• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Yes, but there’s no reason it can’t be streamed at exactly the same bitrate if you have a decent connection. They’re both just data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Not that there aren’t significant advantages to things like ownership comparing to licensing fees, but this article seems like satire.

    People without kids liking bluey?
    People like it enough, that they buy the soundtrack to a tv show for toddlers, one that they have no nostalgia for, and also buying it on vinyl?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 months ago

    Where is a good place to buy physical media? I recently got a Blu Ray player and have been picking up some movies and a couple of shows. If I’m really honest about it the selection seems kind of limited. I’ve been browsing Gruv anr Amazon.

    Might just be me not remembering how to shop for movies though. If so any pointers?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Why so the conversation centered around physical vs streaming???

    But a cheap pc and use it to stream locally (plex, jellyfin, etc) and you’ll have no real data loss and it will look just as good without having to fuck around with discs and dvd/bluray/whatever drives.

    Fuck streaming services, fuck physical media, learn to manage it yourself and you’ll never cry about scratched disks, dead lasers, whatever else you have with physical, along with the bad downscaling, bad pricing, roving licenses of streaming services

  • lemmyng
    link
    fedilink
    English
    415 months ago

    Physical media without DRM is better than streaming.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      275 months ago

      There’s a funny story about DRM on physical media.

      When Sony/Philips/etc. were first designing the Audio CD format, they didn’t bother adding any DRM or copy protection schemes, as they figured that no one would have the capability to rip them to their devices. And then CD burners/rippers entered the market, which proved them terribly wrong. In later years, the record companies tried adding DRM to CDs, but that came back to bite them when someone sued them, because the CD wouldn’t work in their player.

      So, long story short, CDs are legally prohibited from having DRM of any kind.

      • lemmyng
        link
        fedilink
        English
        195 months ago

        My not-so-funny story is: about a decade or so ago I had an Xbox with a blu-ray drive. I wanted to watch one of my discs on it, but couldn’t because the Microsoft DRM servers were down.

        The end.

        • circuitfarmer
          link
          fedilink
          115 months ago

          The irony is that some folks probably skipped Blu-Ray on purpose because they didn’t like the DRM. Then they got streaming instead, partly because Blu-Ray sales flattened which allowed the industry to more quickly focus on streaming and subscriptions.

          Had more people bought into Blu-Ray despite the DRM, it would be more difficult for the industry to get away from physical media.

          But this is a common trick, also. Both streaming and DRM are bad. The optimal solution (physical media without DRM) is something the industry just won’t do.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            55 months ago

            The irony is that some folks probably skipped Blu-Ray on purpose because they didn’t like the DRM.

            Yep! I sure did!

            Then they got streaming instead, partly because Blu-Ray sales flattened which allowed the industry to more quickly focus on streaming and subscriptions.

            Yeah. That too. Damn it.

            Now I’m buying DVDs, again.

            I would be amazing at piracy, but I have too much to lose.

            • circuitfarmer
              link
              fedilink
              75 months ago

              It is probably worth mentioning that Blu-Ray DRM at this point isn’t the pain it used to be – in fact Blu-Ray can also be ripped like DVD, so it’s still an option if you want a hard copy of something in HD (specifically 1080p Blu-Ray – 4K Blu-Ray is a different beast).

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          That sucks, I’m sorry to hear.

          The Blu-ray DRM isn’t as bad now, because everyone’s focused on digital and streaming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    225 months ago

    DVD extras forever.

    I got a special edition of ‘Buckaroo Banzai’ with an added on-screen commentary that is hilarious.

    In the original, we see BB get into his JetCar with a brief case. Thanks to the subtitles, we know he’s heading into the 8th Dimension carrying Einstein’s brain and a tuna fish sandwich.

    • BougieBirdie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      That must be in case he needs to stop for lunch on the way to delivering that sandwich

  • Agathon 🏴‍☠️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    805 months ago

    I’m tired of pretending [piracy of lossless rips of] physical media isn’t still better than streaming digital.

    It is fun to own a physical version for my favorites though. Especially when effort goes into crafting an actual souvenir and not just a money-grab.

    • Prox
      link
      fedilink
      35 months ago

      Okay, but this still requires the physical version, so the author’s premise holds.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      155 months ago

      Yeah, I haven’t dealt with actual physical media before Netflix was even an option. Piracy is becoming the best experience again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      This is basically my pseudo-legal solution to modern media collection and consumption.

      I buy physical copies (or get DRM-free downloads) of the stuff I intend to keep and use more than once or twice, making my own rips using the settings I like.

      Then I subscribe to streaming services that have all the other stuff I want… and just pirate it instead of using the service. Because torrenting and queuing media on my computer or phone is easier than using their players! I can download Japanese TV shows and find fanmade subtitles for them even if the streamer doesn’t have it. I can shoot the content to any device I own. To multiple devices at once. I can make screenshots. It’s the experience streaming platforms SHOULD be offering.

