• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It would be a great time to be a VPN company right now.

    Edit: On second thoughts, this is great, because it normalizes VPN usage too

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      You don’t think it would be simpler to just use one of the fifty thousand other free sites?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Honestly? Probably not. Pornhub is far and away the best porn site out there in terms of selection, ease of use, speed, and most importantly, they have the least annoying ads of any porn site I’ve ever been to. Other porn sites really don’t even come close

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      Not for long, with Net Neutrality forever murdered yesterday, ISPs will soon be blocking VPNs with aplomb and pushing their own. The whole Internet will become airplane WiFi.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        We’re sorry, you seem to have an unacceptable amount of uncategorizable traffic. Please refer to our terms of service policy and upgrade your account accordingly to proceed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2016 months ago

    Picture conservative white southern men who never got their GED trying to frantically Google what a VPN is, because they’re missing their interracial porn before the Klan meeting that night.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    86 months ago

    I live in a state where it’s not banned and it’s so annoying when iCloud Relay routes through one of the states in the South. I need to turn iCloud Relay off and proceed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    436 months ago

    I hope PH is putting a list with the names of the representatives who are responsible for this on the home page for those states. With phone numbers and mail addresses of the reps offices.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    e621 was blocked in my state and… then they realized the law wasn’t being enforced and unblocked themselves

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    136 months ago

    Now they can all rest easy that their liitle romps with their sister-cousins won’t be seen by the rest of the family

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    84
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So people better understand: Pornhub did not get banned by law. There is a law that requires porn sites to verify age with IDs in many southern states. Instead of complying Pornhub location banned themselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      156 months ago

      giving a scan of your ID to the shadiest people on the web doesn’t seem a smart idea.

      also: it’s not impossible for little jimmy to get a copy of his dad driving license…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      honestly that’s based as fuck. I wouldn’t think the largest porn website would have the ethics to lose out on that much money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      I work for municipal government in Texas and I’m not allowed to write down or take a picture of someone’s DL number or date of birth, which is a bitch when we’re trying to cite a contractor named Jose Gonzales for illegal construction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      486 months ago

      This rule is a trap. They are supposed to do it but there is no way to do this reliably (not even mentioning privacy issues).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      886 months ago

      You left the most important part out; why is PornHub not complying? Understanding the situation requires knowing the very real concerns about privacy and data security as compliance requires keeping copies of IDs on file for verification.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        786 months ago

        IOW: Pornhub refuses to attempt to secure the PII of everyone who wants to visit the site. It’s not within their scope and any website that agrees to do this bullshit is suspect as fuck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          236 months ago

          Afaik Pornhub is based in Québec, which has data privacy/protection laws through law 25 (French, will need to translate it). I’ve had some experience with it on some projects in the last few years, would not surprise me if that was contributing to the decision as well. I’m assuming they would still need to adhere to law 25 and whatever local laws in locations they operate in, could totally be wrong there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            126 months ago

            Poilievre has stated he wants to introduce the same age verification laws, so it will be interesting to see how Pornhub reacts to those laws once they are introduced especially since they’re based in Québec like you said.

            Personally, I’ve been stocking up, because you never know when there’s going to be a drought and it always helps to be prepared in life. I think we are in for some very dark years ahead of us.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Well I mean you gotta do what you gotta do, you never know what the future will look like lol

                I think it’s just the tip of the iceberg unfortunately lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          Especially for something socially embarrassing. That’s just building a blackmail database. Sure, porn use isn’t going to significantly compromise a lot of people, but for some that could end marriages and careers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            Particularly if one were to stray out of the heterosexual category. I wouldn’t put it past any of those states.

        • veroxii
          link
          fedilink
          316 months ago

          Why? Because working from home? They don’t want people to do that either. Or they’ll have some sort of “you need to apply for a VPN license” law which achieves the same thing.

          • r00ty
            link
            fedilink
            76 months ago

            Well, I mean if you want to go down the 1984 route (I hope not), a VPN license is a great tool for achieving such things.

            I’ll give you an example, I have an amateur radio license in the UK. Part of the terms are that I must allow anyone authorised by Ofcom (the radio telecommunications agency over here) access to inspect my equipment and setup… Now ideally it would be in a building other than my house. But for most people, it would probably be in their house. So you need to let them in.

            VPN License? Well probably it would have the same terms. “Excuse me sir, we have detected the use of VPN traffic at these premises. We are warranted to enter the premises for the purpose of ensuring this traffic is related to the primary business as noted on your VPN license, please step aside from your computing devices”

            Alright, it won’t happen in reality. But, a lot of countries really have wanted to crack down on the use of encryption for some time now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              There are network architectures that do not uitlize a VPN. Zero trust, for example, should not use a VPN

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            266 months ago

            No. It’ll be “No VPN usage for residential use. Corporate is fine.” Then they have an excuse to sick the SS on you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          176 months ago

          The FBI has previously claimed Apple was helping terrorists by not unlocking iPhones. It’s not completely outside the realm of possibility, especially with the new psycho Trump nominated.

