- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
I’m a bit concerned about the block synchronization part. Mainly whether it can be used for some form of enforcement. My major concern is regarding shadow libraries, because I believe knowledge should be accessible to everyone. Can someone familiar weigh on?
Knowledge, perhaps but there are alredy places knowledge can be acquired publically like libraries etc.
No{one/many} are entitled to people’s personal spaces or thoughts especially if they are harrased a lot or the admins of an instance don’t do a good job protecting people from harrasment etc.
Folks have the right at any time to block others from seeing whatever they put out for any reason, instances the same, otherwise bad or insufficient moderation and harrasment happens just like on commercial social media (we bring that up because commercial social media cares even less a lot of the time).
Folks can and do release their knowledge publically (sometimes for payment) as well, so bookshops and perhaps video sites, more personal blogs etc might be a good place to find that stuff instead of trying to get into people’s personal spaces if they don’t want you or any{one/many} to.
[Sarcasm] Can’t see how this will go wrong at all, nope.
Could you explain why [it will]?
We’re very nervous about anything that claims or wants to index the fediverse. Which is what we thought this was wanting to do at least in part, but reading through we aren’t sure if it does or not want to do that or will.
You’re saying that this could be some sort of Morris… Worm?
We don’t understand.
Who’re “we”…?
We’re plural.
I don’t follow. You’ve referred to yourself as “I” several times recently. I’m not trying to antagonize; but rather understand. Is a plural pronoun something you can set aside when necessary? Are all pronouns interchangeable at will?
Oh, well we can explain that.
Firstly it depends on if all of us are saying something or think a certain thing or just one of us.
Secondly if you’re referring to our post history it was a mixture of that and not wanting to be out here but we’ve had enough of hiding what/who we are recently and now it feels wrong to do that so we decided to be more ‘public’ about it.
Does that help?
I think it does. Thanks.
Lol, but no. That’s not what we mean.
We do.
Ah, troll. Gotcha. Blocked.
Edit: To be clear, they’re roleplaying a psychological disorder that does not work the way they think it does (or rather even mulch a bunch of disorders together under a term that does not actually have any scientific basis), like those kids on TicTok claiming to have ADHD or autism and then do some weird shit in front of the camera that they believe are things that people with ADHD or autism do. This is extremely tasteless and should be removed from your instance. /rant
If you can’t handle the shocking reality of someone choosing unusual pronouns to refer to themselves, fediverse may not be the social media for you.
In reponse to your edit.
This is nothing to do with DID and we aren’t roleplaying.
We likely have been plural longer than you have been alive and before things like tiktok existed too (which we aren’t even on), so we do know what we are and don’t appreciate the accusation that you having likely no experience with this know our experience better than we do.
Also medical science does show this is a real thing but outside of DID and other such things it has not been researched.
So neither you nor ‘science’ knows what you/it is talking about.
How is being plural being a troll?
We suggest you do some reading
My man I upvoted ur comment before this one… I am still missing what is u saying here tho
You’re welcome to have your own beliefs.
You are not, however, welcome to use those beliefs to invalidate someone else’s lived experience.
