• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2243 months ago

    On Feb. 15, 2003, millions of people marched in over 600 cities against the plans of U.S. President George W. Bush to invade Iraq.

    First time?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I hate finding out how my great grandparents felt in the early 1900’s – so ironic their children couldn’t care less about repeating history

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Many people’s great grandparents saw bad shit happen and then kept enabling it. Is it irony or plain ol’ stupidity?

          • ☂️-
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            its safer not to get involved. the downside is that the problem will not go away by itself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    143 months ago

    Protests alone will not stop the nazis. They also didn’t in Germany ~90 years ago. I hooe people get that and organize. Fast.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    For y’all who’ve never protested before… The reason why they don’t cover it is because they never cover protests (unless people actually FSU then it’s a “riot”)… Maybe if libs cared when it happened to activists for BLM, anti-genocide, etc… Now it’s just completely normal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    303 months ago

    We have always known that all broadcast and cable news media is tightly controlled. Hundreds of stations across America literally parrot word for word what each other says.

    Now we also know that all social media can also be controlled. There is nowhere safe except small communities that are not controlled by corporations or the government.

    They want us disorganized, poor, uneducated, and religious. This is their plan to reduce us to their serfs to be controlled and abused.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      The time to speak up was in November. All this was obvious. People voted for it (or stayed out).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Now all we can do is bask in privilege and talk about leopards for the next 4 years. It’s a glorious system! \s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Would you like a unicorn, too?

          Judges already decided that Trump is immune and he can pardon anyone who does his bidding. That ship has sailed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              I was with you from 2016 to 2020. But in 2024 the American people spoke.

              I admire your motivation but you’re in the minority. The majority is in the “this is fine” camp. Either support it, or don’t care.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 months ago

                OH but they already did shit. They did the only shit that they can do. They voted! Now they must accept the nazi rule as legit! There is no other way… \s

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  It IS legit. You may not agree, but they are the government. You can’t even accuse them of lying about it, they announced they would do it and people still elected them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Besides some barely visible posts and slightly suspicious on Lemmy, I literally heard nothing about this protest.

      Media will definitely downplay it, but this instance was obviously badly organised.

  • Elaine Cortez
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 months ago

    Great work to everyone who stands up to hatred and fascism! ❤️

    I watched some of the protests when they were live on YouTube. The fact there was apparently so little media coverage of people protesting against a fascist racist who appointed a Nazi as a special government employee and wants to annex Canada is simply mindboggling.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1023 months ago

    Fifty states, one message: we see through the facade. Simultaneous protests coast-to-coast, and the propaganda machines are in stealth mode. Convenient, isn’t it? A nation erupts, and the so-called “free press” opts for strategic amnesia.

    This isn’t apathy—it’s suppression. When every state rises up, the system panics. The Capitol steps become battlegrounds, yet the narrative is buried under celebrity gossip and stock market fluff. They’re scared. Scared of what happens when people realize that unity in dissent is their greatest weapon.

    Keep marching. If they won’t cover it, we’ll document it ourselves. The truth doesn’t need their permission to exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      Why don’t we start confronting news anchors? Start calling them out specifically for being silent. This could be in person or online or both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        How many news anchors are actually journalists? I get that they’re the face of TV news, but most of them are just people with pretty faces who can read from a teleprompter in an engaging way. This doesn’t excuse them from ignoring these issues any more than the producers or so many other people do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      they did this to “Occupy Wall Street” too… once they couldn’t ignore it anymore, they just made fun of them.
      as much as i hate protests blocking the freeway, because it’s dangerous and pisses off innocent people, it does manage to get you on the news….
      oh, also because it gives cops an excuse to raid you violently

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        243 months ago

        Exactly. They ran the same playbook with Occupy Wall Street—ignore, ridicule, and then unleash the riot squads when the message hits too close to home. It’s not about “safety” or “order”; it’s about silencing dissent before it becomes unmanageable.

        Blocking freeways? Sure, it’s inconvenient—but so is systemic corruption, unchecked corporate greed, and a government that treats its people like collateral damage. If a traffic jam is what it takes to make the propaganda machines blink, then so be it.

