• SavvyWolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    367 months ago

    Hasn’t Debian relaxed its stance and now allows you to fairly easily use nonfree software?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      237 months ago

      yes, I think the main thing is when the nonfree firmware was included (user can opt-out) as a default at install. So out of the box support for most common hardware became way better.

      It was always pretty easy to add nonfree repositories, but having to manually sort out wifi firmware after an install was a pain.

    • VindictiveJudge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yes, but it’s significantly less automatic. Testing distros on an old laptop, Debian wouldn’t support the network card out of the box and I had to use USB tethering from my phone to get the necessary drivers off the internet. Ubuntu just had them in the image and installed them automatically.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Was this with the most recent version of Debian? Bookworm includes non-free firmware with the installer now.

        • VindictiveJudge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Looking at release dates, just a couple days before Bookworm came out. I’ll have to try that one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yes this meme is dated. You can run proprietary stuff in bookworm with just a couple of check boxes.

  • RachelRodent
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    you do you. But ubuntu is the windows of linux from the perspective of telemetry, propertiary software and such. Like if ur gonna switch to linux might aswell “fully” switch

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s for when you want to get your grandparents on Linux but don’t want them to require your help every moment that they’re using it.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This is a flawed opinion. You can support a realistic approach of using proprietary software for usability’s sake without approving of things like ad profiles. (I say that instead of telemetry because benign things like crash reporting or reporting which features you use are technically also “telemetry”.)

      Listen, I support foss as much as anyone here but there’s a reason SSPL didn’t get accepted as a foss license, and it’s because it’s impossible to have a fully 100% foss system. I’m not saying we shouldn’t push for or advocate for that, just saying we shouldn’t say someone isn’t fully embracing Linux just because they need to use a few pieces of proprietary software to get a working system that supports their individual needs.

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        It’s impossible to have a fully free system?

        https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

        But more to your point, it’s a false dichotomy. Even before the latest changes to the Debian install media, for years it was maybe unintuitive but still easy enough to just choose the “nonfree” install iso. That one would automatically include all the proprietary bits that are necessary for a fully functional Linux system.

        But now those nonfree parts are in the Debian install by default, so there really is just nothing that you get from Ubuntu that can’t just as easily work in Debian - especially since everyone is moving toward flatpaks, and appimages anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      I agree about that today, but it wasn’t always so easy to install linux for noobs as it is now.

      It may be easy to forget, but Ubuntu was doing “easy jnstall” better than moat linux distros for a long time. I bet there are a lot of non-programmer-linux-daily-driver folks out there that got started on ubuntu. I’m one of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      Ubuntu has zero telemetry if you flick the switch they show you right after installation. And steam is proprietary software, yet basically every distro ships it in their repos. Your points make no sense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          I’m sure it’s not literally all of them, and it’s almost never preinstalled. But available in the repositories.

      • RachelRodent
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        it is opt out… Besides why use a distro where you are in cannonical’s mercy when you can use anything else

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          And when Mint is right there too.

          I have Ubuntu packages all through my system and I don’t need to care about whatever BS canonical is up to. Worst case scenario is I switch to LMDE one day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          97 months ago

          That’s the proprietary app container system pushed by Canonical who maintains Ubuntu. That’s as opposed to something more widely accepted like flatpak. I’m not an expert on everything Canonical has done to piss of the FOSS community, but I think snaps are the biggest one.

          And in regular old Linux Mint Cinnamon you don’t have to deal with that, and you can still lean on Ubuntu’s apt repositories.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            67 months ago

            Don’t forget that they’re buddy buddy with amazon, and have even included amazon sourced ads within the OS at one point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Ahh OK. Thanks for the info. I used flatpak on cinnamon now. I prefer KDE but its just hard to beat Mint.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              37 months ago

              I’m good with cinnamon myself, but you can totally install KDE on mint instead. It is just Linux after all.

              When I do a search for mint kde, this is the first result and has step by step instructions. It looks like it can be as simple as apt install kde-standard or kde-full.

              https://linuxiac.com/how-to-install-kde-plasma-on-linux-mint-22/

              I’m tempted, and I may mess with it some day, but honestly after tweaking some settings I’m pretty happy with how my cinnamon desktop performs.

  • s4if
    link
    fedilink
    307 months ago

    Ubuntu is no longer chad as it pushes snaps everywhere. Real chad uses native packaging only. Lol

    • Gregor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      No, snaps are epic for command-line software. No dependency hell. When I want an app, this is my order of preference: flatpak ==> snap ==> apt ==> .deb file distributed by the devs of the program

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    237 months ago

    Ubuntu supports a wider range of devices than Debian? Since when? I was under the impression that Debian supported all or nearly all architectures the Linux kernel supports, Ubuntu only a few popular ones?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      Yer it’s nonsense. The first device I switched from Ubuntu to Debian on was the SheevaPlug because Ubuntu dropped support for it. Debian still supports it now well over a decade later.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      Maybe they meant of the box. You have to add additional repos to get non-free drivers installed on Debian or install them manually.

