Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 months ago

    How is this allowed under an act of congress? Oh right, lack of accountability and oversight.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    895 months ago

    It’s funny how Brazil (a country that’s seen the consequences of authoritarianism) is handling their own attempted coup vs the U.S., we are basically welcoming Trump back after everything he’s done.

    After the coup attempt he should have been barred from office and arrested. This is such a ridiculous timeline.

    • Skeezix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      Societies get the leaders they deserve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        I guess… he barely won the popular vote, and didn’t pick up any significant amount of new voters. I wouldn’t say the basically half of voters who voted against this deserve it.

        • Skeezix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          The 80 million people who didn’t vote deserve it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Man, no wonder we go to war with people all the time. Can’t even not wish harm on people simply for not voting. Is it frustrating, sure, but i don’t wish harm on people over it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          75 months ago

          This is the part that hurts the most.

          I canvassed, I rallied, I pushed people to vote. I did what I could to ensure the fascist didn’t win again, but he still did. Enough of my country either didn’t care, found some excuse to not vote for her, or wanted him to to be president.

          I was denied a chance at a primary, but I was excited for Kamala. There is no person who can sit and represent 300 million people and make them all happy, but she was more on my side than not, and I’m willing to push for ‘better right now’ and then push for ‘better later’ too as distinct events.

          As part of the now vocal minority, I don’t relish what is to come. I didn’t ask for it and I don’t want it; but lumped in with ‘Americans’, we sure seem to.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah, it sucks. I really wish we would have dealt with the issue when he planned a coup iinstead of basically letting him walk all over everyone back into power.

  • guldukat
    link
    fedilink
    335 months ago

    Could open the door? The door was ripped from its hinges already.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    In how many ways do we need to signal to Trump that he can do whatever he wants, without repercussion?

    We’re so fucking useless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    Shit now there’s nothing stopping him from doing immoral undemocratic stuff like pardoning his children.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      Lol, trump would do way worse than pardon his kid that was targeted by the doj for something that hardly gets charged in the first place. Trump incites violence, disregards the constitution, is a sexual predator (probably a pedophile) and the list goes on.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          115 months ago

          Biden is literally following the rules with an official presidential pardon. Trump is violating a law he signed into law.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              Did you forget your original comment?

              Shit now there’s nothing stopping him from doing immoral undemocratic stuff like pardoning his children.

              Or did you bring up “pardoning his children” right after Biden pardoned his son for an entirely unrelated reason?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                He did that? Oh never mind, if Biden did it, then it’s ok if Trump does it, too. Please disregard my initial comment. It is in fact not immoral and undemocratic to pardon your own children.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  Yes. It is “okay” if a president uses their legal power to pardon people for federal crimes. In that it is their legal right to do so.

                  Is this the first day you’ve been aware of that fact? It’s been true for a very, very long time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          You tell 'em Captain Logic! Also, when are we going to poison this damn infestation of giant pandas?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      You’re right. What could Trump possibly do that would even come remotely close to equaling Joe Biden doing such a totally outrageous and unacceptable legal thing?

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    145 months ago

    does not matter. americans have a shit education and therrfor are now dumbed down to enjoy a life in idiocracy. and just like last time i am sure hundreds of thousands of the dumbest will die. covid happend when wuhan lover donald was in office and tbis time it is going to be similar. dumb people are a magnet to problems. and the “voter” will love it! some wrestling guy will show them how to treat mpox with cooked rawmilk…it just needs to be a really stupid idea that triggers others. like nobody cares about “the wall” anymore,right? will the fat fuck finish his wall? nope! because retardism is their new religion. i am expecting hulk hogan or kid rock to be in a key position for womensrights, education or something as far out of their mental range as that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    395 months ago

    The more I see this unfold the more I understand why Trump won. (This is in no way me supporting Trump, the guy deserves the worst this world has to offer!)

