• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    702 years ago

    This song does such a good job with communicating the conservaive trinity:

    • persecution complex
    • mad about things they themselves voted for
    • mad that the other is getting something, which is obviously undeserved
          • Polymath
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Could someone copy the video to Piped somehow, for those of us not wanting to give clicks??
            IDK how to do it, otherwise I would

          • Liz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            It’s not exactly a lyrical masterpiece.

            Rich Men North of Richmond Lyrics

            [Verse 1]
            I’ve been sellin’ my soul, workin’ all day
            Overtime hours for bullshit pay
            So I can sit out here and waste my life away
            Drag back home and drown my troubles away

            [Pre-Chorus]
            It’s a damn shame what the world’s gotten to
            For people like me and people like you
            Wish I could just wake up and it not be true
            But it is, oh, it is

            [Chorus]
            Livin’ in the new world
            With an old soul
            These rich men north of Richmond
            Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
            Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
            And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do
            'Cause your dollar ain’t shit and it’s taxed to no end
            'Cause of rich men north of Richmond

            [Verse 2]
            I wish politicians would look out for miners
            And not just minors on an island somewhere
            Lord, we got folks in the street, ain’t got nothin’ to eat
            And the obese milkin’ welfare

            [Verse 3]
            Well, God, if you’re 5-foot-3 and you’re 300 pounds
            Taxes ought not to pay for your bags of fudge rounds
            Young men are puttin’ themselves six feet in the ground
            ‘Cause all this damn country does is keep on kickin’ them down

            [Pre-Chorus]
            Lord, it’s a damn shame what the world’s gotten to
            For people like me and people like you
            Wish I could just wake up and it not be true
            But it is, oh, it is

            [Chorus]
            Livin’ in the new world
            With an old soul
            These rich men north of Richmond
            Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
            Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
            And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do
            'Cause your dollar ain’t shit and it’s taxed to no end
            'Cause of rich men north of Richmond

            [Outro]
            I’ve been sellin’ my soul, workin’ all day
            Overtime hours for bullshit pay

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              222 years ago

              “I wish the government would help people.”

              Welfare exists.

              “No, not like that.”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              These lyrics reflect completely legitimate working class anxieties but supports the system that perpetuates them. “Taxed to no end,” the corporate tax rate has been brought down by lobbying for decades. The obese focus is on one hand legit since eating like shit is cheap, but it has blinders on about why that is, since it’s not convenient to their point.

              These parts are all completely legit, although the lyrics are pretty bad. The same things have been said by much better voices in much better ways.

              I’ve been sellin’ my soul, workin’ all day

              Overtime hours for bullshit pay

              So I can sit out here and waste my life away

              Drag back home and drown my troubles away

              Young men are puttin’ themselves six feet in the ground

              ‘Cause all this damn country does is keep on kickin’ them down

              Overall it’s a great example of politics in America right now and how the working class is exploited by the right wing, as well as how liberal media, in the mainstream “dialogue,” fails to address the working class anxieties and instead focuses on the “controversy” of the song. The coverage isn’t really about the lyrics, it’s about the way people are interpreting them politically, and it all favors and perpetuates the exact same system.

              • Liz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                Yeah, I totally agree with everything you said. The anxieties felt by people on the far right are real, they’ve just got a skewed perception of the cause of their problems.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                So persecuted that a bunch of rich guys put their thumbs on the scale and ascended his music to the charts because they agreed with the message. The Rich Men North of Richmond want total control, no not the ones I agree with, the other ones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In his interviews he claims he is a centrist but takes issues with teachers turning girls into boys and boys into girls.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    532 years ago

    Image Transcription:

    Picture of Oliver Anthony singing with the caption above: “When the government gives more of your tax money to corporations but you’re mad someone used EBT to buy snacks”

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please message and let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for images for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    422 years ago

    Anyone have the numbers of social welfare spending vs corporate welfare spending for a recent year? Say 2020-2022? I can’t find it.

    • Luccus
      link
      fedilink
      362 years ago

      I’m too lazy to look up the numbers, but I think the premise of this argument is rather weak.

      Money spend on social welfare, vastly improves poor people’s lives. When you spend it on corporate welfare, the money tends to go into the pockets of people who are already pretty comfortable.

