Summary

Lawyers for Elon Musk’s America PAC acknowledged in court that $1 million-a-day “winners” in its voting sweepstakes aren’t randomly selected but are chosen as paid “spokespeople.”

The Philadelphia hearing saw DA Larry Krasner argue the sweepstakes is an illegal lottery lacking clear rules or privacy protections. Intended to boost Trump’s campaign in swing states, the initiative faces scrutiny for alleged data misuse.

Musk’s involvement as the PAC’s figurehead could lead to criminal charges as Pennsylvania, an important battleground state, nears Election Day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    286 months ago

    Illegal lottery in Pennsylvania, okay.

    But how does this not also violate FEC regulations and, you know, US law? He’s literally paying people to vote and the implication is to vote for his specific candidate.

  • Lexam
    link
    fedilink
    1056 months ago

    Holy shit. Having the balls to admit in court that your sweepstakes is fraudulent! That’s a special kind of special.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Some people were calling this the day he announced it. That it would turn out they weren’t random, thus not an illegal lottery.

    He’s not half a sixtheenth as clever as he thinks he is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        76 months ago

        IANAL, but would anyone have standing to sue if there aren’t any losses? It’s not like people bought tickets.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          126 months ago

          I mean that’s still time and effort to do whatever form was necessary to “apply”. It also probably runs foul of lottery rules to have not randomly picked winners because everyone else didn’t have a chance of winning. Like if someone “in the know” adulterates the powerball numbers the fact that everyone else was statistically unlikely to win doesn’t change that they lied about the chance to win.