It’s not just lemmy that’s benefiting from Elon Musk.

  • Tygr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1222 years ago

    It’s not the rebrand that’s killing Twitter. Elon is. He’s proving to himself that he cannot, in fact, run Twitter better than the prior owners.

      • Tygr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        If you said it was the final nail in the coffin, sure. But for that to be the only reason?? Why??

        Are you one of those “my brand truck is better than yours because … bowtie” types?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 years ago

          Imagine your favourite fancy restaurant suddenly adopts an extreme “Batman” theme. Same food, but just hardcore decorated a la the Dark Knight. You’d probably still go there, but you’d have a different time. And you’d reconsider the types of people you’d bring there, etc.

          Brand is far more than the logo in the top corner, and I think marketing textbooks are going to use Twitter -> X as an example of how not to do things.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Now I’m imagining meeting a professional contact at a classy Italian sit down place, but the waitress greats us with a deep gravely “I’m Batman.”

            Thank you for building that moment for me. And yeah, I see exactly your point now. If I hadn’t already left X, I would be concerned about sharing a personal and professional brand with it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          For me personally it was simply a gut feeling of how stupid that name and logo looked on my screen. I was of course annoyed but everything else going on before, but that didn’t yet push me away. This is a minor thing, but it was the tipping point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      I wonder if previous twitter execs are feeling a bit bad to have sold him twitter to see it destroyed like that.

      I mean it certainly proves Elon is an idiot as he used fraud to manipulate the price and got played instead.

      But was it worth it to let him destroy Twitter just because he tried to defraud it?

      • Tygr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I’d be bummed out but happy I have an unlimited supply of hundred dollar bills to wipe away the tears.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I wonder how long twitter would able to run at a loss if elon didn’t take it over as a slapstick joke went wrong.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        322 years ago

        They got $44 billion, double what sane people thought the company was worth. It would be irresponsible not to take Elon for a ride.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Also illegal, since Twitter was a public company- they can’t discriminate on bona fide offers or they risk being sued.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          Responsible financially, as agents of the corporation, sure. And I understand why they did it. Morally though (and I would argue civilly) it was wildly irresponsible. Thousands of people lost their jobs, hundreds of people are now forced to work at Elons insane business under threat of deportation if their visa is invalidated, and hundreds of millions lost a trusted, dependable direct link to governments, public figures, and other notable people. The world is a worse place for having let this deal happen. What is responsible financially is often irresponsible in pretty much every other way, and I wish this perspective was represented more.

          As a shareholder in a number of other large corporations, I would actively like for buy-outs like this one to fail, even if it would make me a quick buck now, even if that quick buck is a lot. I much prefer stability to major erratic changes, even when they benefit me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            An easy counterpoint to what you just said: mahney. Nobody cares about doing the responsible thing when billions are on the line. Also, a lot of people say they wouldn’t do something for a billion dollars which just boils down to “you didn’t get a chance like that and you never will”. Hypotheticals are easy till it actually happens to you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              I have morals that I will not violate. Money does not matter to me beyond enough to comfortably live on my own (and I have reached that point already). I give the rest away to people in need, because that’s how my moral system works. You’re welcome to think whatever you want about hypotheticals, but in this case it doesn’t matter if they sold or not. The people making this deal would have been obscenely rich either way. At a certain point, money is nothing more than bragging about a big number, your life doesn’t get materially different. If your moral system allows for that kind of action, good for you I suppose, but I can assure you its far from a universal perspective.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            212 years ago

            hundreds of millions lost a trusted, dependable direct link to governments, public figures, and other notable people.

            It should not have been trusted and pervasive to such an extent. If anything, better to cut the dependency now than later.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              That’s a fair argument, and to an extent I agree. That said, I don’t think firebombing something hundreds of millions depend on is not the ideal solution, and it could have been handled differently, like by adding contingencies, for example. Or working in some form of transition period.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                In an ideal world, yes. But face it, you, I, and my aunt’s puppy knows that’d never happen. Get every govt agency in the world to cooperate? Yeah right. This might have been one of the best ways we could realistically have ended it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  I disagree. Nationalizing Twitter is definitely idealistic thinking, but adding some small contingencies to the deal definitely is not, and is actually pretty standard in large mergers, to maintain stability.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Yeah. I left with the bluetlicker shitstain bump up in every reply. The dumbest people to ever buy a device and learn English that somehow didn’t choke on rocks as a kid…

      Just had enough and had to leave

  • pirate fish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    I made a mastodon account but there aren’t as many meme feeds on mastodon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      That’s my problem too. Weird Twitter just doesn’t seem to be a thing on mastodon , or if it is the lack of an algorithm makes it hard to find the right kind of accounts to follow

    • Matt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      They definitely exist - quite a lot of them in fact - it’s just after the big migrations in 2022, the kind of people who tend to get popular on Mastodon are the more “serious” posters, as they’ve eclipsed the memers in popularity. (Eternal September kind of thing)

      If you check out the explore and local feeds of instances such as Wet Dry World or Beige Party, you’ll find the meme posters, who you can then follow.

