stop maybe because i have background battery restriction/autostart prevention. Not sure tho

            • 1ird
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Strange. I’ll look into those settings. Thanks

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I checked this with youtube now and it pauses the video as soon as its in the background and I can play from notifications. Try updating too btw

          • NarendraCzar
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            The video pauses atm of swiping away from the recent deck something magical is happening with your phone i use lineageos btw

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hmm, I’m not experiencing that. Could Android (well, the flavour used by your phone) be killing background apps too aggressively or something like that?

      Edit: could also be a RAM thing. I have 12GB.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          You can get 32GB of laptop RAM for like $60 to $80 if you find sales, and even one 16GB stick would be an upgrade for you. Modern bloat is so bad that having 8 gigs of RAM is the equivalent of having 4 a few years ago.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        I’m not experiencing that issue either and I have half the amount of RAM that you do. I’ve noticed an unnecessary autorefresh only after closing out of the browser for a long time, never in the middle of switching between apps. But, that does sound like annoying behavior.

      • GreatAlbatross
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Possibly, but previously I’ve been able to load a site, open a media-rich page in a new tab, then close that tab to go back to the original page.

        On a newer build of FF for Android, that first page is re-loaded from the internet.

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I also feel RAM too aggressive since A13, but it could be my custom ROM as well.

    • ItsTom87
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      Maybe they couldn’t guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That’s what I’ve always assumed.

      • Skull giver
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        The mobile version did actually run all addons up to Firefox 68. Quite well, actually! There were some issues with addons that assumed a certain part of the UI existed that wasn’t present on mobile, but those have become irrelevant since Firefox dropped the old XUL addons.

        Then they rewrote the entire browser, with only a few functioning addons on a whitelist, and did basically nothing for addon support for four years. I think they added two or three addons to the standard whitelist over the years, but that’s it. The rewrite also introduced some silly bugs (still can’t paste an IPv6 URL into the address bar to visit it, no https://[2000:1234:4566::]/ for you unless you click on a link to it) but development seems to have mostly been focused on themes and design from what I can tell.

        I know there was the whole XUL-to-webextension thing going on around that time, but I never found out why the rewrite restricted users so much. The rewrite also included the change to make about:config available only on unstable (beta/nightly) versions. You can install other addons on Firefox (you create a collection on addons.mozilla.org, open the secret settings in the beta, and point the browser at your own whitelist) and most of them work quite well, actually.

        Because the addons themselves mostly worked, I always assumed they stopped caring about addons. People would riot if they removed uBlock Origin so there are a few addons in there, but I thought they killed the concept on mobile.

      • GunnarRunnar
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could’ve just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn’t worth the headache.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      412 years ago

      Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won’t have problems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest.

        I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Are you suggesting this is bad? What was better about “old” Firefox for Android?

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        No, this is similar to the old Firefox for Android, which is why I like it.

        When you could just browse AMO and add an add-on at will. It was also much smoother.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I agree with you. This is going to be a huge improvement and hopefully get more people to switch from Chrome.

          Hopefully it’s a sign of more good things to come.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          It was also much smoother

          now that’s just rose-tinted glasses speaking. I remember how absolutely abysmal old Firefox’ scrolling was, and how they’ve claimed multiple times that they’ve improved it but it was still horribly sluggish compared to Chromium browsers. I’ve been using Firefox Preview (and then Nightly after enough performance improvements have landed on it) for about a year just to have acceptable experience on mobile.

          • katy ✨
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Honestly the one thing I don’t like is how pages constantly refresh when you alt tab (or w/e the equivalent is on Android - swipe tab I guess?). I know it’s a small thing but it just gets at me. I also like the old UI as it was more Firefox-y; the new one is too white and plain.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I do miss the tab bar, it would be great to have it on the tablet. I can’t comment on how differently the browser behaves now regarding storing loaded pages in memory though, because most of the time I’d have an underpowered phone that would kick out everything out of memory when switching apps anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For those who don’t know yet: Firefox Nightly for Android let you install any extension you desire.

    You just need to create a custom collection on the web site and link your ID in nightly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      You can also use the Nightly app and load addon collections. It’s an absolute pain in the arse, and a lot of extensions don’t work, but it’s one way to get them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I didn’t know that this feature is already dort of waring in the nightly build but it makes sence that they will test it out in nightly

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Honestly, it’s as if they don’t really want you using it. It’s a legitimate feature but hidden away and quite difficult to use. Here’s a guide on getting it set up. I’ve been using it since it came out and haven’t had too many issues, but a lot of addons just don’t work as intended.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    no need for beta anymore or are there still some restrictions in place?