• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    The democrats and thier party have been bought and paid for. They aren’t going to save us from the billionaires.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    I’ll keep saying this: it’s precious that people still believe The Constitution has any sway and that we are a country of laws. That ship has sailed over the horizon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      I agree, Republicans and Democrats keep taking turns swinging their axe at the tree every four to eight years. The tree hasn’t fallen over yet, but it was dead a long time ago.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    I think the democrats are applying the age old adage: “Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.”

    Or they could be in the minority in both house, senate, SCOTUS, and white house and they can’t do shit besides filibuster and sue.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      What democrats really do is “never interrupt your enemy ever because decorum”, though this adage would be assuming they actually consider republicans as enemies. They’ll point and scream about trump and then promote other republicans like dick cheney who largely have the same policies as trump but who act according to decorum better.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    94 months ago

    Nope, sorry, I just saw a politico article about Newsom agreeing with Charlie Kirk on trans people in sports that basically boiled down to “FINALLY! SOMEONE understands that this is the most critical topic in America today, and for Democrats to win, they need to become republicans!”

    The democrats aren’t leading us anywhere. They’re not going to save us. They have no vision besides being dollar store republicans and wondering why Republican voters keep choosing Republicans over them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      There is a reason the main Democratic leadership is not pushing a more left leaning agenda, they would lose. If the left got a foothold on the national conversation like maga did then the middle of the road Democrats fear they will go the way of the middle of the road Republicans and that is out of power.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        There is a reason the main Democratic leadership is not pushing a more left leaning agenda, they would lose.

        Well, they just lost by moving right.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          Yes they did but they didn’t lose control of their narrative which is weak and feckless.

          “give me more money and keep me in power and I promise to not do much.” and “don’t look left, they are crazy!”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            Yes they did but they didn’t lose control of their narrative which is weak and feckless.

            Weak and feckless is their brand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      They have no vision besides being dollar store republicans and wondering why Republican voters keep choosing Republicans over them.

      While screaming at anyone to their left for not being enthusiastic to vote for dollar store republicans.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The fact that Democrats should be raising their voices as loudly as possible against this admin’s moves but instead a sizable 10 of them voted to censure the 1 Democrat who tried to in fact do that, tells you everything about the Democrats’ plans.

    At this point, there are only a handful of them who are rallying their constituents and speaking out about this admin’s atrocities, but the majority is completely MIA. Then they wonder why their voters are MIA during the elections.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      10 in the house, out of 215 or 214 depending on the exact time of death of Sylvester Turner, not really sizable imo. Also, since there were 0 Republican Nays, it would have passed regardless.

      Give those 10 a piece of your mind, yes, but it’s not sizable or impactful at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          The point you seem to be missing is that you’re using the actions of ten to condemn the whole party, which isn’t reasonable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            I don’t accept excuses. It should have been zero. democrats expect unthinking lockstep from their voters no matter what they do, so I expect them to vote with the party.

            All of them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    104 months ago

    Liberalism isn’t going to save us. Way I see it, if we want a better country, we have three options:

    1. Violent revolution. This should be a last resort, and I don’t think we are quite there yet.

    2. Wait for Fascism to collapse. It will. Problem is, A FUCKING LOT of people will suffer and die in the mean time.

    3. Mobilize a viable third party. No, not the Greens. They are just as corrupt as the rest, and they pal around with Fascist traitors. I’m talking about a real grass roots Leftist movement, starting from the ground up. Basically, use the exact same playbook that MAGA used. They spent the past decade taking over social media with their Manosphere bullshit, and suddenly Gen Z shifted hard to the Right, which younger generations almost never do. We need to take back that online space. Take over town hall meetings, take over school boards, take over city councils, show up in huge numbers to vote for actual good (or as good as we can get) judges and DA’s. This also means volunteering, phone banking, door knocking, and most importantly of all, some of you need to run for office. Even something local can make a difference in your community. That’s how MAGA won. They didn’t even have the numbers. They just had the right strategy, and in their hubris, Democrats ignored it.

    The third option is obviously what I prefer to happen. It’ll take a few years, and we may not even win the White House in 2028. But this isn’t about you or me. It’s about the future of civilization. If they did it, so can we. Let’s not be outsmarted by a bunch of people who worship a man who can’t fucking read.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Honestly I’m attempting option 3 any way I can currently. I keep telling my partner if I lose my job I oughta become one of those youtube/twitch talking heads but for actual leftist views and maybe I can help the shift back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      Not saying it can’t be done, obviously it can but to many people saying “run for office” is like saying “build a car”.