      What doesn’t help either is that meme posters never use hashtags, even though they’re the primary way to be discovered on Mastodon. On the other hand, people who are posting “serious” takes tend to use hashtags a lot - this also helps skew the meme posters away from people. Unfortunately, hashtags have gone completely out of vogue and just aren’t used by most people.

      Mastodon is implementing full text search soon though, most likely with 4.2.0 (the next version), which should hopefully make things easier.

  • jerome
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Do you guys remember when I ordered that salad and when they brought it out, it was really really big.

  • arglebargle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    I am so annoyed that Twitter got ruined.

    Don’t get me wrong. I don’t like Twitter. I don’t follow anyone on Twitter. But if I had no other recourse I could complain about a corporation that wasn’t paying any attention to me and they would do something about it.

    By the way fuck FedEX. Is there a place on mastadon I can bitch about FedEx? I have had a mis-delivered package sitting on my porch for over a month. I call about every three or four days and tell them, pick up your package so it can go to the right place. They say they will get it. They never do.

    Never use FedEx.

    • nik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Is there a place on mastadon I can bitch about FedEx?

      #fuckfedex #fedex

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Fuck FedEx. Whenever a signature is required, they won’t let me have the package held for pickup anywhere, so I get door tags… even if I’m sitting on the couch watching TV. Called them and they said they don’t require the drivers to knock or ring. I only figured out after a ton of aggravation that if you get three door tags, they will hold the package for pickup for a few days anyway (even though they say they can’t due to “shipper restrictions”).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 years ago

    I’ve been trying to stick to Mastodon and ditch Twitter, but honestly, even though I’ve gotten into the habit of using Mastodon every day, it’s pretty hard for me to resist accepting information from Twitter.

    • drewofdoom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 years ago

      It’s ok to get information from places like X/Twitter or Reddit. It’s even fine to have an account. But it’s better to post your OWN material to platforms that best align with your sensibilities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        This. I still lurk reddit for information, but I will never contribute. Advertisers these days only care about interaction anyway, so I doubt lurking significantly impacts the profitability one way or the other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          I think you should do you and browse whatever you want. I still use Reddit when looking for opinions on products and services because there’s nothing close to the discussion on there. But visiting the site (without an adblocker) 100% still generates ad revenue and is what matters to ad companies, regardless of actually participating in the discussion.

          • benji
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            The clicks, even with an adblocker, are still worth something, right? Especially if they’re tied to an account.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      My issue with Mastodon is that many big companies still use Twitter/X as their main way to publish news outside of of their websites and press releases.

      • TheWoozy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’m not usually interested in what big companies have to say, but I follow some journalists who fortunately cross post to Mastodon, but all discussion takes place on elmo’s X site.

    • mihor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      What? I’ve been using Squawker and lately it stopped working because monkey boy elon borked something again in the twitter api. No tweets for me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    Fuck spez. Why isn’t he doing more psycho shit like Elon so he can move more people to Lemmy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    Apparently, as a competitor of any major platform you just need to get close to the features your adversary has and wait for that site/service to start the process of enshittification, let’s see if reddit makes more blunders

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I feel that reddit is already at this stage. It started feeling more like a half-bombed corporate minefield so I decided to flee the site one week ago. This site feels much more like things should be. You can even browse on a decent site on your phone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There’s an ethical consideration when you sell a company. Dorsey and co. took a big payout and this is the result. I was thinking earlier about how this probably wouldn’t have been happened if you had an even equity split across the company’s employees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I recall Dorsey publicly coming out in support of Elon’s Twitter well after the sale. Maybe there was no ethical conflict for Dorsey and he likes what he sees.

      Yeah, maybe all of this wouldn’t have happened if the equity was split among the employees.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Showing ongoing public support is often written into the contract with these big deals; Dorsey probably has to say he supports Musk for a few years at least

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      It was a corporation. Corporations exist to get shareholders paid. You can’t expect those to not be for sale for the right price, which in this case was more than it was worth. If you want the people running companies to make decisions based on ethics, you should ban publicly traded corporations first otherwise it’s just not happening.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You’re right, this is the only decision where we can’t judge Dorsey’s ethics, and we should be attacking a dozen other positions and mistakes he’s made. If it would even help; twitter addicts probably don’t wanna hear it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I mean, they routinely make the unethical decision. They probably wouldn’t be in the position to make it in the first place if they didn’t already have dollar signs in their eyes. And I’ve been around enough tech companies to know that’s usually the way it breaks down.

