The suit, filed earlier this year, argues that HP all-in-one printers stop all functions when ink levels reach some arbitrary point.

  • VanillaGorilla
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The most amazing and surprising achievement they have made is to convince customers they are to be trusted. HP has been shit for decades now.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Us nerds called it back when they merged with Compaq. Great, we said, two once decent but now shitty companies can combine their stupidity into one new mega-stupid mega-corporation. They’ve barely done a single thing right since. It sure as shit didn’t take long for us to get proven right, but somehow they’re still shambling along. This just goes to show that no matter what nerds think, what’s “best” for a product or industry and what actually turns out to be profitable are rarely actually the same thing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    652 years ago

    This is great news… if HP loses we might all be rewarded $1.89 for years of extortion-level ink prices! Problem solved!1!!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        Don’t worry, the lawyers who win these type of case will be able to afford lots and lots of happy meals. They typically are the only ones who ever make out in the end.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    862 years ago

    Thank god, this has been one of the most anti consumer things of our time and it needs to stop.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Whats fucked up is this type of bullshit has been a damned meme for over a fucking decade and they’re just now allowing a class action to go to trial. At this point lots of other printer makers have followed suit in some form or another.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Previous judges have thrown out cases like this. Especially in places like CA. And I thought CA was anticorporate! /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1272 years ago

    If you don’t need an all-in-one printer, then the Brother HL-L2350DW is great. The best thing about it is that it prints. These accolades are really the bare minimum you’d expect from a device called a “printer”, but that’s where we are in the world of consumer electronics.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      That doesn’t seem to be an all in one though? It looks like just a BW laser printer. I ended up with a really cheap epson that meets my limited needs but those can be hit or miss and the ink sure isn’t cheap if you use a lot, which I do not. It doesn’t have the problems of the HP units at least.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I have a 2700DW and have been happy with it for years. I recommend Brother to everyone, but I’m curious what Potatos_are_not_friends has to say about their experience below.

      • Ebby
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Some Brother printers received a firmware update that locked out 3rd party toner supplies. Wasn’t a nice thing to do.

        I still recommend them, but less enthusiasticly then I did. It’s not the sure-thing no-shit printer brand they used to be, but they do make some great printer models if you get the right one.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      We’ve got three of these or in our office for just that reason. I can say by way of largely meaningless observation that there was at least one design revision of these things in recent years, because the current ones have been cheapified by removing the little one line LCD display and replacing it with a couple of blinkenlights. I much prefer the older ones with the display, because the readout can at least in theory give you a clue as to what the damned thing has its knickers in a twist about this time.

      Two of our units turn into print job motels on a regular basis, as in print jobs go in but they don’t come out (usually with no error thrown). Unplugging the printer and plugging it back in causes it to spit out all of the print jobs that were stuck in it, which typically total in the dozens because our (l)users’ only method of troubleshooting if something did not print the first time is to try to print it again seven or eight more times. The third one we have doesn’t do this, but it’s in a location where it is used a lot less which may be a contributing factor. I wonder if this is some kind of variable overflow issue or something.

      We have a couple of their multifunction machines around, too. Whatever implementation Brother uses to link the client software on the PC and the machine itself is also hot garbage. In particular, ours constantly lose association with their PC’s for the “scan from console” feature, for no readily identifiable reason, and there’s evidently no way to force it to reassociate other than uninstalling and reinstalling the PC software suite which is a monumental pain in the taint to be doing on a regular basis.

      The dinky Canon ImageClass I have squatting in my personal office, however, has never given me any issues.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        that’s quite exactly the opposite of my experience. I’ve had two different Canon inkies that went to shit real quick.

        My Brother laser has printed far beyond both of those, and with no issues

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      I bought a brother laser printer when I started working from home full time over the pandemic. Best printer I’ve ever had. Does it’s job and asks for very little.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      It’s crazy how as soon as printers became reliable to function, companies purposely made them shit again.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        You’re certainly not wrong. I have two Okidata 320 Turbos in my basement that were manufactured some time in the late '80’s that still work just fine, if I ever have occasion to fire one up (which is almost never). They don’t need a single damn thing, ever, except some tractor feed paper and a ribbon. They’ll probably outlive me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            102 years ago

            I had a dot matrix in the newsroom I worked in mid-90s. We had to cut the printout down and tape it to 8x11 paper to fit in the document stand in the broadcast booth …

            Nothing like being 45 seconds to air and hoping “BRRRRT BRRRRT BRRRRRRRRT” finished up real soon

            Never jammed, never went offline, never ran out of Cyan …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      402 years ago

      I made the mistake of recommending Brother printers without identifying the exact version. The Brother printer my coworker bought took a page from HP’d bullshit. He returned it after a week.

      Imo - Look for ones that don’t need internet or just perform 1 extremely specific thing. Or in my case, I printing a lot of b&w docs as cheap as possible.