      This is a simplification of a multifaceted issue, but by and large I think this holds a lot more water than just comparing numbers.

      Also: There was a pandemic in the time period given, so there might be some selection bias.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        Means testing is something that wastes a lot of public welfare funds and is usually a tool utilized by those who want to cut programs as an example of welfares inability to work. If we got rid of means testing then corporate welfare would be shown for how truly useless it is. I’m not arguing with you or anything, just adding some more detail to the topic

    • Loom In Essence
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Let’s be more specific and find out how much public money was spent on sugarry snacks for fat people, which is his ridiculous complaint. I’ll assume we’re not psychopaths who are generally against a social safety net.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      It depends on what exactly you consider social welfare and corporate welfare. There’s all sorts of ways to split the data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    312 years ago

    I legit actually like country music. Country music and punk rock. Both of them are just three chords and the truth

    And man, when this song started, dude came in hot. I loved it. And then he went flying right off the rails.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Exactly what I thought, the first verse and most of the chorus is legit working class anxiety. The rest is blaming other victims of the system, and while it references “rich men,” it contains no criticism of their wealth, the reference to taxes is more the opposite.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Well it kinda does criticize them, just only if they are located above a certain geographical point

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      A friend sent it to me, and at first I was hopeful… then I was like ‘hmm… strange choice of wording’ then I was like ‘oh, that was deliberate’ as it started to sound more like propaganda and less like a legitimate statement.

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You could be mad at both… why is this a black and white issue? EBT abuse is real.

    I have seen people literally sell the milk they get from EBT that was intended to be used for their baby. They bragged about being able to get the new iphone with it. I have seen homeless who buy bottled water on SNAP only to dump and resell the bottles so they could get cash for their addictions. Why would i not be mad at that just as I am at how corporate bailouts didnt help anyone except the top .01% of society?

    Edit: so many hexbears. I dont care to respond to Kremlin bots.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      wow, I can’t believe someone would commit moral failures such as buying an iphone. the absolute outrage.

      sounds like people shouldn’t be impoverished. that’s the conclusion you should be drawing, not this moral crusader thing of looking down your nose at impoverished people. If poor people are doing things you find distasteful, why not focus your energy on the people who create and spread poverty in the first place? and no, that’s not poor people. It’s the capitalists and their servants in the state

    • chauncey [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      332 years ago

      Ah yes someone selling a few dollars of milk is definitely the same as a corporation stealing millions. Ah yes. These two are the same.

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      Why would i not be mad at that just as I am at how corporate bailouts didnt help anyone except the top .01% of society?

      Scale. The amount that the capitalists steal from you is orders of magnitude larger than whatever infinitesimal amount of tax dollars (well, more accurately, cents) you lose because an unhoused person used a loophole to buy drugs. Personally I can’t even imagine being angry at the two people you mentioned. Nor is there a realistic way to prevent those things that wouldn’t punish the 99% of people who just use EBT to buy food like its intended.

      (I also really don’t care if people find a way to use EBT money to buy something else in general. Like I can’t think of a single reason to be bothered by that. And I life off EBT and only ever use it the “correct” way.)

    • WIIHAPPYFEW [he/him, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      “The homeless people were on the streets making welfare fraud and I saw one of the welfare frauds and the welfare fraud looked at me.”

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 years ago

      I have seen homeless who buy bottled water on SNAP only to dump and resell the bottles so they could get cash for their addictions.

      If you’re going to lie, why make up the most nonsensical lie imaginable?

      • Sinonatrix [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        I’ve seen this first hand a good few times - believe me or not because I don’t want to be too specific about my experience. You’ve got to be super desperate to pour out a 40 count of bottled water for $2-4, but people with nothing else but SNAP/EBT/etc funds will do it.

        It’s sad and wasteful, but it’s also such a marginal thing compared to the Sacklers making the opium wars look like a prank that I don’t see how it can even brought up in the same conversation - except as deflection.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          262 years ago

          I’ve seen no shortage of people reselling water bottles with water in them (common especially in places with lots of tourists) but just selling the fucking bottles?