        And yeah, cops love an excuse to escalate. The state’s monopoly on violence doesn’t tolerate competition, even when it’s peaceful resistance. But let them overplay their hand—every raid, every crackdown only fuels the fire they’re desperate to extinguish.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          i don’t mind traffic jams, it’s stuff like medical emergencies being stuck in traffic, people driving freeway speeds and then coming across stopped traffic, activists getting run over by chuds… that sort of thing….

          but, traffic news has a broad market, and it pisses people off enough to go viral… i dunno, it’s effective….

          i liked how blm in portland kept finding dumpsters and lighting them on fire in the middle of the street… made for great pictures….
          but, every time a fire started, the cops switched to ultra-violent mode and a lot of people got seriously hurt… fire was always their legal justification….

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            73 months ago

            The system thrives on fear—fear of disruption, fear of unity, fear of people refusing to play by its rules. Blocking freeways isn’t the problem; it’s a mirror held up to a society that values convenience over justice. If ambulances can’t move, that’s not on the protesters—it’s on a government that built a house of cards where one roadblock collapses everything.

            But you’re right: fire is their favorite excuse. It’s not the flames they fear; it’s the spark in people’s minds. Every crackdown is their attempt to extinguish that spark before it spreads. The challenge isn’t just to disrupt but to outmaneuver their narratives.

            Keep pissing them off, but don’t hand them the script they’re desperate to use against us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      153 months ago

      Then we start picketing them, too. Right outside their media buildings, asking when they plan to grow a spine and start covering what’s happening. Add media companies to the places being protested and show what cowards they are.

  • شاهد على إبادة
    link
    fedilink
    723 months ago

    The largest protests in the history of the world were in opposition to the invasion of Iraq. The invasion of Iraq still happened.

    Protesting sends a message but it isn’t enough.

    • Natanox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      323 months ago

      If protests aren’t enough to sway a democratic system, then the democratic system is broken and resistance becomes mandatory. To quote what the german constitution established after Hitler to prevent exactly what’s currently happening again in the US:

      Article 20 [Constitutional principles - Right of resistance]

      […]

      (4) All Germans shall have the right to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order if no other remedy is available.

      I do not know if there’s something akin to this in the US constitution (I know your culture very much thinks there is every time it’s about guns though). But even if it isn’t, fuck it. The system is evidently broken, do what’s necessary to regain the power of the people. Do it the French way if you must.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        123 months ago

        (4) All Germans shall have the right to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order if no other remedy is available.

        Wow I love this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        In US, I think it was the initial intent of 2nd amendment. Arm the population not to resist an enemy or an invasion, but to resist its own government if it endanger a free state.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          Well with ±400 million guns circulating nationwide, and one in three people are gun owners, consider how many of them would use them in defense of the current government now. There’s a reason behind allowing 2A to go unchecked, when in the time it was written, it made sense. Now it’s a civilian army that, while keeping the population divided, a not insubstantial percentage will blindly defend any unjust actions this government decides to perpetrate.

          • Natanox
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            This. This kind of unchecked gun permissions only elevate the necessary revolt to a civil war. It doesn’t help fighting against regimes, on the contrary; it makes the fight extremely bloody. Those who wrote it in 17-something couldn’t know that, in the future, it will be the very fascist supporters who are the most heavily armed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      The media did the exact same thing too they had a bunch of Iraq war experts and nobody about why we shouldn’t go to war…

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      203 months ago

      There are people in every state that hate Trump. Unfortunately, in some states, those people are greatly outnumbered.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    503 months ago

    Elon and the felon: “Does their protesting stop what we’re doing in any way? No? Then why would I care?”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    583 months ago

    By all means, protest. Push these bad actors. Stick up for democracy! But Is anyone else mildly anxious that JD Vance’s hero, Curtis Yarvin, suggested in 2022, that all Trump needs to do is declare a state of emergency to extend executive immunity to prosecution, and to do it early on? So far, project 2025 combined with the manifestos of Dark Gothic Tech Bros are aligned.

    “If the institutions deny the President the Constitutional position he has legally won in the election, the voters will have to act directly. Trump will call his people into the streets—not at the end of his term, when he is most powerless; at the start, when he is most powerful. No one wants to see this nuclear option happen. Preparing for it and demonstrating the capacity to execute it will prevent it from having to happen.”

    Apr. 7, 2022 Curtis Yarvin

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      183 months ago

      But Is anyone else mildly anxious that JD Vance’s hero, Curtis Yarvin, suggested in 2022, that all Trump needs to do is declare a state of emergency to extend executive immunity to prosecution, and to do it early on? So far, project 2025 combined with the manifestos of Dark Gothic Tech Bros are aligned.

      I mean, yeah.