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      AMD graphics drivers might be an example of this. They’re made by AMD for Ubuntu specifically, not Debian. They work* on LMDE, so I assume they will also work** on Debian, but they weren’t specifically developed for that platform.

      Installing them was a bit hairy, but they’ve survived at least one kernel update so far, which is somewhat reassuring***.

      * on my specific hardware.

      ** for some hardware combinations, including mine, if not all.

      *** but not completely. FrankenDebian is the word I use for it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    They are good distros for beginners. But over time some people switch to Arch-based systems or NixOS. Because of HUGE software list that you can install without much hassle, you don’t have to add 3-rd party repositories or PPAs or figure out how to install .tar.gz package in your system or how to compile from source. You just type one command to install something hard to obtain in other distros.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1147 months ago

    Use whatever fits your use case. Hell build a LFS distro. That’s why it’s YOUR computer.

    The penguin is the messiah of freedom.

  • Buglefingers
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What if I want both? Is there a ububian? Or a debuntu?

    Edit: /j

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In principle yes, as Ubuntu is derived from Debian Sid, but with modifications to make it stable. Thus, the sources they are built from are different and hence, not completely binary compatible, like e.g. *Ubuntu and Mint or Debian and LMDE are. The configuration settings different also here and there and thus, guides for Ubuntu are not 1:1 transferable to Debian and vice versa.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      497 months ago

      Are the Ubuntu ads in the room with us right now? The only thing I remember is apt telling you about Ubuntu Pro. At that point Plasma is adware too for advertising their donation page.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Ah yes. Complaining about the minimal version of the distro not being minimal due to a 2.6mb package. Canonical is a true monster.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            77 months ago

            You gave a snarky response implying that there aren’t ads on Ubuntu and they replied with confirmation from a developer that they’ll be forcing ads on ubuntu.

            Are you still arguing that canonical isn’t serving ads on Ubuntu? Or are you just being an ass because you were proven wrong?

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              There are no ads on Ubuntu. The terminal reminding you that Pro exists is not an ad. Or do we consider Plasma as having ads now? I read that they will be asking their users to donate once a year.

              • Dragnansia
                link
                fedilink
                8
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Okay, let’s compare KDE and Ubuntu, as I understand it.

                From what you said, the terminal reminds you than a Pro version exist, and that you can buy it. => This is a ads, they try to sell their product to you.

                More question for the Ubuntu parts:

                • How often does this happen ? Just once a year ?

                KDE send a notification once a year to say they need donation, help for translation, coding, writing documentation, and more. => This is not a ads, this is a message to get help and donations, and only once a year.


                If you don’t see the big difference between the two things, i don’t know how to make it more clear with other words.

                I don’t use Ubuntu, and if some parts are wrong, I wait for corrections !

                • Ekky
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  47 months ago

                  I guess you could also ask: “Does the pro-tier give one any options/additional functionality that the non-pro/non-donation tier doesn’t?”

                  Obviously, if you have to pay for additional functionality (like settings/themes/updates) then it isn’t a simple ask for donation. Though, I’d argue to ignore trivialities such as “thank you”-emails and possibly a small visual-only token on the program that you paid/donated, as those barely count as “functionality”.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I remember that one. The applet that lead to amazon with their referral code. From what I heard from Alan Pope, it did bring in money, but even the manufacturers they worked with always blurred/removed it from their promotional materials. So it got removed for good.

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        857 months ago

        remember when Canonical pushed Ads in Unity? That commentator remembers.

    • Gregor
      link
      fedilink
      127 months ago

      Saying “you can use Ubuntu pro” is not intrusive at all

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        No - and if they left it at that it would be great. I had to clean up 25 devices that had ububtu Lts, and that advantage had enabled the repos for thst shit, so apt wouldnt even do a dist-upgrade to prepare for do-release-upgrade.

        Its not just the OS either, they are cancer to oss with their mixed «community» and enterprise stuff.

        They only ever open source as little as they can.

        Sell services, not code

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        yeah, messing with apt just to push a service really doesn’t sit well. And they don’t stop there, snaps are preferred over apt packages in Ubuntu Land.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Do feel it is designed to scare normal users though.

        Like how the GUI software updater now shows a list of security updates, and then “there are more security updates available with Ubuntu pro” in the list of updates…. the obvious implication is “you’re computer has other known vulnerabilities that can only be fixed if you pay up”.

        Liiittlle bit ransomey and let be honest that’s by design.

        Wouldn’t consider myself part of the anti canonical pitchfork crowd but that new behaviour did irk me somewhat.

        If Microsoft did that people would be up in arms. Appreciate canonical provide Ubuntu is free but normal users wouldn’t get that nuance as they don’t think they pay for windows.

        • Laurel Raven
          link
          fedilink
          English
          87 months ago

          Last time I loaded up Ubuntu, considering it for a server, the moment I saw that, I deleted the VM and took it off my list permanently

          I have no interest in that kind of manipulative BS

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            107 months ago

            Yeah, I was not loving how hard they’re going for snaps, but the whole “Ubuntu Pro” bullshit scaremongering just 100% turned me off of the distro.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    387 months ago

    Ubuntu: Shoves snaps, netplan, and horrible documentation down your thoat

    Literally every other distro: Here’s our standardized system, do what you want

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    67 months ago

    Ubuntu just works. Its been my daily driver for nearly 20 years. I’ve had trouble from time to time but in the last ten years or so they have been fewer and fewer. I started with slackware and have many distros. Ubuntu is getting the job done. None of the other distros out there today bring more. I admit snaps are annoying but I slowly replace them on a new install.

