• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      38
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Sorry, you must have missed the meeting, we do not do repercussions for anyone worth more than $1 million and a light skin tone. As punishment, we will just give him a high-paying political pundit job on OAN. Thank you for your concerns and please get fucked. Sincerely, United States Judicial System.

      Edit: I can’t spell

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    505 months ago

    I seem to recall this asshat and his best buddy Fred Flintstone MTG going on about “groomers” all the time.

    Looks like we found the actual groomer.

    And as usual, it’s ALWAYS projection with the qons. Always.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 months ago

    And Congress knew and knows about others yet they think that they should still be the ones leading our representative government.

    Why are these people living on the people ?

  • baltakatei
    link
    fedilink
    1055 months ago

    Fixed: Matt Gaetz, former Trump AG pick, had sex with raped an underage girl while in Congress, House Ethics report says

    A minor cannot consent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      I don’t know about this case, I can definitely imagine him raping that girl.

      But from a European perspective, saying minors cannot consent is definitely one of these very stupid US takes. It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.
      Obviously, minors can generally be influenced more easily than older people, and it’s important to have safeguards in place, but such a statement is just genuinely ridiculous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        It is honestly insane that in the US 18 is treated like a god, and if one partner is some months older, it’s illegal.

        You’ll be relieved to know that this is never the case.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Let me tell you about Wisconsin: We regularly bump 17-year-old offenders into adult court. So, yes, we have had cases of 17-year-old couples tried as adults for having sex with a minor after they had sex with each other.

          If the implication of that fact hasn’t sunk in I’ll make it explicit: We treat them as adults for the purposes of being a criminal, and a minor for the purposes of being a victim.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            Ok that one is on me. I don’t know why I expected Romeo and Juliet clauses to have some level of consistency in all states.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        85 months ago

        That’s not the case in this scenario, and rarely is. It varies by state, but Romeo and Juliet laws are common, which cover these kinds of circumstances.

        Basically, the law will set an acceptable age gap where consent can happen; If the gap is 5 years, then a 17 year old won’t be able to consent to sex with a 30 year old, but can with an 18-22 year old. So it helps maintain the “this is obviously a child who was groomed by a creepy middle-aged person” statutory rape laws, while still allowing kids to date each other.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          In some states they just straight up do the European thing where all that matters is being at least 16. In my state the age of consent is 16 and that’s also the age where you can be tried as an adult. They recently voted on whether or not to raise the age, and they decided no.

          There is still push for that to be changed, though only for the age of being tried as an adult. The former they’re kinda keen on keeping where it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      245 months ago

      In Florida a 17 year old can consent.

      Matt Gaetz being older than 24 is the illegal part. He groomed a young girl.

      Also, because he paid her, then the offense involves the procurement of a person who is under 18 years of age, so the charge increases to a second degree felony, which can result in up to 15 years of imprisonment, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        No she couldn’t consent to anyone over 24, which he was. Also, I would have to play catch-up, but if this is one of the girls he flew to New Jersey to have sex with… It’s sex trafficking a minor right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          I think consent is the wrong word here. A 17 year old can consent to a subgroup of people (under 24). Therfore she is above the age of consent.

          The girl has full control over her decisions but, more importantly, should not be charged with any crime.

          Gaetz on the other hand …

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Consent is tied to legality. You can consent to a credit card at 18 but not 17.

            I can tell someone it’s fine to punch me in the face, and you could call that consent. When the person next door sees it out the window and calls the police, they show up and will arrest them. Both parties say they approved of it and no one wants to press charges. Tough shit, if they follow the law they arrest the person, charges for assault are placed against the person who punched by the State it happened in.

            The “victim” who thinks they consented can tell the state prosecutor they don’t want there to be charges when they get a subpeno to show in court.

            So did I ever actually give consent? No… I never had legal right to at any age.

            (There are some loop holes in a few states, and ways to get out of it, but you get the point)

            Note: This is a another huge example of how laws are broken and ignored by companies and people with money as well. An NFL contract may list that consent was placed to be hit during a tackle, but when a play is over and someone intentionally kicks someone in the ribs, slams someone’s head down into the ground again or hits a player the league “fines them or suspends them” but they are criminal charges so they should be out in front of a judge. Why would they be exempt from the law.

            Fun example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CgjAN_wgmiI

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                You have no idea how assault charges go. The charges are from the State, not a person. It isn’t a civil case. (Also you could be in another country, so maybe it is different in your country)

                Also a civil suit can be filed separately for restitution by the person. So you could have criminal and civil suits side by side

                Note: most domestic violence charges in the U.S. the partner does NOT want charges to be placed.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  “the charges come form the state” So there are charges. That’s what I said. Are you slow???

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                35 months ago

                That’s not how criminal law works, actually. In criminal courts the State brings charges regardless of the victims wishes.

                Is there a c/confidentlyincorrect ?

      • Tiefling IRL
        link
        fedilink
        175 months ago

        If it only costs $10,000 to do that then it’s only illegal for poor people

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      I dunno, maybe the fact that he sent money to a guy on several occasions, who then sent that exact amount to multiple different young girls, and the that guy also got convicted for sex trafficking? Like fuckin years ago??

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Huh? No? Do you not know how Lemmy works? That link at the top is to an article written by a journalist. That is where this information comes from.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      535 months ago

      You mean the evidence collected by the bipartisan congressional committee investigating the credible and substantiated rape allegations against Matt Gaetz?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        I think the secret to enjoying the Internet is s just always assuming /s when you are unsure

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Read their posts. Guy is as anti Muslim as you can get. Like, it’s his mission to be the most hateful, racist, bigoted person on earth. While breathing their own farts as absolute truth.

        They’re worse than a troll.

        They’re an angry fucking moron.

          • masterofn001
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I wasn’t talking about you. I was talking to you.

            Buy thanks for playing.

            I was talking about the guy with the username Allah. The guy you think supports Islam.

            You’re so hateful you can’t even see you attacked your own hatebuddy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      But I was told by someone here on lemmy that there wasn’t possibly time to lay charges, since we only learned about last month!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    155 months ago

    How could he possibly not? How could people look at him and think he wouldn’t? The dude FUCKING looks like some sort of evil villain. That or a Dollar Tree Beavis.

    I knew about this years ago. You knew about it. Our neighbors knew about. But still we gotta go through this wishy washy bullshit from those who are supposed to be leaders saying that this is all suddenly “coming to light”. Fuck no it isn’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      I think it’s a perfect time to realize that there are perverts on both sides of the aisle, and neither aisle cares about their constituents.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        Well yeah but we’re not born rich to the ruling class. Our fathers and grandfathers weren’t Senators like Mattys were.

        Rules for thee, not for me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Hahaha you expect politicians to hold themselves accountable!? That would take things like integrity and honesty. You know honor, that thing the we just voted to kill forever.