“AI” is a scam that’s contributing to planetary destruction. But it’s nowhere near a problem on the same scale. This kind of political theater only fuels the “AI” BS.
And I want to treat the UN like my weekly garbage, and have it hauled away and buried.
Yeah, it was so much better when there was a war in Europe every 10 years. Let’s go back to that.
You can thank NATO and the USA’s military for lack of war in Europe, the UN is a joke.
Sooo high urgency with zero consequence for missing targets?
AI: “Put glue in your pizza.” UN: “Ow no! It’s sentient.”
So… a convention every 4 years?
I heard they’re drafting a resolution to sheepishly ask the US ‘why the big cars?’
Ineffective policies for the poor’s that has a negligible effect while giant corporations make billions and exacerbate the problem?
Sounds same as always. Maybe they’ll do it now with a sense of urgency?
“We should do something about this” - COPXX
All this AI doomer talk is pointless. AI isn’t the problem, humans are.
Yeah, we ahould something about those humans! /s
Capitalism is the problem. Humans use language, learn and can change behaviour over time. We’re not pre-programmed automatons. “Humans are the problem” is doomer talk.
Culture, which can change.
I agree. It’s great to have machines do the work we don’t want to do so we can do other things with our lives.
We just need to get over this mentality that those who have more deserve more and those who have less deserve less.
Problem resolved itself… ChatGPT is down.
I… does the UN think they’re handling climate change well and promptly?
i mean the global un is pretty good on it; it’s just that the larger world powers (especially the us every time they have a conservative who goes backward on it) tend to drag their feet on it
I mean I don’t think it’s the UN’s fault they can’t get shit done about climate change, but I still wouldn’t use it as a model
Also China doesn’t want to fix their shit. So they’ll always be a problem.
So… do nothing about it?
« creating an AI fund to back projects in these [poorer] nations, establishing AI standards and data-sharing systems, and creating resources such as training to help nations with AI governance. »
So basically burn money and energy on some hallucinating algorithm should be as important as investing in green energy and reducing CO2 levels. That makes sense. Like, yeah, totally onboard. What could go wrong?
those ai projects will be countering the climate change projects! government at its usual
But, let me guess, the billionaires don’t want them to.
So ignore it until it kills us?
Haha yeah, I know right cries
Bevause they are doing something for the climate?
Ohh okay, so the AI is free to prosper 😁
I’d like to ignore it until it goes away too, but I don’t think that’s an effective strategy for either issue.
So, do nothing for 40 years while it gets progressively worse and allow countries to sign useless feel good things like the Paris Agreement?
Each one of these “initiatives” is just another 20 year delay in policy shift.