          • Sinonatrix [comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            112 years ago

            If you live in a state with a bottle deposit. The $0.05-0.10 is paid with the government aid, but returned as cash to the redeemer. It’s a poor and laborious return on investment, but doesn’t require actually hustling to sell water like that to tourists.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          [Removed a bit too much hostility.]

          I work with homeless people, many of whom have substance abuse issues. I’ve heard of all sorts of ways to get money for drugs (by the way, $2-4 isn’t going to get that done, not even close) and have never heard of anything close to this ridiculous.

          It’s unbelievable. As someone else pointed out, with selling them you’re looking at $40, not $2-4, for standing at an intersection or in a park. And you don’t need to do it 30-40 times to get your fix.

      • American_Badass [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 years ago

        Surely it’s a bit, LMAO. How is that something that could even be witnessed? Where is the open air empt water bottle market even located? :data-laughing:

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          You can return empty bottles in some states, but it’s for 5 cents. The guy I spoke to last Thursday about his fentanyl addiction told me he needed about $100 to get his fix for the day back when he used. It’s just absurd.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        If you’re going to lie, why make up the most nonsensical lie imaginable?

        Worked for Reagan. freedom-and-democracy

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Yeah, rich people take orders of magnitudes more money from society in order to reinvest it in very concretely destroying society further, but did you consider that someone who was over-prescribed opiods as part of a deliberate campaign by the Sacklers also take up money coping with the addiction they ended up with?”

      Fuck off. There are important societal benefits to welfare, while corporate bailouts and the like are a cancer intended only to give the rich more money.

      • Infamousblt [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        No but I have seen homeless people picking up other’s littered recycling and taking it to the grocery store for the pennies deposit and that’s basically the same thing

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      492 years ago

      Idk man, just seems like small potatoes, and rare. Everyone has to eat and I find it doubtful that the skinny EBT amounts will fund an addict’s lifestyle significantly if the food is resold on the secondary market.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        When it comes to government waste? It’s not nothing, but I think you’re right, it is technically small potatoes. But it isn’t rare, I’ve heard 2 very credible firsthand accounts. The result of one I’ve actually witnessed, repeatedly.

        So idk exactly how that SNAP/EBT stuff works, but it’s just a certain amount loaded up on a card. I thought it was $200, and $200 went a hell of a lot further in 2017. My friend had a deal worked out with his neighbor, he’d “purchase” that $200 SNAP/EBT card for $100. They’d take that to the store & eat really, really well! 😂

        We justified playing into it because if we didn’t buy it, they’d just sell it to somebody else. So why not us? Why shouldn’t we get the food? But yeah those neighbors wanted $100 CASH more than a $200 card to buy food. Is this behavior rare?..probably not as rare as you think. But definitely not common, and small potatoes.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.” ― Anatole France

    • AcidSmiley [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      Why would i not be mad at that just as I am at how corporate bailouts didnt help anyone except the top .01% of society?

      You could start by having the tiniest bit of class consciousness instead of being a fucking serf.

    • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      332 years ago

      If you are more angry against some poor people addicted to opioids than you are against the billionaire oligarchs who made their money off of addicting millions of people to opioids… you might have a severe case of myopia.

    • eatmyass [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah man, I live in a fucking nice apartment and make enough money that I can sit on my ass listening to racist fake bluegrass and posting on obscure Internet forums, my entire life rests upon a literal mountain of human suffering that I am blessed never to have to come into contact with. But you know what I’m really mad about? A homeless dude making $3.

      Post hog liberal

  • SootySootySoot [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Corporate subsidies and corporate tax evasion are always in competition for big dollar values. Not to mention unpaid wages.

    Meanwhile there are POOR people getting some FOOD??!??!?

  • Takatakatakatakatak
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    It’s pretty funny that the expectation on any man who picks up a guitar these days is not that he has a decent voice to go with, it’s that his political ideology is “correct” and cohesive and that he makes sure to convey the entire thing in a 4 minute song.