      No, officer, I paid for it. But because their software is shit I rolled my own stream of their content. No sudden quality drops, no freezes, no “you cannot play this file you downloaded to your device because we cannot ping the home server” bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      195 months ago

      I like collector’s editions that are actually nice. I have an edition of Dune (1984) on DVD that includes multiple versions, the soundtrack and an actual frame from a movie roll.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t have the space. I have bought a few digital copies of films where the price was the same as renting it and it wasn’t available to stream on the single streaming service I actually pay for. But I don’t hold much stock in the idea that translates to ownership. The thing is, I’ve owned albums on CD and damaged or lost them, and I don’t “own” those anymore because I only owned that copy. I’ve also owned plenty of games and DVDs and I’ve no idea where those are either. Meanwhile I went to buy Dungeon Keeper on GOG when I had some unplanned “time off” work, and it turns out I already bought it years ago. So perhaps digital ownership does work a little bit, sometimes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      This is where the high seas come in. Digital copy, your the owner. (i ofc mean copies of things you paid for and used the high seas to backup)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        I’m not as talented as I used to be in that regard. It all seems pretty inaccessible nowadays.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    I want cartridge based physical media like how Nintendo does it. DVD storage is my main issue but if I could do the significantly smaller size I would buy way more

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      I talked about this in another thread, but there are many reasons we do not use SD cards/flash memory devices for movies and TV:

      • SD cards have extrenely slow read rates compared to optical.
      • Optical discs are a much more reliable data storage format than flash memory devices. SD cards and other flash memory devices need to be used every few months, or the electric charge will wear out, causing the data to be unreadable. On the other hand, a professionally-pressed Blu-ray disc can theoretically last 50-100 years.
      • SD cards are more expensive to manufacture than optical discs.
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        I pulled an SD card out of the cupboard I literally haven’t touched in ten years and not a single file’s checksum had changed

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        I think their point is more putting technical or commercial feasibility aside, cartridges would be the better UX. I agree with that sentiment, cartidges are way cooler.

        There are large communities around cassette futurism/retro futurism for a reason. There is something much more satisfying about thwacking in a cartridge than inserting a disk or just pressing play on a screen.

        You are right that as things are disks make more sense, but it’s a different discussion. what is vs what ought to be

        In a perfect world I’d rather have storage crystals with programmable stable display voxels inside. But that’s not realistic any time soon sadly.

  • Miles O'Brien
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    As I’ve been getting more physical copies of my favorites, I’ve been looking into backing up all my physical dvds on digital storage so I don’t have to handle the actual dvd and risk scratching it.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65 months ago

    Streaming digital, and owning digital, are two different things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    155 months ago

    ease? Convenience? I ripped my physical media, stuffed it on my file server and now have both.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      I have a ton of my blurays and dvds ripped to my media server, but there are some films that aren’t worth the size. Anything recent that makes use of 4k/surround i like to watch on disc rather than take up 50GB on my drive. H265 makes this a little more bearable, but I’m also really lazy and I don’t watch the high bitrate stuff THAT often.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    the biggest flaw with streaming is the inconsistency of connection, and the very inopportune moments that the suspension of disbelief in storytelling can be marked by glitches on any platform.

    Are we going to pretend discs can’t get scratched? I’ve had to deal with a lot more broken discs then glitchs with Netflix, which are essentially non-existant these days.

    The biggest flaw with physical media is you have to pay 30$ for a 2 hour movie. The amount of money my parents spent buying and renting movies when I was a kid is mind boggling. A TV series was like 80$.

    Streaming is insanely convenient compared to physical. It sucks we don’t have extras but jfc, physical is not better. Not to mention the pollution it brings about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Not to mention the pollution

      Have you done a study of physical media vs all the infrastructure and maintenance required for streaming?

      I feel like we really don’t know which is worse/better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        From what I understand, it’s about equivalent but only because people are able to watch a lot more.

        The average family before streaming would maybe buy a movie once a month. Now we can binge watch a different series every few days. If we compare 2 hours of streaming to one movie, streaming wins, but we watch much more media then we used to which makes up for the difference.

        Also imporrant to note that this is going down as the grid slowly drifts towards renewable. The environmental cost of Blu-ray won’t be going down in the next decade.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yes, it is better. In the process of enshitification, lossy compression got used more and more aggressively in streaming, to save bandwith and storage costs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      People remember back to scratches on DVDs, but protection from scratches is built into the bluray spec. It’s not a problem anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Here in Australia physical media releases are becoming more rare, or we don’t get the 4k releases. Disney and Disney owned studios are gone, and paramount is becoming rare. I understand we are a smaller market, but it still a pain, I subscribe to Disney+ but the day might come when I dont want to, and only want the movies or shows I actually want to watch again. I understand there is a component of manufacturing and shipping in a reduced market, seriously just sell me the file DRM free in AV1, I’ll throw it on my jellyfin server, if ebooks and music can do it, what makes TV and Movies so special - but that’s it, its about control