    Anyways, the establishment and dems are a bunch of toothless liars! If I was some poor chap doing my best to just stay alive in the US I likely also would’ve have lost hope in my vote mattering. Legally speaking, it quite literally doesn’t. The dems regularly shitting on the primaries is a great example of this (and ofc the electoral collage).

    Nobody in politics cares about the people. After the 2008 crash, both the reps and dems bailed out all the banks responsible for the mass fraud, while the people that suffered barely got shit.

    The vast majority of people didn’t vote and some voted Trump out of desperation, wanting any change at all. It’s fucking sad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Warren is a good example of someone who does care and I can only recommend her books on the matter. She came from the same place as everyone else and managed to get where she has been for a good while now.

      If she’d been president 2016 or any time after that things would’ve looked a lot different, probably globally, I can almost guarantee as much.

      Edit: and by different I mean a lot fucking better, to be clear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        135 months ago

        You mean Bernie, not Warren. Plus Bernie was winning primaries and insanely more popular than Warren.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Because you don’t live in a democracy. And you don’t get elected after every primary, primaries are held before election to see who is popular. Sanders approval rating is through the roof and has been consistently over the years, easily the most popular senator across the board.

            Your answer is the DNC, ain’t that complicated. Sanders won the votes of the people, but the liberals and dems pushed Hillary anyway in 2016, and lost.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        75 months ago

        Yeah, but she’s not progressive enough for the leftists (plus they hate her for some perceived slight against Bernie), and too left for the moderates.

  • Wren
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    could open the door to corruption.

    “could”

    ROFL!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      “Hey! You’re not supposed to do that!”

      “Is there a specific law being broken?”

      “Well…no, not exactly. But it breaks with tradition!”

      • ObliviousEnlightenment
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        “Dont enforce democratic norms with tradition” should be in the historical rulebook. Right next to not printing money to pay bills, not invading Russia in winter, and not touching Americas boats

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Even if there was a law being broken, time has shown that Trump is pretty much above the law at this point.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Those poor dogs. Someone should call the SPCA and repo… Defunded you say?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Maybe a network of volunteers can foster care for some, a few have sweet temperaments ?

        I can volunteer some pet food

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        625 months ago

        it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

        donvict part 1 will take a generation, at least.

        donvict part 2 will take a lot longer and require practically-impossible coordination and commitment to get non-republicants to the levels of representation needed for amendment ratifications and impeachments.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          275 months ago

          it usually takes 4-6 years or so for democrats to fix most of whatever republciants screw up.

          Liberals never actually fix what conservatives screw up. We never closed Gitmo and we still have troops based in Iraq. We never actually ended the War on Drugs (which has left Republicans a loophole to ban contraceptives by listing them as controlled substances). We never truly repealed Jim Crow and much of the country still relies on forced labor even in liberal bastions like California or New York.

          Trump’s just pulling back the curtain on how much has rotted.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            145 months ago

            Liberals never actually fix what conservatives screw up.

            Clinton fucking balanced the budget.

            The real problem is Republican spend 4-8 years screwing everything up. Over the next 4 years, with the slimmest of margins, Democrats roll back 80% of it. Then you come in and say “both sides”.

            If we want things to stop racheting to the right, we have to elect Dems more than half the time.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              Clinton fucking balanced the budget.

              For what? A few months? And largely by balancing off the SS Trust, a trick you can only do once (as Bush Jr discovered when he was too far in debt to privatize it).

              The real problem is Republican spend 4-8 years screwing everything up.

              Half the Democratic Party was along for the ride on the Bush agenda. Kennedy embraced NCLB, Clinton and Kerry fully endorsed the AUMF, Joe Biden authored much of the Patriot Act Hell, Graham-Leech-Biley was signed under Clinton, queuing up the financial crash of 2008.

              This isn’t just Republicans. The problem is broadly bipartisan.

          • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            85 months ago

            Liberals never actually fix what conservatives screw up.

            They do, it’s just they mostly concern themselves with the economic screw ups, less-so the rights ones.