    The people getting their knickers in twist over this song are lost.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      I don’t think that’s what this is about. I don’t have that kind of expectation of musicians. But if a musician chooses to sing about being a chud i think they should get dunked on

        • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sorry, I’m used to people familiar with our lingo. But, a guy who’s angry about “welfare queens” is a pretty good example. Fascists, conservatives, rascists, xenophobes, right-wingers, homophobes, frothingfash etc. are chuds. If any comrades have a better definition I’ll defer to that, but this is how I’d describe it off the top of my head

    • eatmyass [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Why don’t people want to listen to my racist song?”

      Also the song sucks

      • Takatakatakatakatak
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Number 1 on Apple Music US and Global top 100 charts, but yeah - your opinion is the correct one, it’s everyone else that is wrong.

        • eatmyass [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          40
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ah yes, the Apple Music top 100 charts, the objective decider of quality, how could I ever think to go against such a list

        • Infamousblt [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          So you admit that kpop is fantastic music then, since kpop is wildly internationally successful.

            • eatmyass [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              They’re dogwhistles. The parts about “the obese milkin welfare” and “taxes not ought to pay for your bags of fudge rounds.” Literally just Reagan era welfare queen rhetoric. If you don’t recognize those as racist dogwhistles you’ve been living under a rock for at least 40 years.

              But even if you don’t see the dogwhistles I hope you can understand how the song is punching down on poor people

                • UlyssesT [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  252 years ago

                  Unlike you, with dad’s boat dealership and the hard work you’ve done minding your manners and doing chores so you get the boat dealership someday! bootlicker

                • eatmyass [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  352 years ago

                  Hahahaha so then don’t act like you don’t understand how it’s racist. The racism is what you like about it!

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          382 years ago

          Exploitative gacha trash on phones are objectively the best made games in the world because they make the most money. galaxy-brain

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      It’s pretty funny

      This isn’t Reddit and saying “it’s funny” doesn’t hide your rage against people that weren’t born as comfortable as you were.

    • Loom In Essence
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      His political ideology is 100% the point of the song. It’s the only thing he’s singing about.

      You’re acting like he did an instrumental song and people ridiculed him for past behavior instead. No. He’s complaining that poor fat people eating government fudge is ruining his life lol. He’s a fucking moron.

  • young_broccoli
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Songs are not often literal. When he sings about the “obese” i think he means “the wealthy” and not literally fat people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      He literally says if you’re 5’3" and 300 lbs and eating fudge. Specifically referring to an obese person on welfare. Nothing hidden here.

    • Tony Smehrik
      link
      fedilink
      342 years ago

      Maybe, but he’s also using common talking points of conservatives who do literally believe fat people on SNAP benefits don’t deserve them.

    • ColorcodedResistor
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      i work with this guy…the type of guy to say “i got covid like a week before it got big, im the one who gave it to everyone at work, haha.”

      …yeah.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        I can’t tell you how many people walked into my store at the height of that shit and said, “Well, I got the wuflu. It ain’t nothin’. Just a dang cold.”

        Or, “shew buddy, China bug is about to wipe me out buddy. I ain’t never been so sick in my life. cough cough cough Whatchu wearing’ ‘at democrat rag for? You can still smell a fart cain’t yuh?”

  • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The best part is the line immediately before it. “We got hungry people on the streets” or something similar, right before complaining about food stamps.

    If giving the hungry poor and homeless people free food isn’t their solution to “we got hungry people on the streets” I wonder what is…

    Also there’s a weird as fuck line where he complains that we care too much about minors on islands (Epstein) and not enough about miners. Is that really the issue? Too much emphasis on billionaire pedophiles?

  • stigsbandit34z [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You’re telling me that in the year of our lord 2023, people believe that welfare alone is enough to cover housing, food, and clothing? This really ought to set anyone with a brain completely off. You know how much you get from the government on welfare? Not even 500 fucking dollars

    LMFAO how brainwashed can you possibly be?

    • Bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      242 years ago

      And unfortunately he’s also a pretty damn good singer.

      Like my hackles were up the whole time I was listening to the song because I knew this is some sort of like Republican redneck protest song against the liberals, but at the same time I had to admit the guy can fucking sing and it was a good song.

      We really need to step up our protest song game.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I love AJJ, they are a mainstay on my playlists. Their songs are good to great in the lyrics department. But musically they’re not super amazing. Their lead singer also has not a great singing voice. I don’t think any of their songs could be called “catchy” - and none of them are going to get the attention this guy’s song did, and a big part of that is their songs aren’t as good - again, simply from a music standpoint.

