• @Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    494 months ago

    The incompetence is palpable. They would be far more nefarious if they weren’t tripping over their own balls all the time.

    I hope these people renegotiate a good contract.

    • @Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      They would be far more nefarious if they weren’t tripping over their own balls all the time.

      Fear not! These foibles will all be iterated away during Trump’s third term. Practice makes perfect!

  • AmidFuror
    link
    fedilink
    694 months ago

    It’s almost like they rushed the decision and are incompetent.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis
    link
    fedilink
    114 months ago

    Were these more of the people getting the letters saying they are being terminated for performance issues, despite glowing performance reviews? Who wants to go back after that, knowing it can happen again with zero predictability?

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 months ago

    How many times does the US administration have to repeat it for it to stop being an accident.

    They’ve done this with the national nuclear stockpile also: fire nearly everyone and try to figure out who they need based on what they broke.

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    fedilink
    English
    154 months ago

    Can you imagine how much baying and howling with rage Fox News and all the other right-wing outlets would be doing if this happened on a Democrat president’s watch? And the subsequent screaming many GOP voters would be doing?

    It’s not hard to imagine, because they routinely freaked out about stuff much more trivial than this. (Remember Obama’s white suit?)

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    How do you accidentally sack someone?

    You have to specifically choose a person, presumably with an actual reason for sacking them, then reach out to them specifically to inform them of their sacking.

    In my country you also require a valid reason for doing so, you can’t just randomly sack someone, I imagine in this case it would be being made redundant.

    So, you decide your staff are no longer required and if their contract allows you to let them go (or you just pay the big severance or whatever), okay cool.

    Then you… change your mind? What?

    That’d be a deeply incompetent employer. Like, buffoon levels. I wouldn’t go back to working for someone like that. If nothing else, they’ve shown how little they care about their staff. Not worth it.

    • gonzo-rand19
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      In my country you also require a valid reason for doing so, you can’t just randomly sack someone

      In the US you can be fired at any time for any reason (or no reason), including “I’m having a bad day and I don’t like you.” Randomly sacking people is Trump’s thing, he had a show about it and everything.

      • @straightjorkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        The federal government actually does have protections for people who are not in the probationary period, which is why they only fired people in the probationary period, because if they tried to fire tenured employees they’d have a much bigger fight. But that probationary period can last from 1 to 2 years, and also kicks in again for anyone who starts in a new position.

    • @toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Likely the kind of people working for the government on things like bird flu are, at least in part, doing it for the greater good, rather than exclusively personal benefit (i.e. pay, status or even stability). That kind of person might be more willing to work for a perceived bad employer than you or I, since that employer - for the time being, anyway - is likely to have more reach (for information or material dispensation) than most any other entity.

      edit: Also, even if they are motivated purely by personal benefit, this seems like it would put them in a pretty strong negotiating position. They could use the situation to get themselves a cushy contract while finding something more reliable.

    • @ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 months ago

      The morons fired every federal employee who was classified as “probationary”, in multiple departments. This is all employees with less than 90 days in their current role, but because these idiots don’t know anything about anything, they assumed it meant new hires only.

      Others have pointed out that the US largely practices “at will” employment (IIRC, only one state doesn’t), and that’s true, but government workers do tend to have stronger protections than private sector workers. But probationary status is a whole other can of worms.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not just Elon. It’s the hedge fund playbook. Aquire a company, strip it for parts, collect profit, move on to the next business.

        The Federal government is being liquidated as a going concern. Elon is leading the charge because he’s the most successful in his field.

  • @Teal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    They weren’t accidentally fired. That asshole with no brains who calls himself a president made yet another dumb choice.

  • @Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Probably good idea to eat a bunch of chicken the next few months. It will be more expensive than caviar soon

  • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    I remember when the China, France, a Latin American consortium… even Cuban released their versions of the COVID vaccine, and US officials fell all over one another insisting they didn’t work.

    I wonder how the US will respond if we lack any kind of for-profit answer to another pandemic. Will our demolition of the FDA mean we can acquire medication abroad? Or will the US crack down on vaccine tourism out of paranoia?

    Seems like the US might abandon even the pretense of being a global pharmaceutical leader in the rush to return to its quack roots.

  • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    This is going to be bad.

    I’m in some homesteading/backyard chicken groups, and they are already gearing up some disturbing conspiracy narratives. “Bird flu” isn’t real, and it’s a ploy by the globalists to kill off poultry to force us to EAT ZE BUGS and fake meat. There will be people who will be ready to revolt against any action taken to prevent or control the outbreak.

    The same types are also pushing raw milk.

    We are going to have another pandemic, with an administration that is actively hostile to public health and already has a track record of exacerbating this previous one - responsible for the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans. This is intentional as part of the accelerationist project to break down the US into micro fiefdoms.

    • Caveman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      If you think that’s bad you don’t want to know what they put inside the fake meat. Let’s just say that it’s not a coincidence that there are now more genders. /s