  • nifty
    link
    fedilink
    94
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is asinine, even when internet access to porn didn’t exist people had so much porn, and they’ll continue to get it. All this does is shift the business elsewhere.

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      746 months ago

      Yeah pornhub seems pretty legitimate and safe these days.

      All these bans do is force people to go to sketchier websites which don’t have as thorough vetting process for their videos and likely have a lot more illegal / harmful content.

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        Yeah pornhub seems pretty legitimate and safe these days.

        Yeah, they got threatened a few years ago with essentially banking cutting them off if they didn’t make a concerted effort to purge anything shady, which they achieved by purging basically all end-user uploads that weren’t verified models or studios.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          The secret cabal of lobbyists actually responsible for the bans.

          _____

          /s, in case it was really necessary

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            If it wasn’t for the level of utter incompetence and technophobia that politicians seem to radiate I would have genuinely bought into this idea. But there’s no way they would actually be bright enough to work a scheme like this out.

            • Zagorath
              link
              fedilink
              English
              56 months ago

              I don’t actually buy into the idea, but to play devil’s advocate a little more, the politicians don’t need to “be bright enough to work a scheme like this out”. The vpn industry lobbyists just need to tell them “hey it’d be really great if you banned porn: here’s a bill we wrote that you could use”, and then the pollies just need to go “yeah, sounds good.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      266 months ago

      It highlights that their elected officials are messing with something they like. It is also a lot safer for the business to block a geographic area than deal with PII.

      If they operate in those states they need to obtain proof of age. I don’t exactly know how that works, since I haven’t had to do it, but I imagine it is something like uploading a driver’s license picture. If you have all that personal information you have to protect it, or risk information disclosure and lawsuits. A porn favorites list and personal identity info together in the same system is just asking to be hacked.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      396 months ago

      Side subject, sorry for my aside: I’m starting to really get annoyed at the censorship on my instance.

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        416 months ago

        Weird, I’m a .world account too and I see what the comment said just fine

      • Lumelore (She/her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Kinda strange that world blocks that word. I’m on a queer instance and I can still see that word, in fact I don’t think I have ever encountered any removed words on my instance.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          I’m on .world and I see:

          granted, it was edited an hour after irreticent posted their comment, and I can’t see what it said before. (possibly the OC originally wrote “removed”?)

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            possibly the OC originally wrote “removed”?

            That is a possibility. It all seems weird to me.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              Agreed that’s weird, no question there, but I don’t think that’s on lemmy or .world. I’m pretty sure they don’t have the ability to censor specific words like that- the response from mods or admin would be to just remove the comment.

              Let’s just be honest, censoring single words is stupid. For one thing, I guarantee you my imagination is going to fill in a much interesting alternative.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                lemmy does have a regex based slur filter that replaces matched words with removed

                this one was likely caught by lemmy.ml if it was indeed the variant ending in nny, as that one is in their slur filter.

          • Lumelore (She/her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            That would be strange if Annisem literally wrote removed and then changed it to transexual later. Only reasons I can think of is that it was a bizarre attempt at trolling or they really did mean removed and then changed it because people thought it actually got removed. It’s also possible they did originally write a different word such as the t slur which they changed to transexual after seeing that what they originally wrote got removed.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              I’m not sure that .world or lemmy at large even has that ability. normally mods would just yeet the entire comment.

              It could have been an attempt at humor, or something. I dunno.

              What I do know is that it’s not censored now.

              • @[email protected]M
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                Lemmy does have the capability and some instances use it. I’m not exactly sure how it works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Should look at others.
        Unless you actually are a child who can’t handle reading magic words. Then you probably shouldn’t be online at all.

      • /home/pineapplelover
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        You can export all your subscriptions pretty easily so you can sign up to a different instance and import everything over. Check Lemmy settings.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I’m honestly curious what that porn fetish was that it was so bad to be censored. Anyone off-world able to enlighten me?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            That would be porn featuring people who were born as a boy or a girl by mistake, and who have since tried to put that right. Rocky Horror Picture Show has a “sweet” song with the word which is apparently problematic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    And yet when we pointed out that Project 2025 talked about banning porn, a lot of people didn’t think it was serious. This is just one way that such an idea can play out.

    I don’t think porn could ever be fully banned - prohibition doesn’t work. (Besides, I already made a promise to create erotic art specifically in order to spite any such enacted law.) But considering how modern porn and its variety has enabled many people to acquire niche preferences, this is still going to trigger a challenging time for a lot of people.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      216 months ago

      If this plays out like it’s played out in other countries the only people who will actually be prevented from accessing pornography will be lawmakers, because they’ll be the only people not tech savvy enough to be able to circumvent the restrictions.

      • skulblaka
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        They’ll just offer their nephew some robux and a job in state legislature in exchange for a couple felonies

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    366 months ago

    Literally 1984

    One of the things that stuck out to me while reading in school was the sexual frustration part