      • bmoney
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        You need to get out there and look.

        Lots of revolutionary music being made, just not made by industry plants and boosted by bullshit

        Tho he is a good singer, the song was basic

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        162 years ago

        Yeah that first verse about how we struggle, etc. I was very interested. Then look out for miners, not minors…oook easy dunk, we can all get behind protecting kids. Then the welfare thing. Oh it’s republican talking points not a new uprising of classic country like Cash

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        The song on youtube does seem to have recorded much greater pipes than he actually has live in person.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2242 years ago

    Fuck this bible thumpin reactionary hillbilly dork.

    “But he goes after both sides!”

    No, He punches down on poor people. Fuck off with that.

    • rebul
      link
      fedilink
      242 years ago

      How do you punch down on poor people when you are living in a camper? His song is #1 on iTunes in the US/UK/Australia, #2 in Ireland and Canada. But it certainly couldn’t be because it resonates truth for the masses. No, it is because he is punching down on the poor and you are so smart to have figured it out. The few negative opinions I have seen about this song have been from people it is calling out. Tool.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        962 years ago

        Having something resonate with a bunch of people, and saying something true isn’t always the same thing. You can say a bunch of dumb bullshit about society that resonates with people but isn’t really true, just like how he does. You have just fallen for the grift. Get his dick out of your mouth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          242 years ago

          Did you know that iTunes play counts are hidden and he has pitiful numbers on Spotify? He’s not popular. He’s being astroturfed by fascist propaganda channels. He’s the Sound of Freedom if it was a backwoods white supremacist hick.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Living in a camper…off the grid on 90 acres of land that he owns and plans to build a farmhouse and raise livestock on. Working class my ass…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          He bought it, yes, but technically the bank owns it yet. IIRC he says he owes $60K on it, and he’s paying it off. Very common practice.

          With this debt, and working a standard job, he doesn’t have the means to raise livestock atm. So yes, he’s planning to, someday.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            What does this even prove? If I take out a mortgage to buy a house, the bank “technically owns” my house. Does this make me not middle class?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Well, I don’t really care for the subtle, haughty undertones in your initial statements & acting like he’s some super well-off dude that has no problems. “off the grid on 90 acres that he owns”. He’s working on owning it, he wants to own land…and he’s going about it in a modest way.

              But oh my god , he’s planning to do stuff on that land. Eventually. He plans to build a farmhouse & raise livestock. The sheer audacity of these life goals. That he doesn’t have cash money for, but is working towards.

              Something tells me a house he builds is probably pretty different from a house you would build. It doesn’t have to be some crazy-ass expensive mansion.

              You then casually dismiss this man by saying “working class, my ass”. He’s gone through his past, IIRC a lot of warehouse/industrial work. He dropped out of high school, got his GED. I think that pretty much fits into the definition of working class. It does get a little more hairy when exploring what is middle class, because it does mention “owning land”. Okay. But there’s also emphasis on education & white collar professions…that’s not this guy at all.

              And maybe his dreams of owning land, building a home, and raising livestock are the main cause of his suffering. Life is exponentially harder for him because he is actively striving for life improvement, not living in a tiny box & watching Netflix on the couch.

              I think that’s the main source of his frustration that shines in his song, he’s working hard & then what little he makes is “taxed to no end”. The system makes it so hard for average, ordinary people to get ahead and actually do something of value with their lives.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Hahaha haughty? “The poor renter looking down on the middle class landowner.” Lol, what the fuck are you talking about.

                Tell me, have you ever lived in a rural area? Or been a farmworker? Because I really honestly can’t tell if I’m dealing with city folk who equate farmer who owns land with farmer who does farm work, or if I’m dealing with middle class folk who don’t understand the privilege of owning property, even if “the bank technically owns it.”

                Something tells me a house he builds is probably pretty different from a house you would build.

                Brave of you to assume I could even consider building a house anywhere, much less buying one.

                And yeah I really don’t give a shit about his past or education. Is Jay-z working class because he grew up in the Marcy projects? Is Richard Branson working class because he left school at 16?