      My recommendation would be the brother laser printer HL-L2300D from 2014. The 2350DW looks similar and is more recent from 2021 and might be okay too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        292 years ago

        It bugs me to hear that. My mantra for years has been “Buy a Brother printer, they just work”. Do you know what model of Brother had a HP style limitation, and what the limitation was? I’d like to educate myself before I recommend them again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          I had a Brother MFC something that had page counts on the toner cartridges: they would only print so many pages before saying they were out of ink, regardless of how much ink was left. You could access a secret menu and reset the counts using a special button sequence, but it was a gigantic pain at the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          I don’t think it’s the same printer/issue but recently my brother printer that I bought in '21 decided it was out of toner and refused print without replacing the toner. I forget what setting I had to find to reset it but it works fine now, on the same toner cartridge I bought with the printer (I don’t print often).

          Off the top of my head it was a dcp-l2550dw, can’t check it right now.

          It was mildly annoying to deal with, I remember the instructions not working exactly and having to troubleshoot, I can’t recall what I had to do to fix it. I can imagine somebody with less time on their hands just giving in and replacing the toner.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        L3210CW owner here. Awesome printer. Maybe in retrospect I would have bought the one that did duplex but it’s not a concern really

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    632 years ago

    founders Bill Hewlett and David Packard were so customer trusting and had such probity that it revolutionized corporate america and empowered startups to bootstrap from nothing. if they saw what became of their reputation they would’ve forced a name change. thanks Carly Fiorina for destroying an amazing institution. I hope your resume refuses to scan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      You still see a lot of businesses today using HP lasers from as early as 1990. Crazy that operating systems today still support some seriously old printers. It’s also remarkable how good HP used to be before right around the time they merged with Compaq.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      492 years ago

      They were engineers, and made stuff they liked and were proud of, and it showed. When they exited the leadership roles, the MBAs took over and it was all downhill from there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        372 years ago

        You know, I’m starting to have a stronger dislike of MBAs than I do lawyers. Even though lawyers were the traditional wiping boys.

        • sylver_dragon
          link
          fedilink
          302 years ago

          Lawyers get a bad rap. If you are ever falsely accused of a crime, you’re going to really wish you had a lawyer.

          MBAs are agents of decay and corruption.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            92 years ago

            Being falsely accused of a crime really isn’t much of a problem until a lawyer is complicit in the accusation. False accusations usually end early in the investigation unless the accuser is coached on how to tailor their accusation to fit the law. Your lawyer is solving problems that only exist because of lawyers.

            Let’s not forget that “politician” is just a fancy term for a lawyer who hates working with clients.

            MBAs are, indeed, agents of decay and corruption, but they only play on a field that was designed and built by lawyers.

      • LemmyLefty
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        It’s amazing how so many MBAs can tank a business. I’m seeing the same thing in my organization: as the number of people who have ever worked in the field decreases relative to the MBAs, things get worse, in both cultural and functional ways.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          Half the PMs in my company have MBA degrees and they’re all morons.

          Want to cosplay as a person with a MBA from Wharton?

          Snort a bunch of coke, drive a expensive car you bought with loan money and micromanage while vaguely gesturing and quoting Wolf of Wall Street

          • LemmyLefty
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Whoda thunk the difference between current me and successful me is a hatred of sniffly noses and a preference for sci-fi.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        My desires are more complicated.

        I want all of HP, Canon, Epson, and Xerox to lose. And more than that, I want them all to go out of business from a sharp plummet in sales.

        Brother can claim victory if they want, everyone seems to agree they’re the safe choice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    I need more.

    This whole “buy the whole product but block features from working without paying a fee” bullshit needs to stop. No questions.

    Cars need to be next.

  • RedFox
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I’m not sure there’s a brand out there that’s safe at this point, but I don’t think I would buy HP consumer products regardless of the price. At some point. Though to counter, it seems any company will do whatever the customers/regulators will let them get away with, especially if people keep buying them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    HP used to be good circa 2005-8. I used to have a HP mini and it had great build quality. DK what happened after that coz all of the stuff they have sold after 2010 is pure garbage honestly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      At this point HP isn’t a printer company. They’re an (overpriced) ink subscription company that makes DRM-ridden printers designed to keep you on their subscription model.

      Given how many other printer companies are following suit it seems that this is unfortunately a lucrative business model.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    52
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “Hey, can you scan this document for me?”

    I’m sorry, your magenta ink is low.

    “But … I’m not printing anything? None of what I need uses ink.”

    MAGENTA. I REQUIRE MAGENTA.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m in IT, and anything HP can just fuck off.

    Edit to add: Never buy any printer that comes with an ink/toner subscription service.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Haven’t bought a HP since their support told me to just buy a new printer and that the warning message wasn’t going away even though they could not confirm anything was wrong with it