At least two brands have said they will suspend advertising on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, after their ads and those of other companies were run on an account promoting fascism. The issue came less than a week after X CEO Linda Yaccarino publicly affirmed the company’s commitment to brand safety for advertisers.

  • arglebargle
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    When the platform you are on can’t seem to figure out its own brand, maybe it is time to move on?

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    The only surefire way for these company to control what their content appears next to is to rely on themselves. I expect them to start experimenting with the Fediverse, especially Mastodon, soon.

    … Shitposting on Lemmy is still superior for organic marketing though, especially for movies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They actually hire companies like Double Verify, an Israeli company, who man in the middle the ad and figure out where it is showing up.

      Disney doesn’t want their ads on porn sites, and pays a lot to keep it that way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      The BBC are trying a 6 month experiment of moving their Twitter style social media over to their own Mastodon server.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    482 years ago

    Someone needs to edit their new “logo” and add four lines at the extremities, just to see what it would look like.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      It doesn’t look as good as you would think. The spacing between the lines in the “X” logo aren’t evenly distributed, which means the added lines aren’t spaced properly either.

      Take my word on it, the end result looks more like a dancing cactus than a specific symbol used during World War II.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        That would not be the result I expected but a sort of “Pampa X” sounds way cooler anyway hehe.

  • Polymath
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    I couldn’t help but catch the line that

    Ads for brands including Adobe, Gilead Sciences, the University of Maryland’s football team, New York University Langone Hospital and NCTA-The Internet and Television Association were run alongside tweets from the account that had garnered hundreds of thousands of views, CNN observed.

    And there’s literally an entire black market of veterinarians recommending a very specific antiviral to cat parents unfortunate enough to have their cats be among the 1% of the global cat population whose mutation of feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) to feline coronavirus (FCoV) brings about Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), and that specific life-saving treatment is behind Gilead Sciences’ refusal to release their patent to veterinary use…

    Since FIP is usually fatal and there are no approved treatments available, GS-441524 has reportedly been sold on the black market and used by pet owners to treat affected cats, although Gilead Sciences has refused to license the drug for veterinary use.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    592 years ago

    NCTA and Gilead are an evil organization and an evil corporation. They should feel right at home with the Nazis.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    582 years ago

    Apple still advertises on Twitter. We need a website that tracks all of these companies that still advertise on that pro-nazi platform.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You can look into it but it doesn’t mean company supports X

          Look at pride month or the bud light thing

      • PorkRollWobbly
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        Disagree on not reading into it. You should be appalled by the fact that profit comes at the sacrifice of ethics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Yes but not enough people will boycott everything that supports things they are against. A lot of people will have a brand that they say “yeah but I really like them”

          And all corporations are evil, it’s not really a surprise

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Companies aren’t real, they’re just people organized into a collective, and people do have ethics.

            And contrary to Internet wisdom, corporations do not have a legal obligation to pursue profit at all cost.

            One might ask what the point of spreading that particular lie was.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Sure. But I find it strange that people act like those evil fucks are a faceless building and not individuals you can point to and say, “Hey, no, it’s that guy, he enslaved those kids.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Found one it’s called google, seem like all companies in the world advertise on twitter except for these two in the title that pulled out

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    How about a disclaimer for companies like people have when they play online. “Statements and opinions made by users do not reflect those of X” ESRB for ad companies to get it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Something like that is already in law as a kind of default. Companies are not responsible for the content posted by their users on the basis that no entity could possibly police that much content, with two exceptions:
      -Content must be removed if it is illegal and has been specifically pointed out by appropriate authorities for removal.
      -If an organisation willingly polices their own content in any way then they also take on responsibility for it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Why?

      These companies don’t have to do business with twitter.

      Now because their logo was next to some Nazi shit when they were promised it wouldn’t be, they are pulling their dollars because of broken promises.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Because it’s annoying when a lot of good shit goes to dog shit when ad companies get involved with the creative side of things. Just have it in the contract up front if it’s not already and they can agree to be on the platform all in or all out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          Who said the ad companies are making it go to dog shit by not wanting to be seen next to fascist content?