  • Beefalo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    that’s cool. The Masto instance I’ve been on for the last half year is no longer available and I’ll have to start over because I didn’t have a main and a back up account like I ended up with on Lemmy, but sure, that’s alright. I have no idea what happened, the instance still has a blank page up, but it ain’t Mastodon.

    I was finally feeling moved in but now, kaput.

    I don’t think this thing was really ready for absolutely everyone on Twitter to bail onto it, is the problem. I don’t think it was ever supposed to be. It was always supposed to be like a clubhouse for people who didn’t mind being the dweebs of the internet.

    • ✖️ 🇨 ✖️ 🇨 🐝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      For everyone on Twitter to bail onto it there would need to be an instance with the same level of funding and infrastructure as Twitter to support it.

    • Kaldo
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Mastodon will never be a twitter replacement simply because of lack of algorithm and proper content discovery, but seemingly the devs and admins there are fine with it and prefer it that way. It is definitely not filling my need for curated news and discovery of new interests that twitter used to provide before it went to shit, seems like bluesky might take over that function since most big content creators are shilling their bs pages nowadays.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Mastodon doesn’t want to replace twitter. Twitter is shit. Mastodon is already far better than twitter. Mastodon depends on twitter continuing to exist so that twitter can suck up all the shit and leave the rest of us in peace.

        If you were getting your news from Twitter, it probably turned you into an idiot already! So no worries.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        The lack of algorithms is what a lot of Mastodon users like about the platform. Many just want a timeline of posts of the accounts nd hashtags they follow.

        There is also room for both to exist, one doesn’t have to replace the other.

        • Kaldo
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That’s pretty much what I said, and I’m not saying its the wrong choice for them - it just means that Mastodon can never be the replacement for twitter, yet people keep bringing it up as an alternative. I personally want news that I care about and on mastodon it all gets buried in a chronological feed filled with irrelevant stuff I don’t care about. I’d probably like it if it only consisted of close friends that I care about, so its like a tightly knit social network, but not when its randoms across the world with some very hot or annoying takes.

          And I’d love an alternative but bluesky is gonna have the same issue as twitter, its owned by the same type of people and actually funded by twitter the company from what i read. It’s just trading one devil for another.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    It won’t last unless Mastadon gets some serious improvements. It’s buggy, glitchy, feature-poor, and confusing to use. There’s no way in its current state it’s going to compete with the big guys for the average person’s attention.

    • Rob T Firefly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      From a user-experience standpoint I’m intrigued by the idea of someone who is comfortable using Lemmy finding Mastodon confusing to use. From a technical view it’s literally the same stuff (ActivityPub + a distributed network) fueling the same general concept (federated social media) just with a different skin on top (Twitter/Tweetdeck-flavored instead of Reddit-flavored.)

      It’s all just decentralized online community organized by interest; a /c/ here is a hashtag on Mastodon. If you have already come to terms with instances and federation and such in order to use one, what about the other still confuses? Is it just the interface or are there deeper pain points?

    • 4grams
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Do you remember the early days of social media? IMHO, as the new hotness I’ve seen a rapid pace of improvements that I honestly expect to ramp up further as more utilization comes. Pure speculation but I’m basing it on my grey beard and the refreshing experience I’m having here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I mean, they need to ramp it way faster. It’s pretty garbage right now and there’s really no excuse. Compare it to Lemmy and it’s very obvious. Lemmy still has problems, but it’s much easier to use and has way fewer bugs and glitches. If you’re used to Reddit, then switching to Lemmy is pretty easy to do, and I can see average users making that jump. But Mastadon isn’t even close to the user experience that Twitter/X offered, and I cannot see the average Twitter user sticking around and waiting for all the issue to be fixed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I switched from Reddit to Lemmy today and I fully condone your comment. I decided to not use any microblogging service before using mastodon after Twitter. The switch from Reddit to Lemmy was a bliss.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I’ve had no issues on Mastodon.World and the advance features are essentially tweetdeck.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      It’s buggy, glitchy

      I haven’t seen any glitches or bugs for quite a while.

      Which ones are you speaking of?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I don’t think I cared about Twitter, the entire duration of its existence, and now there’s a whole new thing that’s apparently the same and I still don’t care about