• Blaster M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is like people complaining about how Ubuntu 16.04 LTS support ended not long ago (2021-04-29)

    Or macOS 10.9 Mavericks (2016-12-01)

    Or Android 6.0 (2018-08-01)

    Or Debian 8 “Jessie” (2018-06-17)

    Or Linux Mint 17 (2019-07-01)

    Or Fedora 23 (2016-12-20)

    Or Slackware 14.1 (2024-01-01)

    Of all of these, not even Slackware comes close to how long Microsoft has supported Windows 10 post release (2015)

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Yes, but you don’t migrate to Windows 11 from those.

      • Blaster M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You do migrate to newer versions of those ossses with new de and backend lib versions, and all the breaking changes that entails which means spending another week chasing down broken stuff and learning how different things work now.

        Which is about the same

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      To my knowledge upgrading to the newer release of any of those linux distros was not blocked by having only slightly old and perfectly serviceable hardware.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        To my knowledge upgrading to the newer release of any of those linux distros did not cost any money to the users, either.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Sounds like they’re about to get sued by the EU because they’re basically asking you to pay again for a product you have already paid for. Discontinuing a service that was advertised as the “last windows you’ll ever need” is one thing, but sending you another bill on a whim is something entirely different. Microsoft might just have ensured the longevity of Win10 for the foreseeable future without making much if any profit from it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Requiring a support contract to receive continuing updates of software that was very publicly approaching end of support, with published EoL dates for years now does not break any laws.

      By that logic, no support contracts are legal in the EU at all, and no product would ever be sunset.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I like all the comments ready to take a fisting in the ass from Microsoft just to keep Windows 10.

    If you raised a fucking stink instead of taking this shitty deal, they may be forced to keep supporting it for free anyway like they did with Windows 7.

    They’ve really got you guys cowed into paying for the convenience of getting fucked, don’t they?

    This is a company with a market cap of $3.04 trillion and you guys are just gonna bend over and take it for $30 bucks? Wew lad. They don’t need your fucking thirty dollars, and you fucking know it. It’s a god damned shakedown.

    Microsoft: Wouldn’t it be a shame if your computer was somehow insecure and got hacked?

    Sounds like a Mafioso showing up for protection money to me.

    EDIT: There’s still about 700 million Windows 10 PC’s still on the market. If every single existing Windows 10 machine paid for this service, Microsoft would make $21 billion dollars next year off this alone. It’s a shakedown, do the fucking math. (700,000,000 x $30 = $21,000,000,000) Even if only half do it, it’s still a cool $10.5 billion.

    EDIT II: This also normalizes the practice of paying for security updates for consumers. You really want to take us down that path where every security update is paid?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      What an idiotic perspective. Microsoft has supported W10 for literally 12 years at the cutoff date. Show me another software product that receives TWELVE YEARS worth of free support. 30 bucks is fair enough. For enterprises this is play money, if you are a private, you could upgrade fucking 7 keys. Which means, you didn’t need to pay a fucking cent to MS since 2007. No one has ever matched this kinda support. Ten percent of this is considered fucking generous.

      And herre is a thought for you. The reason why windows is full of adware and spyware is precisely because of dickheads, who won’t pay 30 fucking dollars EVERY TWENTY YEARS. This is your fault.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Microsoft: heh heh heh, looks like you’ll be paying me $30 for that windows 10 installation.

      Me: Bitch, I’m on Windows 7, and keep ignoring the OS bitching at me to turn the firewall on!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      It would make sense if Microsoft was liable for any security faults. I’d actually pay for something like that but of course you’re probably paying for some nebulous promise of something between security at best effort basis and whatever they feel like.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you’re somewhat tech savvy, don’t have anything against the high seas and absolutely need Windows, look into Windows 10 LTSC.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    506 months ago

    Considering that when people paid $100 for that OS they were told that it would be the “last Windows to be released”, shouldn’t there be a class action lawsuit?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They weren’t told that, that was an off-hand comment by an employee (not even a spokesperson) that the media took and ran with. Source:

      Right now we’re releasing Windows 10, and because Windows 10 is the last version of Windows, we’re all still working on Windows 10.

      I think they meant “latest” not “last.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        For what it’s worth

        “Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers,” says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement to The Verge. “We aren’t speaking to future branding at this time, but customers can be confident Windows 10 will remain up-to-date and power a variety of devices from PCs to phones to Surface Hub to HoloLens and Xbox. We look forward to a long future of Windows innovations.”

        https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-version-of-windows

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Windows will be delivered as a service

          Which is largely true, there have been a number of “service packs” that were released as regular updates throughout the Windows 10 lifespan. So it definitely seems they want people to not think about the specific Windows version they’re on. From that article:

          Microsoft could opt for Windows 11 or Windows 12 in future, but if people upgrade to Windows 10 and the regular updates do the trick then everyone will just settle for just “Windows” without even worrying about the version number.

          Windows 7, for example, had one major service pack, with a few isolated updates, whereas Windows 10 had a major update about every 6 months, and each one of those checkpoints was supported for about a year and a half. The final update was at the end of 2022, and it’s support runs 3 years.

          So yeah, I think they met what they said, but the messaging wasn’t particularly clear how long that support would be provided for.

  • Th4tGuyII
    link
    fedilink
    186 months ago

    Microsoft got the grift of a century. Make Win11 so bad that people will literally pay you NOT to force them onto it! /s

    Seriously though, fuck Microsoft - $30 per year to roll out the occasional security update is obscene! They can go stuff themselves with their $3 trillion market cap

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If Microsoft wants to buy me a new computer to get me off Win10, they’re more than welcome to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      it’s pretty dangerous not to be getting security updates. probably for regular users won’t be a big deal. i have a feeling really bad vulnerabilities will be patched even if you don’t pay for it just out of a potential PR issue. but i would almost definitely pay this if I were a business who didn’t plan on switching to Win 11 soon

      on a personal level i don’t understand why anyone continues to use windows these days

  • peopleproblems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    166 months ago

    Wait. They want me to pay for something I already paid for?

    Well guess my $2.5k new windowless machine is looking better everyday.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Oh yeah. Windows XP Professional 64 bit. Each “upgrade” used the same license and never really got screwy until 10. Won’t go to 11.

        Edit: Actually I don’t think I even paid for that, I think it was an OEM license my dad got from his work.

    • tb_
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Better yet: you don’t have to pay Microsoft at all to make the switch!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        I’m really surprised they haven’t managed to push Azure Linux into the fold. Release a desktop version, Find some way to make attractive for all those Windows 10 people ready to walk away. Then just slowly fold all the bullshit back in. They could even bring the gui completely Windows 10esque