                Life is exponentially harder for him because he is actively striving for life improvement, not living in a tiny box & watching Netflix on the couch.

                This tells me everything I need to know about you. “Average and ordinary” for you and “average and ordinary” for me mean completely different things. Have you ever talked to an actual poor person?

      • Raise_a_glass
        link
        fedilink
        682 years ago

        I’ve been thinking a lot about this song. And it is a real feeling that people have.

        But it is also just whining.

        The way he goes from talking about people without anything to eat and then talks about how someone that poor and fat shouldn’t eat a fudge round just seems to be a confused message.

        Is big government the problem? Or is it lack of corporate regulations that then allow big companies to pay people less than what they need to survive.

        Washington can do things to fix what he is talking about, but I would be shocked if he is interested in any policy that helps poor people or people drowning in student or medical debt.

          • Raise_a_glass
            link
            fedilink
            212 years ago

            What a great point. The regulations that are “acceptable “ are all about protecting the corporations.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              And so is the corporate music machine that markets this excuse for a protest song, it’s just another culture war debate masquerading as politics.

        • taigaman
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think he’s talking about people that have deliberately gotten themselves so fat that they get a disability check from the government for it. I definitely have a problem with where he’s placing the blame, but he’s talking about what he sees around him.

          I’m from an area similar to him, and the number of people trying to line themselves up for government assistance as their career is substantial. I think it speaks to the hopelessness of the area we live in these days, on top of generational poverty. Things have always been bad around here, but they got a lot worse after mining, and its supporting industries fell apart.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            212 years ago

            You said it yourself-- the reason those people need to make weird choices like trying to find any way to qualify for more government assistance is because historically their income came from industries that don’t and can’t exist anymore. They don’t have any other choice. The solution is actually more availability of assistance resources so people from those places can have enough stability to be able to make choices like learning new skills or moving to a new place. Why can’t people like him-- who see this happening to the people around him, his neighbors, his family-- empathize?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            172 years ago

            No one has “deliberately” gotten morbidly obese.

            I’m not absolving anyone of all personal responsibility for their body and what they put in it, but you should read about food deserts and similar. Many folks in this country ONLY have access to a McDonald’s and a gas station snack aisle.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            452 years ago

            I doubt there’s more than five people who have deliberately gotten themselves into disability by getting themselves fat. It’s incredibly hard to get onto disability and “I am fat” doesn’t cut it, you have to be able to not move to have even a chance

            • @[email protected]
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              332 years ago

              My mother is clinically diagnosed with a psychological disorder that caused hallucinations, anxiety and delusion. She tried to get disability for 30 years. She never got it even though she was institutionalized multiple times

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                232 years ago

                Yeah. My brother in law has severe physical and mental disabilities which makes him unable to work at all and he can’t get on. Been trying for a decade and a half. It’s like these people think you can send a letter to the government saying “I am fat and lazy” and you’ll get money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        342 years ago

        Aw yes because punching down never resonates with the masses. We’ve never elected politicians who distract from real issues by blaming poor people who don’t use them bootstraps…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        If you want the truth instead of the myth being pushed by the fascists who are astroturfing this guy all over social media, you can watch this video. It’s long, but there’s a ton of evidence in the first 10 minutes.

        https://youtu.be/3M6ZjYfp-B8

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        332 years ago

        How do you punch down on poor people when you are living in a camper?

        You can totally hate on poor people while being poor yourself. I’ve seen it loads of times. The mentality is “I deserve welfare, but those people don’t! They’re cheating the system!”

        The few negative opinions I have seen about this song have been from people it is calling out.

        Short, fat people?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        582 years ago

        Fat shaming, welfare queening, both sidsing, slack jawed backwater hick bullshit. I grew up around dipshits just like him. 1, they’re hypocrites that live off the system and haven’t been able to see their own cock without the assistance of a mirror in 15 years but because they’re white it’s ok. 2, Their “color blindness” and concern trolling falls away behind closed doors. It’s empty platitudes and surface level enlightened centrist garbage and nothing more. He doesn’t mean a word of what he’s singing and the people that “resonate” with it don’t either. It’s just 4 minutes of dog-whistling and right wing propaganda.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Their “color blindness” and concern trolling falls away behind closed doors. It’s empty platitudes and surface level enlightened centrist garbage and nothing more.