      Are there primers on how to start with a campaign for people that have the desire but not the knowledge?

      What is all involved in starting and running a successful campaign?

      How much time do you need to dedicate to the campaign?

      What would be the personal cost for running for office?

      Who do you need to hire to help you (manager, donation specialist, volunteer coordinator, etc)?

      My guess to this is that the higher the office the more people and money you will need.

      I’m not writing this to be contrary but to really get answers - I think more people would be more open to the idea if they could see what a campaign needs to be successful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Definitely good questions. I couldn’t find any “Beginners Guide to Running for Office”, so I sat up for a while chugging coffee and reading a whole bunch of local election board websites and other related sources, and this is what I came up with. This is by no means a comprehensive list or plan, but I tried to break down the main components of running for a local office in the most general terms possible, so it could be applied more broadly.

        Preparation

        • Figure out which office you want to run for, where you think you can make the most difference with your skill-set in your community.
        • Research the responsibilities of the office you’re seeking. Attend school board or city council (or whatever) meetings to see how they operate. Take lots of notes or record it if allowed.
        • Identify key issues in your community, your potential opponents, and the demographics of your district.
        • Clearly articulate why you’re running and what you hope to achieve. This will be the foundation of your campaign.
        • Check your local election board for eligibility requirements like residency, age, filing deadlines, and paperwork.

        Campaign Team

        • Campaign Manager: Appoint someone to oversee operations. Preferably someone with some political savvy and/or managerial experience.
        • Treasurer: Appoint someone to manage finances and ensure compliance with campaign finance laws.
        • Volunteers: Recruit a team of dedicated volunteers for canvassing, phone banking, and event support. The number of volunteers will vary, depending on the size of your campaign, but there’s no such thing as too many.
        • Advisors: Network with local community leaders and activists who share your vision, and listen to them. They have their ears to the ground, and can offer critical advice on what your community needs.

        Campaign Strategy

        • Set a budget and determine how much money you’ll need for materials, advertising, and events. Focus on grassroots fundraising. This seems to be the most difficult part with no clear answer, so look into the campaign financing of previous candidates running for the same office to get an idea of how much it’ll likely cost.
        • Develop a clear, concise message that resonates with voters.
        • Identify your base and tailor your outreach to their concerns.
        • Map out key milestones like filing deadlines, debates, voter registration deadlines, and Election Day. Set realistic goals to accomplish by those dates.

        Build Your Brand

        • Create a professional logo and a memorable slogan that reflects your values. Say what you want about Trump, but “Make America Great Again” and “MAGA” are a great slogan/logo combo. It’s simple, clear, and easy to remember.
        • Build a simple website with your bio, platform, and contact info. Use social media to engage voters and share updates.
        • Print flyers, yard signs, and business cards to distribute in the community.

        Community Engagement

        • Knock on doors to introduce yourself and listen to voters concerns.
        • Show up at community gatherings, fairs, and town halls to build visibility.
        • Organize meet-and-greets, town halls, or fundraisers to connect with voters.
        • Seek support from local leaders, organizations, and activists to boost your credibility and visibility.
        • Volunteer at homeless shelters, food banks, and other places. Even just a day here and there can make all the difference. Engage with employees, customers, and residents about your campaign. Listen to their concerns, and offer viable solutions.

        Fundraising

        • Focus on grassroots fundraising by asking friends, family, and community members for small contributions.
        • Set up a donation portal on your website and promote it on social media.
        • Keep detailed records of all donations and expenses to comply with campaign finance laws.

        Messaging

        • Send press releases to local newspapers, radio stations, and TV stations to announce your candidacy and major events.
        • Participate in candidate debates and forums to showcase your platform.
        • Post regularly about your platform, events, and endorsements. Engage with people in the comments.
        • Send postcards or letters to targeted voters highlighting your key issues.

        Get People to Vote

        • Help eligible voters register before the deadline.
        • Encourage supporters to vote early or by mail if available.
        • Organize volunteers to remind voters to cast their ballots and offer rides to the polls if needed.

        Again, this is by no means a comprehensive, foolproof plan. I didn’t include many resources, because requirements, deadlines, and paperwork all vary by state and county. These just seemed to be the most common points I picked up from a number of sources, and should at least give you an idea of how and what to research further.

