• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    495 months ago

    This could have been a really cool reno with a better roof line and some vertical siding that tied in the butresses. Instead, it just looks cheap.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    65 months ago

    Bro we got the lowest prices around! I promise we are going to get you looking right. The restoration job your asking for we can deliver bro. Bro I got you. Your gonna save 60%. Property value is gonna go way up. Bro its all about calculating ROI. Algorithms and shit. 😂

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    I’ve heard that leaving one wall up like this classifies a construction project as a renovation. I’m guessing this was done because it was cheaper or it’s in a historic district? Idk

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      I’ve heard the same. If a property is ‘renovated’, it retains the same value, tax wise, no matter how much larger the renovated building is.

      Not sure how this plays out with a formerly tax exempt property like a church once it get converted into a non-tax exempt property such as a residential apartment building.

    • kubica
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      If that’s renovation anything can be called renovation.

      • merde alors
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        in old towns, unless the construction method itself has historical importance, they just keep the facade and build behind.

  • Justin
    link
    fedilink
    225 months ago

    Better than just demolishing the church, I guess, but they could have invested a little more into the materials and design and made it blend with the original facade better. Don’t just build a square vinyl box.

    • merde alors
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      there are many churches in Europe who were amputated or completely destroyed by American aerial bombings. Some were hastily rebuilt with cement and these hasty renovations after the WW2 have no architectural or historical value 🤷

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m guessing this picture isn’t of Europe. There’s a stroad, as well as minivans and SUVs. I would guess this is North America. Probably the US, but that’s just because I believe our neighbors to the north have a bit more class than this monstrosity indicates.

        #FuckCars

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            Not going to lie, as someone from a society where religious buildings are generally never reused into something else, I get mixed feelings seeing them being reused. Yes it’s good that they can still bring people together, it’s good not to knock decent walls down, but I don’t know. I’m not very religious but I often feel like in my community the church brings people together, even if the services don’t mean very much to me after two decades of Catholic school all but beat my faith out of me.

            “Churches in the west being changed into parking garages/clubs/restaurants/forced toddler trans surgery centers/mosques” is kind of a meme among the older generation of Christians in Lebanon. And by meme I mean they believe that 110% of western churches have been destroyed and that it’s a sign of the end times.

            I have mixed feelings on this topic usually. But boxing? Boxing in an old church sounds rad as hell.

            I don’t know why but it feels like it works. Community space, an activity that requires mutual respect, something raw that people have done for thousands of years, there’s an undeniable cool factor.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I don’t even really like boxing, but I’m thinking about the acoustics:

              SMACKSMACKSMACKSMACKSMACKSMACK-KAPOW!!!

              Like a choir of fucking angels!

    • merde alors
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      that’s exactly what’s avoided in renovation. What’s old and what’s built afterwards should be clearly separate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    Seems to be in North America (license plate dimensions) so they probably did that to maximize the number of apartments while still keeping as much of the church as possible (without necessarily being required to as it is in the UK), would have looked better with another type of siding though…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    465 months ago

    Is this another one of those “by law, the addition has to look visibly distinct from the historical structure” renovations?

    Same thing that allegedly happened to this one?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    465 months ago

    Before building work started I guarantee they promised "A tasteful renovation in keeping with the structure’s historical aesthetic"🙄

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    It looks like shit but it’s better than letting all those bricks go to waste. I bet the insulation’s pretty decent too.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    Anyone notice the house next door that’s almost touching the former church? There’s paint on the stone wall and the house”s windows. It’s like the painters didn’t mask anything.