          Color blindness itself is basically a way to decouple yourself from the political economy you are a subject of, which is in no way “color blind” and has more or less created these system of classification. I don’t even subscribe to DiAngelo’s individualist notions of “white fragility,” I think they can even serve to reify the notion of race, but people saying they’re color blind is such a dismissal to address the world around you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        202 years ago

        Most of the lyrics are benign and he has plenty of musical talent. But the lyrics that comment on politics are just incredibly brain dead, I don’t know what else to tell you. It is proposing welfare recipients as the reason for poverty, but what percentage of tax returns go to welfare? Obviously like, nothing. Additionally his own region of the country has some of the highest rates of welfare recipiency and if that was cut off does he really think that would improve anything?

        I think the reason it leaves so many people with a bad taste in their mouths is because clearly a bait and switch is being performed. The first part draws your attention to the issues the singer is experiencing in his life such as low pay, then in the middle he goes on to talk about the “Rich men North of Richmond-” which if that is in reference to DC politicians then fair enough- in addition to welfare recipients as if those two things are related. He is just running defence for the wealthy by trying to distract people from the problems downstream from general extreme wealth inequality by trying to convince us fat people buying candy is causing everyone’s problems. Not to mention the humour there is in seeing someone that looks pretty severely overweight themselves calling out other fat people (much like how he is an apparent working class man going after over working class people.)

        In my opinion the purpose of the song is just to turn poor people against each other so we won’t get any ideas about taxing the rich or anything like that. This is probably be reason why lovely people like Matt Walsh were early promoters of the song.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Yeah, because a group of people have never rallied up for something they believed is true but isn’t…wait…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      532 years ago

      The name of the song itself is a huuuuuggggge dog whistle, imo. Tells me everything I need to know about the target demographic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        How is that? I’d honestly like to know. It raises my hackles, but i can’t really explain why.

        “Rich men north of Richmond”… I’m not american, so maybe that’s why i don’t quite get it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          202 years ago

          Probably has something to do with the Mason Dixon line (civil war border) and Richmond being the northernmost city of the South.

          • matchphoenix
            link
            fedilink
            18
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Richmond was the former capital of the confederacy. The Mason-Dixon line is actually at the Pennsylvania-Maryland/Delaware border.

            North of Richmond is referencing Washington DC which has a large, fairly poor Black population and its suburbs, which are very rich and somewhat liberal.

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              fedilink
              English
              162 years ago

              I think its a bit of a stretch that he’s not just talking about Congress/Senate when referring to rich people in DC. That seems to be the most likely scenario.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                102 years ago

                Standard rightwingery refers to “them politicians in Washington”. When he tosses in a reference to the capitol of the Confederacy, it’s pretty clear who he’s pandering to.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  I think you’re probably right due to the target audience of the song and who originally seeded its success, e.g. Matt Walsh. Although I suppose you can just argue that Richmond just sounds good put next to rich men? Though if they weren’t comfortable with it being associated with the confederacy though they just wouldn’t have used it.

                  If I was to disregard the confederacy association I would say it’s an OK name because if you’re referring to politicians in DC they’re a group that’s worthy of being called out. It would still be stupid though because of course many of their favourite politicians are, you know, politicians and also very rich (like Donald Trump but also many more who were born into great wealth and continued to be wealthy throughout their lives.)

        • Takatakatakatakatak
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          Pretty sure Washington DC is directly North of Richmond. I’m not from USA but that was my natural assumption about who he was talking about just based on geography and the US centre of power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          162 years ago

          Kinda weird when your song talking shit about politicians contains an explicit reference to the folks you’re talking about being north of the capital of the Confederacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        Dude is a full blown nazi, his YouTube channel had (possibly still has) a playlist of videos titled something like “videos to make ya think”, including stuff about the dancing Israelis conspiracy theory.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Anybody who uses that phrase is just so unaware of how they sound. To accuse everybody else of not thinking is just so arrogant. Oh look at me, I’m the one who figured it out, all I had to do was start thinking. No one else is thinking