I’m not well versed in C&C, but it’s always good to see more games open sourced.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    384 months ago

    Holy shit, EA did something… Good? I did not have that on my 2025 bingo card. So, what’s the catch? There has to be a catch, right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Short version: You can make free stuff for them but they still own all of it and still require people to purchase a copy to use the derivatives.

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      254 months ago

      This doesn’t release any copyright work in the game. So you will need to go through and remove any sprites, images, audio, etc that is copyright. Which means you will need to own a copy of the game (to have a right to the copyright usage) to use any binary produced from THIS source.

      Additionally, it indicates that you must include in any derivative that the source of your code is from the EA drop here.

      Outside of that, it is GPLv3. Of course it has hard dependency on DirectX 5.0. So a fully free version will need to redo those parts. Also the code is very MS VC++ heavy. Don’t expect gcc to build you a binary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Heh, the red alert readme says it currently requires borland for the asm and watcom compiler for the c/c++.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          I think so. When I first saw the announcement, I was fearing some barely open source license, and was pleasantly surprised.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    dont people already make seperate MODS for each anyways, for them anyways,. they figured they wernt making money off having the old games in thier wierd little launcher.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 months ago

    Abusers will often buy gifts to placate the victim. It’s a cheap and empty move that changes nothing in the end. Do not be fooled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      134 months ago

      EA doesn’t open source old games: EA are scum and anti-consumer.

      EA open sources old games: EA are scum and anti-consumer.

      If it’s good it must be bad, right?

    • Owl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      I am under the impression that lemmy is more negative than reddit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        People are people; I feel we’ve generally got quite a good vibe going on so don’t let the grumps bring you down!

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      644 months ago

      Are you okay? They open sourced some classic video games. They didn’t roofie your drink.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        Go ahead and fall for their PR campaign. You wouldn’t be the first and you won’t be the last.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          534 months ago

          Fall for what? They did one of the most pro-consumer moves they possibly could. It’s legally solid and irrevocable. It doesn’t mean I have to give a shit about their next live service game or be happy that they monetize soccer video games with gambling for children.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Putting in an awful lot of effort defending EA already for someone that doesn’t give a shit

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              274 months ago

              I don’t have to give a shit “about their next live service game”

              I care quite a lot about game preservation. This isn’t defending EA; it’s praising this particular action. Again, this can’t be taken away from us, so it doesn’t matter what their next shitty behavior is. It doesn’t take away from this being good news.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Exactly, I really don’t get the all or nothing thinking where you can’t even acknowledge something unambiguously positive because of who is doing it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              214 months ago

              They never said they don’t give a shit, they’re clearly happy that the broken clock was right this time of day. Nobody is praising EA as a company, but this one particular action they have taken is pretty based

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94 months ago

    If I had to guess, I’d say it’s some write-off move. A bit like Epic Games released all Paragon assets after they canceled the game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 months ago

      As I understand accounting, you really don’t need to do stuff like this to write off your assets.

      I’m not saying there isn’t a cynical corporate reason for doing this but I doubt this is it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      Epic released those to add value to their engine not as a write off

      EA released this to boost Steam Workshop content - which would boost sales - not as a write off

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That game seemed so underappreciated. I would be thrilled if I could have another LAN party with it.

  • Go-On-A-Steam-Train
    link
    fedilink
    English
    694 months ago

    This is brilliant! :) aw, I hope it benefits the OpenRA developers and means more fun things to play eventually :)

    Wait… this is EA… are they okay? This is very unlike them

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        194 months ago

        I think the old Westwood dev they put in charge of the franchise just doesn’t have any oversight.

        • turtle [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          184 months ago

          That would be a completely legendary move if the dev hired by EA just said “fuck it, I’m open-sourcing this shit!”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            164 months ago

            It sounds like that’s what happened, but through the proper channels. They hired a known CnC community/modding site admin as the dev.

            I’d imagine he pitched that this was an easy way to reduce maintenance costs while fostering massive good will and making the amount of long tail sales over time higher.

            • turtle [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              That’s actually kind of a brilliant concept that should serve as an example for other video game publishers then: open-source the program so that it can be maintained by the community, but require a license to use the artwork. The community could eventually recreate and even improve the artwork anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    164 months ago

    Fuck EA but cool move - if they keep being not shit for long enough I might consider their products again.

    Doubt they can keep it up.

  • unalivejoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They’re still requiring EA Play or $6 for the bundle on steam.

  • ZeroOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 months ago

    Now if only they open-sourced the SAGE engine, then we’d be all happy

    The engine is highly optimized & produces great visuals, Of course there IS OpenSAGE