            Think ‘gay people can marry and have kids to give us more economic slaves’ vs. ‘gay people can’t marry, can’t have kids, and we’re going to use them as a scapegoat for our issues.’

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              95 months ago

              Liberals (which I’m taking to mean Democrats) didn’t “fix” gay marriage. Right up until the Iowa Supreme Court decision, in the early 2000’s, the argument in Democratic circles was that gay-rights organizations should pipe down, settle for civil unions, and stop making gay marriage an issue. They were afraid of handing the Republicans a weapon. It was the gay-rights organizations that pushed it through the courts, and prominent Democratic politicians like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden “evolved” their positions to support it. I mean no criticism by the use of quotes. Kudos to them for changing their minds, but it wasn’t liberals that made it happen.

              • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 months ago

                I’d say it was liberals that made it happen once there was overwhelming public support, which again, is performative, but drastically different from actively suppressing it. Someone has to pass the things into laws, and in the US it’s either Republicans or Democrats, and across the board any services those poor people do have was introduced through Democrats.

                Again, under duress, I don’t argue otherwise. Up here in Canada it was the Liberals being forced to put Healthcare as a ‘universal’* right by the NDP (our Left wing party), then the NDP again to force Liberals to put Dental care through. But they actually did it, and the Conservatives don’t.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Think ‘gay people can marry and have kids to give us more economic slaves’ vs. ‘gay people can’t marry, can’t have kids, and we’re going to use them as a scapegoat for our issues.’

              Gay marriage was legalized under a majority conservative court system way back in 2003. When it went to a poplar vote in the bright blue State of California in 2008, Prop 8’s plan to kill it passed by a healthy margin

              This was the same year Obama was tiptoeing around full legalization of gay marriage for fear of pissing off too many swing voters in the Midwest.

              Gay marriage wasn’t fully legalized into 2015, again by the conservative courts. Efforts to legislate civil rights for LGBT people have largely failed even when the Pres and Leg were fully in Dem control.

              • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                25 months ago

                Gay marriage was legalized under a majority conservative court system way back in 2003.

                Again, under a Liberal government. And I keep saying over and over – I know they phone it in and constantly give bigot ‘swing voters’ things they want. I’ve never said anything against that. It had a 60% approval by the public in 2015 when it was fully legalized. So again, for like the fifth goddamn time – Liberal governments can be forced to do these things by popular will. Conservatives won’t (I’m sure there’s like two examples someone will bring up, again, exception proves the rule.)

                To sum: Liberals have to be forced to allow LGBT rights by popular opinion. Conservatives do this.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  Again, under a Liberal government.

                  The Republicans controlled every branch of government in 2003, as well as a majority of state legislatures and governorships.

                  What broke for gay marriage in 2003 was a libertarian strain of conservatism defecting from the mainstream. Liberals accepted the change with the same passivity as they accepted the status quo.

                  It had a 60% approval by the public in 2015 when it was fully legalized.

                  Again by a majority conservative court. The Obama legislature dragged its heels.

                  Liberal governments can be forced to do these things by popular will.

                  They can be forced to do things by powerful socio-economic interests. In this case, a big chunk of the legal community broke for gay marriage and Obama didn’t try to get in the way.

                  But they didn’t do anything. They just let the change happen.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            445 months ago

            you see that’s the thing, its not exactly blue stats. its blue city’s, islands surrounded by hundreds of miles of red oceans

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              205 months ago

              Rural/urban divide is not unique to the US in any way whatsoever. Also, expect polarization to self perpetuate as blue voters move to blue states and red states to move to red states.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  45 months ago

                  It’s also roughly the size and population of Texas alone. Does it have a wildly unfair Electoral College?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                Me in Europe for the first time a long time ago asking the same question in every country and getting the truth from a woman in Rome: “oh, we don’t hate the Jews. You’re fine here… But leave the cities… Yeah, it’s like anywhere”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              95 months ago

              I saw a post about that the other day, it showed a map of all the states with populations smaller than LA county. Almost every single red state was highlighted. Really shows you how silly the electoral college system is.