    • AnimalsDream
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 months ago

      But you’re also promoting Ubuntu’s continued use, when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values. Mint is all the benefits of Ubuntu without that garbage, so why not that?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            Yeah, what is your point? Ubuntu is literally a modified version of Debian. Of course Debian wasn’t created from any other distro. First time I tried it was in 96. The point I’m making is that there is a certain effete push away from the established status quo but there isn’t any real need for it.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values

        No they are not. They are just another way of packaging apps that is specific to Ubuntu (and distros that can run Snap). The format has its flaws but calling it antithetical makes no sense.

        Also, I like Snaps. Ubuntu comes with Snap pre-installed. So I won’t be using Mint.

        • AnimalsDream
          link
          fedilink
          English
          87 months ago

          Is the Snap backend available and open-source? If not, then it’s antithetical to software freedom because Canonical is trying to close their users into a walled garden in the ways that Apple and Google are with their app stores.

          There are plenty of software packaging systems that work just as well or better than Snap, and promote software freedom (Flatpak, Appimage, or even just traditional package managers). By using and promoting Snap over these, you are working against the growth of digital rights.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I don’t care that the server is controlled by Canonical. Most Flatpaks are on Flathub and it’s not a problem.

              If flathub became a problem, people could easily and openly switch another server.

  • udon
    link
    fedilink
    66
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Ubuntu’s role in the ecosystem is important. They are good at first luring people into using linux. Then the users get pissed off of Ubuntu, because of Snap, ads, or whatever random crap they know from Windows. Finally, they move on to better options, be it Arch, Debian, or Puppy. Ubuntu ensures they don’t all stick to the same

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Ubuntu’s role in the ecosystem is important.

      I think it used to be. There’s still some inertia, but Canonical has used up a lot of goodwill through the years and other distributions have picked up the slack.
      Nowadays I wouldn’t point a newcomer towards Ubuntu. It’s trash. Just use anything else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        It’s literally not though. For anyone dipping their toes into Linux for the first time Ubuntu is by far and large the best place for them to start. Cononical has made a continuous concerted effort over all these years to make Linux more accessible to the layperson and it certainly shows in Ubuntu’s user friendly-ness. It might not be the right choice for someone with more knowledge of the inner-workings of Linux, or maybe not the right choice for someone who is concerned with the issues around SNAP, but the average user and especially a new Linux user does not care about these things.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Historically, yes, Ubuntu has put in the most effort into being the most user-friendly, most easy-to-use distro.

          However, I would argue that is not really the case anymore because as other distros (especially Mint and Pop!) have arisen for a user-friendly experience, Canonical has gradually abandoned this over the past few years in favour of being more server focused. Most of the innovation for user-friendly design just isn’t coming from Canonical anymore.

          The biggest argument for Ubuntu for beginners is that there are more resources such as tutorials for it - mostly momentum.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          For anyone dipping their toes into Linux for the first time Ubuntu is by far and large the best place for them to start.

          This was true maybe 10 years ago but not any more.

          For example, the default gnome desktop is terrible. You have to install gnome tweaks to adjust anything. It requires some Chrome plugin… It’s an impossible chore for a n00b to increase the font size. Likewise with other simple adjustments.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      I don’t mind Ubuntu server, though you’re right you need to clean it up a bit by uninstalling snap and killing the login ad of managed k8s, the LTS versions have been quite consistently easy to deal with and stable, but then again so has Debian.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      327 months ago

      Don’t forget mint, i started linux journey 2 months back and it’s going great with few mishaps.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        147 months ago

        Aww mint, you never forget your first, it’s a bit mundane for me now, these days if it hasn’t taken of its desktop and said sudo me harder daddy 3 seconds after It posts I move on to the next young model.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          My first was Sun Solaris Unix, but now I’m a middle aged engineer who wants to fix company product issues rather than personal workstation issues, and Mint rocks my socks.

          The mundanity of my computer working seamlessly every day is right up there with the mundanity of my car starting every morning, as far as how much it bothers me, lol.

          But there’s nothing wrong with messing with your car’s engine or your computer’s OS, obviously. Some people are just in a place where they want to do that and some aren’t.

        • L3ft_F13ld!
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Yeah Mint was great when I first got curious and that hasn’t changed. Ubuntu always has little issues and random error reporting dialogues and shit. Never had that issue with Mint. Mint also doesn’t force Snaps on you and gives you a more traditional interface. It just seems better for beginners.

          These days I feel like Ubuntu should be tried after you have some more experience with troubleshooting and fixing things with Mint.

        • bruhduh
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          Don’t worry, you’ll return to it after almost decade of distro hopping and wanting for your pc to just work