• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 months ago

    According to a documentary I watched on television some years ago, there was an expected one death for every million dollars spent on a skyscraper

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      There is absolutely no way that’s correct. No one is expecting 500+ deaths on a construction site.

      I thought that maybe that documentary was referring to a specific time period so I looked into it…

      Empire State Building, 1929: 5 deaths and the building cost 41 million dollars.

      Sears Tower, 1973: 5 deaths, 175 million

      World Trade Center (full complex), 1973: 60 deaths, 1.5 billion

      The only skyscraper I found that is close to that figure is the Burj Khalifa (2010, 1.5 billion) which “unofficially” had hundreds of deaths. And even then… it’d need to be 1500 deaths to match that statistic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Still a far cry from 1 death per million dollars. Even what is considered the deadliest skyscraper construction in history (Burj Khalifa) is short.

          There’s no way that stat was ever true.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    A have a few old Mohawk friends from Six Nations who did this work. Most of the time, these guys were either hungover, drunk or high when they were doing this work. It was the only way to not be afraid of walking up there.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    When this labourer falls, its his employer’s insurance that is going to make a payout. The cost of the insurance policy is wrapped up into the contract price that the landowner paid to have the construction done. So ultimately it is the owner that looses out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So ultimately it is the owner that looses out.

      Meanwhile the worker is literally fucking dead and is minced meat on the ground in the pursuit of enriching their employer. But that doesn’t count as losing out apparently.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Of course it’s the owner that loses out. Maybe he even has to attend the funeral!

        Imagine how much that must cost!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Cost of doing business. He knew what he was getting into.

        If he wanted a safer job, he should have become a cop so he can just shoot whatever danger there is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          So if the owner gets guillotined or Luigi’d for exploiting their workers, that’s also cost of doing business right?

    • metaStatic
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      this is pure comedy gold and y’all just downvoting like dead peasant insurance pays out to the family or something.