• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    I’m surprised Sweden is going this route at all, considering they’ve touted being a privacy respecting country in the past. I suppose that gets enshitified at some point, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Well, we have a shitty police force that tries to do as little as possible. Easier to fuck shit up for regular people than actually bothering the criminals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    462 months ago

    She talks a good game now, let’s hope she sticks with that stance after the bill is introduced.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      I don’t believe a bill will be introduced.

      The Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) have decided to standardize the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal for non-classified communications via mobile phones.

      The Swedish military would likely have to reevaluate their use.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 months ago

        Frankly the military should re-evaluate.

        As good as Signal is for the average non-technical person, organizations with resources would be far better served by hosting their own, using something like XMPP with encryption, with servers only permitting connection from their own compiled clients, run in a container on the phone, which have been available since at least 2010.

        No business I’ve worked for would accept Signal as a solution, in part because you have little control over it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          It’s only for non classified information. Sweden has other encryption schemes for communication.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Still, they don’t control it. Which means support is a real problem.

            They’re not even paying for a service, which would give you contractual commitments.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Wire (https://wire.com/) uses the same OTR / double-ratchet encryption primitives as Signal, but focuses more on self-hosting, and supporting organizations that want to self-host (for whatever reason).

          I believe GNU Jami, well-deployed is capable of Signal’s level of security while being self-hosted.

        • randombullet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          I mean signal is used for non-secret non-sensitive communications.

          It’s like hey we have a formation here at this time.

          Hey we have inventories here.

          It’s good enough for basic stuff. No one will be using signal for anything higher than unclassified.

          Also phones are often not issued to soldiers so I doubt most are going to install a military related/developed app onto it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        SAF is really not happy about this. Most people in the military used and recommend Signal for most communication (both personal and non-confidential) until they standardized it, and most people I have contacted facepalmed at the proposal. Hopefully, the dipshit that got this stupid fucking idea (pardon my french) will meet the same storm of critisim as Ylva Johansson got.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Nato and some Swedish agencies already use Matrix, Försvarsmakten should help standardize.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 months ago

      Signal is maintained by a nonprofit foundation in California. They don’t have shareholders or profits to worry about, unlike Apple, Google, Meta, and the rest.

      After all they’ve done to ensure their users’ privacy, I would be genuinely shocked if they capitulate to just this one country.

      • 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        After all they’ve done to ensure their users’ privacy, I would be genuinely shocked if they capitulate to just this one country.

        Of course they won’t.

        The problem happens when other countries start following the precedent and too many of them make the same ask. There are parallel processes in the UK, and at the EU level.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 months ago

          Oh, definitely. That’s a danger even for decentralized social media, because once a legal precedent is set, going after smaller operators could become easier (especially if global leaders all decide to try).

          My claim isn’t that it’s bulletproof, just that I don’t expect them to fold over a desire to keep their market share. That’s the beginning and end of it.

          Everyone should always remain vigilant, especially since privacy isn’t a guarantee even among previously privacy-forward countries, anymore.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          You’re not wrong. Hopefully that never becomes a problem, but it’s why nobody should ever take privacy for granted.