        Personally, I have no ambition to run for office because I’m already 50 and don’t want to add to the pool of geriatrics running this country. We need to hand the torch to young people. That said, I will help any way I can if someone younger wants to run. Speech writing, phone banking, logo design, or pretty much anything else, I will gladly offer my services for free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        I’m specifically barred from holding any public office, political or not until I exit the military. I have about a year left before I can launch any kind of campaign legally. Assuming we survive that long, I plan to. That all said I have no idea what I’m doing and would love to have the answers to the questions you pose here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      The 3rd option is still playing with liberal electoralism which got you here in the first place. you could get results faster with mutual aid and strong unions, this is how you guys got worker rights before, in the times of FDR.

      A better presence in social media is a good direction though, especially in federated communities that don’t need to fear corporate censorship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Liberal electoralism isn’t going anywhere any time soon, unfortunately. We still have to operate within that system if we want to affect any change for the better at the political level. Things like mutual aid and strengthening unions can and should happen right alongside it, just as they did before. But that’s a good addition, and I should have mentioned it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    74 months ago

    Blaming Democrats for… Not being shit compared to Republicans and MAGA? This is some next level stupidity. The fact is, propaganda is everywhere and most Americans are stupid. It’s the perfect combination. GTFO of here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      We can absolutely blame Democrats. They were the incumbent party, typically an enormous advantage, and squandered it. The lesser of two evils wasn’t lesser enough. They didn’t even run primaries when they dropped their incumbent president, so I can’t even pretend the shame is on me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Stop pretending there are rules. They didn’t do this thing or the other and lost because of it. No, they lost because the rules no longer apply and, again, Americans are stupid. Stupid people soak up Fox news lies without a second thought, and that’s all it takes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      Bingo. They’re victim blaming to be divisive. The real problem has nothing to do with Democrats.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    44 months ago

    At this point a total collapse of the USA’s 2-party-system seems the best of all realistic alternatives.

    Because the Dems getting their shit together in less than 4 years certainly isn’t realistic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      We don’t have a two party system. Jesus fucking Christ. Anyone who thinks this doesn’t understand the system well enough to be making suggestions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        You’re totally right. We don’t have a two party system, we have a system where only two parties are large enough to win any kind of influence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      The two party system can’t collapse without taking the whole government down with it. It’s baked into the constitution. Not in words as such, but in mathematical reality. I just want to be real about “realistic outcomes.” Fix the parties or rewrite the whole fucking shebang.

      And that second option—there is a lot unsaid there about how that comes about, but it’s not by everyone embracing universal brotherhood and sisterhood and mutually agreeing on a better way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        The two party system can collapse. It has several times before. What needs to happen is for the Democratic Party to go the way of the Whigs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          With the Whigs, there was a total realignment of politics based on the single issue of slavery, which led to immediate civil war. That doesn’t seem like it really contradicts my point.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The US government is like a beat up old car we try to keep on the road with Lucasoil and duct tape. We’ve needed to fix it a long time ago but we didn’t.

        The car will eventually stop working and leave us stranded if we do nothing, but we also can’t afford to leave it at the mechanic for a week because we need to get to work in the morning.

        The government will fall, people will be hurt by it, and we will have to make something new - note I didn’t say better - and it will happen at the least opportune time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Couldn’t agree more. Especially that last part. New doesn’t mean better. We can hope.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            I understand people being frustrated. Who isn’t. But these people lash out like children are just as bad as the people who caused this. It’s like our collective getaway car is a rusty Ford Pinto and they’re like “fuck that thing, burn it down!”

            My man, that was our getaway car from fascism. Was that your intention?

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            If the new government is anything like new cars then every basic function will be behind a laggy touch screen and the government will track our every movement and sell it to insurance companies.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              How much of the new government will end up being subscription-based?

              EDIT: spelling correction

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          Ok, but now imagine the car was built by slavers to violent protect their disgusting privilege. Is it still worth “fixing”?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Unfortunately, the two party system right now can probably only collapse into a one party system.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    The Dems fielded a candidate with potential, in a binary race against the absolute worst candidate ever.

    Voters chose a felon with a pattern of grifting and lies.

    Those are facts.

    Here’s the opinion: stop blaming the party for the people’s mistake. Just secede and be done with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Uh, you missed a few steps. Like the people voicing concerns over Biden’s mental health and being told to shove it while the party hid him from public view as much as possible. And then when they couldn’t hide it anymore they still tried to gaslight us that we didn’t see what we just saw.

      And then finally they succumbed to that public pressure when it was far too late to have an actual primary and rally as a party, instead being told to vote for someone who was candidate-by-default.

