Seriously, where are 99% of the life begins at conception people on the meat industry?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      I don’t understand your stance. Being vegan is more ethical, but eating meat is necessary? Surely if meat is necessary then an omnivorous diet is most ethical?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        the song is meant to be what the conception people think, but…

        it is necessary for certain people, and it’s easier to achieve certain things by eating meat/animal products. I am an omnivore, but I understand that veganism is more ideal, I just don’t have the capability of achieving it (I can’t even eat properly on an omnivore diet).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    But that’s different!

    Honestly though, is “but it’s different” a proper informal fallacy?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      274 months ago

      And yet many can be up in arms about dogs & cats being eaten in some regions despite that claim

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        This is a great counterpoint, ill have to remember it next time I’m having a discussion about the subject.

      • riwo
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        dogs go to dog heaven, duh
        of they got souls! /s

      • Amon
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        I don’t care what species it is

        I have three requirements for meat:

        • It isn’t human flesh
        • It isn’t rotten
        • It’s cooked properly
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      164 months ago

      Apparently that soul doesn’t matter when trying to prevent it from dying from preventable diseases with vaccines and nurturing it with affordable education.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        Don’t you know it’s much more preferable for your child to die of a preventable illness than for them to get autism from vaccines which is totally a thing that happens?

        /s of course

        • Nat (she/they)
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          When I infodump for 2 hours straight I can see why they would prefer if I died /s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          It’s even worse. One of the contributing factors for autism is fine dust particles in pollution from fossil fuels. And the ones against vaccines are often also the ones for fossil fuels.

  • ALQ
    link
    fedilink
    974 months ago

    If you’re really being serious, then the answer is that most (or, at least, the vocal majority) of those people don’t even really care about living children. I don’t see that type of person generally giving any more care to a non-human being than they would a human being, and they already don’t care about people other than themselves.

    “Pro-life” has always been a misnomer. More honest descriptions would be “anti-choice” or “pro-forced birth.”

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      Serious in that they should stand up for non-human animals, but in the kind of way where you also know the answer as to why 99% aren’t

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Well, most christians here would not agree with americans on many issues, christianity is not the problem.

          • Da Bald Eagul
            link
            fedilink
            194 months ago

            I haven’t seen Christianity mentioned in the post, or the comment you’re replying to… And neither have been edited.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              Yeah, in my defense, my head hurts like shit and I can barely think.

              Christians are usually the ones against abortions, and it seemed to me the people the original comment was talking about were conservative christians, but I see how my comment is not entirely relevant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      164 months ago

      It’s anti-woman.

      The real true reason most people are against abortion isn’t because they don’t believe it’s a necessity. It’s because they are afraid that some woman won’t be punished for having sex. Whether or not the fetus survives isn’t the point, it’s that someone has to be punished for enjoying life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Yes, exactly. The complexity of the human soul is uncomparable to the basic impulses of any animal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Embryos don’t have souls. The soul develops during the third trimester.

        If you can play music into your belly and get a kick, that thing has a soul. But there’s a lot of time where it’s not that developed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Poor choice of words on my part, perhaps. Maybe, if I chose "mind, instead of the more poetic word “soul” people would not reply about how an embryo is not ensouled.

          But please tell me, was your original comment about racism towards animals sarcastic? It is sometimes hard to tell, and it seems almost like a position someone would hold.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            I’m genuinely a vegan because I think racism is wrong.

            Single cells don’t have a mind either. Minds are made of neurons. An embryo begins developing neural cells during the fifth week of development. That’s just a few neurons, though, not a full brain. A fetus doesn’t get smart enough to process sounds until the late second. If a mind isn’t even complex enough to process any sensory information, is it more deserving of life than a cow? Cows like to run in the grass and play. They have social relationships. Fetuses aren’t that complex.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              Obviously I am not talking about fetuses. I responded to the racism comment and the inner lives of people are generally not that complicated when tbey are in the womb. I am just using this as a reason to value humans over animals.

              Also, minds are not made out of neurons, brains are.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                If one human’s inner life were more complex than another’s, would you value their life more?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  No, I wouldn’t.

                  While humans and animals have inner worlds that are orders of magnitude apart in terms of complexity, I would say that most people feel more or less the same emotions, but of course some people are more self-actualised, but everyone has the potential for that, even if it is not realised.

                  And it is impossible to compare this complexity in practice, of course, as there are no criteria for measuring that. Also, every human is unique in a sense and is valuable precisely because of that.

                  Ultimately, our values are impossible to defend. We can either share them or not, I do not care much about the animals, you do, this is fine by me.