Kentucky dispatchers repeatedly told police officers the address of a house they were supposed to raid over an alleged stolen Weed Eater, only for the cops to raid the wrong home and kill the man inside.

But the man who police say admitted to stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge had already been in custody prior to the deadly raid that took place minutes before midnight last month, according to WLEX. That man told police he had stored the stolen Weed Eater at a home at 489 Vanzant Road which is a rural area outside of London city limits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely) or they intentionally raided the wrong home as an excuse to kill this man, perhaps under judges orders.

      • Robust Mirror
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        When you can’t tell if police killed someone through staggering incompetence or deliberate malice… something is fundamentally wrong.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        207 months ago

        Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely)

        did you mean to say incompetent? (genuine question)

  • Lovable Sidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Don Pardo, what do we have as lovely parting gifts for our widow?

    Welllll… Mrs. Dead Guy will receive this space-saving twin bed, and a year’s supply of Rice-a-Roni!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What’s it’s matter about the address. We are talking about a weed eater. Chill the fuck out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Ah, but the weed eater belonged to a judge. It wasn’t because he stole something valuable; It was because he stole from someone important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        He didn’t steal anything they had the thief. It was a recovery operation. You know it’s dangerous getting a weed eater from someone who doesn’t know they have it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      287 months ago

      Why did they even do anything? Whenever something is stolen from I get told there is nothing they can do but take a report.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        237 months ago

        I’m sure “judges weed eater” had nothing to do with the enhanced police response. /s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        Yeah, police are unwilling to do anything about vandalism in my neighborhood, smashed windows on homes and cars, 20+ smashed windows, everyone knows exactly who is doing it to the kid who goes around trying to jump kids in the area half their size and has been caught and witnesses red handed multiple times, ‘‘aww jeez guys, looks like… there’s nothing we can do…’’ useless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            We all bought ring doorbells with the nifty "YOU HAVE ACTIVATED A CAMERA! YOU ARE BEING RECORDED!‘’ on it, and people must be turning in videos because they blanketed the whole area in ‘‘General Warning to everyone, you can be evicted if your children vandalize or break into any apartment used or not’’ which really feels like a lawyer recommended move to make sure they can point to something and say ‘‘see it’s the same rules for everyone and everyone was told not just that one family’’

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    517 months ago

    There is more to this story that we will never know. You raid a home over a stolen fucking weed eater. Gross abuse of power by someone

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      I mean, the article plainly says that the weed eater belonged to a local judge.

      This dude wasn’t executed because of what he was accused of stealing. He was executed because of who he was accused of stealing it from.

      I can almost guarantee that some police higher-up is getting a free/cheap piece of “forfeited” property in the coming weeks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        The thief was in custody. They where just going to where the guy stashed it. Like why couldn’t they roll up in a patrol car and knock.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          I know, that’s why I said accused. The dude didn’t steal anything, but was still killed.

    • Subverb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      417 months ago

      No, it’s right there in the story. The weed eater belonged to a judge, so obviously someone’s gonna pay.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If only. Man, if only there were some Mario Bros that could handle something like this. They hate the forces of evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      167 months ago

      Even if it was the correct home. They killed the guy over a fucking weed eater. Even if he’d been violent back off and fucking let things cool down. Grab him when he goes for groceries or something. Fuck.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    507 months ago

    stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge

    Aha, so that’s why they suddenly give a shit about property theft, because it was from a member of their little club.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    167 months ago

    It sounds like the judge and police were working together to execute someone. I really can’t tell incompetence from pure evil anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 months ago

    This is a repeat post, so I’ll repeat one of my replies partially: I wouldn’t be surprised if a suddenly vacant lot wouldn’t suddenly be auctioned off to a cop’s relative in areas with a high predominance of this. Read up on civil asset forfeiture as well. In some places, cops are basically legalized mafias.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    187 months ago

    This happened in a state where the majority of residents (especially in these rural areas) feel everyone should be armed for protection. They are also overwhelmingly in favor of aggressive police tactics so when I see a rural man defending himself and being shot for it by police I can’t help but sigh. I mean, anyone with half a brain could see these situations coming. Do we really need to use swat teams for non violent property crimes?