      The Dems constantly try to pander to the right which only fuels their real enemy in elections: voter apathy. If they actually governed and gave more than lip service, they’d never lose another election.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Biden could have gone comatose at the stand and I’d still support him with every fiber of my being. Voters fucked up. The left is splintered into pointless divisions and petty ideals. Take the L.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          Good for you, but still wrong. The party fucked up. It’s their job to win elections, and they had loads of opportunities over the last 10 years to act differently and chose not to every time.

          It’s not the voters’ fault that a heavily corporate-friendly party doesn’t represent them well enough to reliably get votes. That’s some victim blaming thinking right there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Good for you, but still wrong. The party fucked up. It’s their job to win elections,

            What are you even suggesting? You’ve been exposed to so much Tankie propoganda that you think its the politicians job to stuff ballot boxes and fabricate results like they do in the East?

            The dems were inifinitely the better chose. Tbats all they should ever need to be if US Voters weren’t stupid assholes who stayed home.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              What are you even suggesting?

              That the party move to the left to get more voters and win. They moved to the right knowing that they would get no additional voters and lost.

              But at least you didn’t have to abandon the unconditional support for genocide that will always define the centrist wing of the party.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The Dems fielded a candidate with potential, in a binary race against the absolute worst candidate ever.

      I am sorry but this is nonsense. Kamala Harris’s best point was that she wasn’t Trump.

      Kamala Harris toned down her attacks on big business, she made no plans to improve America’s health care system other than vague promises to cancel debt, touted the endorsement of war criminal Dick Cheney who wanted to invade seven countries in five years and whom was partially responsible for the deaths of a million, spent half as much time focusing on the most important issues during her campaign compared to Trump, and touted a Fortune 500 investment banking company‘s endorsement for her economic plans which made her look like an out of touch elitist.

      All Harris brought to the table was “freedom” meanwhile Trump came out with right wing populist rhetoric and people seemed to like Trump’s rhetoric more considering that they have long since become disillusioned with the Status Quo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Her Tax Plan was to tax the rich, if anything was watered down it was the media you were spoonfed without an ounce of skepticism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The problem wasn’t her idea of taxing the rich, it was touting the endorsement of bankers in regards for her economic plans:

          “is why Goldman Sachs . . . is why Moody’s, which is why Wharton School of Business, which is why 16 Nobel laureates, have collectively determined after analyzing our plans . . . mine would strengthen the economy, his would weaken it.” - Kamala Harris

          Especially when the one’s that endorsed her economic plans can only be described as:

          a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money "

          Is touting the endorsement of bankers and Bush era war criminals really the most effective strategy that the democrat party can muster?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Its a strategy, not the best, and it should be enough. Hopefully they learn from this and do better, but it should have been enough. People should have been voting in record shattering numbers for her.

            When even the Oligarchs think the GOP candidate is too dangerous to American Democracy, thats the canary.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Whose job was it to get their message out?

          Centrists seem to think that because the press is their personal PR arm during the primaries, they’re their allies during the general. It ain’t so.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      The first job of a political party is to win elections, because that predicates action on any issues they care about.

      Saying we shouldn’t blame the party for losing is like saying we shouldn’t blame a mechanic for not knowing how to open the hood of a car.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Centrists would rather lose to trump than win with a progressive. You got exactly what you wanted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Progressive ideals? Democrats can’t even spell it, let alone legislate it without corporate strings attached. Incisive critique of bipartisan failure and urgent call for accountability.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

  • Kompressor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Oh they’ve been wasted in the back of this party bus for a while telling everyone to calm down and stop being so frantic and everything’s fine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    Stop voting for establishment politicians.

    If they’re part of the Obama/Clinton crew, they need to go.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      That’s part of the problem. In some states there are basically only establishment dems on the ballot. The popular dems at the moment are AOC and Bernie who are from NYC (Bronx) and Vermont respectively. Both of those areas are solid blue.

      I’m out on the west coast, another very blue area, and the vibe is to primary out a few dems who are bending the knee

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    How dare you say that on Lemmy, or Reddit for that matter! Democrats and liberal ideology can do NO WRONG in these parts!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      Right? Look at how downvoted OP is as well as all the replies that are also critical of Democrats…

      … Oh wait, it looks like you’re full of shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Lol… you call these comments “critical of Democrats?” Have you even READ what they say about Republicans around these parts?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          It took you a week to come up with “people criticise Rebulicans”?

          As it has been some time since I posted my comment, I will remind you that what your said was:

          Democrats and liberal ideology can do NO WRONG in these parts!

          Despite the fact that Democrats are clearly being criticised. You’re just moving the goal posts and vaguely referencing comments that might exist somewhere.