• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Reportedly? It’s been dead since (in case of Linux) version 84.3 (just to hint at its age, it’s in Qt 4 and supports ALSA) stopped logging in.

    Exchanging files via Skype was very easy. Roleplaying in groupchats.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1252 months ago

    They are not killing Skype, they just now bury the corpse. Skype died by malnutrion and bad parenting by MS a decade ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 months ago

      Well, they’re doing what they already have been and absorbing it into teams. Teams video chat is littered with the bits of leftover Skype tech references, they’re just making sure it’s an enterprise product they can bill monthly for instead of a free consumer product

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        I find 365 to be a terrible mess if applications, outlook and teams have a calendar separate to the calendar app. Teams sucks

  • veee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    Thank goodness! My parents refuse to move the group chat to anything else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      One of my clients is a small company that has been running with seven staff working from home, scattered around the globe, mostly rural. Since 1999. Everything has been held together by skype: chat, video, audio.

      Should be interesting finding the right new workflow!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    It’s amazing how they fumbled this. There was a time when video calls were Skype. Everybody was using Skype, everybody had it installed, people used it to chat and then … something happened. Microsoft did nothing. Or did the wrong kind of stuff. Software started to suck. And when the pandemic came, Zoom took over and nobody even tried to use Skype. That really, really are some bad business decisions there

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      It didn’t “start to suck”, they intentionally transitioned it, from old lean clients working over p2p usable in unbelievably bad connectivity conditions, to something server-based and fat laggy clients with typical Microsoft quality. They they turned off authentication servers for the old Skype.

      If the old Skype were still functional today, nobody would say it sucks. OK, maybe no stickers and such.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        i realize i haven’t been able to send files for years now because all the p2p platforms have disappeared.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          The way internet got developed does make you wonder if it could have been done better if it weren’t for grifter class always engineering shit to middle man.

          Here is some free cloud boy, enjoy, trust me, I will never sell your data and start charging fees while degrading quality of this great thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          https://lemmy.world/comment/15367515 - yes ; so I think the idea of an IM that could replace it with the functionality normal for it belongs not to the tech realm (all parts solved separately), but to social studies and market studies realm. Somehow there is a technology that has defeated all competition thrown at it, it’s called bittorrent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 months ago

    Another company Microsoft bought and ran into the ground. It’s really incredible that they managed to get their lunch stolen. They had basically a monopoly and gave it away without a fight. Hell, the colloquialism for video calling someone was to Skype them for a looong time.

    And then one small competitor comes along and it’s all gone. How can you fuck up this bad? Especially during the pandemic, in which they should have further entrenched their monopoly…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      They intentionally killed it, when it wasn’t theirs, it was a nuisance, when it was theirs, it wasn’t a nuisance, but also not too useful.

      It’s about control, I think.

      I mean, without Skype going bad would all these <censored> IMs, especially Telegram, become so popular?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Yes, which makes me wonder on the old question if it’s possible to create a distributed IM as prolific as bittorrent protocol.

          In that last example they did something right. At some point I liked ed2k+kad and would swear at bittorrent for not incorporating search, reputation and such as basic components, but maybe that’s what made torrents survive when other filesharing tools went out of common knowledge.

          I’m going to think on this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      Around these parts in the 2000s, MSN Messenger was what literally everyone used. Then Microsoft bought Skype and decided to shut down MSN Messenger. Then they also ruined Skype. Microsoft just can’t do anything right despite making so much money. It’s like they have no long term vision.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 months ago

      Was Skype really relevant when the pandemic hit? Nobody I knew used it anymore. And teams had mostly taken over for Skype for business by then as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        Skype for business is Skype in name only. It’s basically Office communicator with several name changes

      • PhobosAnomaly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My org used Skype For Business and it worked remarkably well. Much more lightweight, though somehow still a little less responsive than it should have been.

        It has that “it just works” factor for video calling, whereas Teams almost needs a fucking checklist to rattle through if someone’s audio or video feed isn’t working.

          • PhobosAnomaly
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Yeah I’ve still got my headsets from boxes with Skype For Business branding that have “Compatible with Microsoft Lync” stickers on them.

            It’s probably closer in UI to Skype from the 2000s that the “real” Skype never really recaptured. Not sure if that’s a good or a bad thing.