• Avid AmoebaOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Likely binary blobs from vendors like Debian’s non-free-firmware.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          We will see, unless there is an “official” announcement of some sort for the exacts contents of that github repo prior to preorder closing.

          The current README contents do not do justice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      323 months ago

      Does it use just standard watch bands? It looks like it, but I didn’t see it mentioned.

      One of the things I find ridiculous about other smart watches is that they use proprietary bands. When I found out that people are paying $60+ for a silicon band for an Apple watch, it blew my mind. Also that people put screen protectors or cases on their Apple watches because their $500+ watch doesn’t even have a crystal lens, and is prone to scratching.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Is that typical? I guess Apple sells watch bands at that price, but I’ve never bought a $60 Apple branded watch band. With the ubiquity of Apple Watches it’s not hard to find inexpensive Apple Watch bands even if they are proprietary. I don’t think that’s the case for other smartwatches, though.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    My GearS3 finally kicked it, after 8 years, and my other watch is even older than that, so the more premium rePebble is actually quite appealing. If i decide to get an update, i’m still debating looking at something like the Garmin Vivoactive though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I have a Garmin Instinct and I can definitely recommend their hardware, but their mobile app to link for notifications and health stats is flaming hot garbage and never actually worked for me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    393 months ago

    Why would they choose to name the watch “Core 2 Duo” when that’s the name of an Intel processor? And why are both watches a “2” variant? They need a new marketing person.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      And why are both watches a “2” variant?

      Because this is the next generation of the original Pebble watches.

      Core 2 Duo

      I’ll actually be surprised if this makes it to launch without Intel perhaps making a few legal calls and prompting a device name change.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        That is not how trademarks work. They are purpose specific. I still have no idea why they would want to name it the same as an old processor, but I doubt it’s actually an issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        103 months ago

        The most recent Intel Core 2 Duo was discontinued in 2008. I doubt Intel would be able to convince anyone that this is a competing product or would cause any customer confusion. No one is going to be looking for a low end processor from over a decade ago and accidentally buy a watch.

        • edric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          Corporations are extremely protective about their branding, even if it’s for discontinued products. If this product gets any negative press, it can still affect their branding if people associate it with Intel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          133 months ago

          The point is not that it is being used, the point is that corporations must protect their trademarks or else they may lose the exclusive rights to them. Intel also still uses the “Core” branding on their modern CPU’s so it wouldn’t be a stretch for them to try and continue legally protecting “Core 2 Duo” under the guise of retaining the “Core” part of their trademarks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            They do need to protect their branding, but only if it’s likely to be viewed as “similar”. there’s no reasonable risk of people thinking that a watch and an old processor are the same.
            There’s a lot of products with similar names that haven’t had issues.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Wouldn’t this be the fourth generation? Pebble Time was the second generation and Pebble 2 was the third generation.

    • FireWire400
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      when that’s the name of an Intel processor?

      It’s totally a reference to that, it has to pretty much… Why? Idk, nostalgia? Duo as in black and white maybe

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        The two colours of the first Intel MacBook by Apple, which had Core 2 Duo processors…

        Quite an hommage indeed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      Core 2 Duo is also a terrible name from Intel in the first place. I did place my repebble order, hopefully it will serve me well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    743 months ago

    I’m pretty excited about this; my Pebble Time was the best watch I’ve even owned - smart or otherwise.

    That said, I don’t think I’m going to be preordering this given how badly the last Pebble Kickstarter went. For those who weren’t around at the time, Pebble (whose CEO is behind this venture) built his whole business around Kickstarter. The first 2 generations were wildly successful, but for the third generation they massively overextended themselves trying to get hardware into mainstream retailers, prioritised building stock for retail channels (because contracts) and ran out of cash before shipping for the majority of backers who had bankrolled this whole thing. Eventually everyone who hadn’t had their orders fulfilled got a refund, but that was only because FitBit decided to buy them. Eric seems like a nice guy and great at the technology - and I’m not saying that I could run a business any better - but I think I’ll wait until there is stock on hand for me to buy outright before I hand over my cash

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      He also screwed a lot of the employees on the way out from Pebble, and he also bailed on Beeper the minute it got complicated. Sold it to Matt Mullenweg a year or two after getting pimp-slapped by Apple because he had no real plan for what to do if Apple started banning the devices he was using as Matrix bridges. He gave up after like three days, it was honestly genuinely pathetic. This was a paid service and he fucked it all up for anyone using iMessage on it.

      I have personal experiences with Beeper that make me less than trust Eric Migicovsky, and I really don’t think he seems like a “nice guy.” He actively sucks, doesn’t have plans for sustainability and then sells it all off to someone else at a personal profit while the people doing the actual work get fucked out of a job.

    • mesa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      Yep im also going to wait til its out to make a judgement call.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        Ditto, even though I’m in the market to replace my smartwatch since the buttons fell off.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      513 months ago

      From their FAQ, emphasis mine:

      You shouldn’t get one if…

      You need a perfectly polished smartwatch. This project is a labour of love rather than a startup trying to sell millions of watches. There may be some rough edges (literally). Things will get delayed. Some features will not be ready at launch. Things could break. Things could not last as long as you’d like. The only thing we can guarantee is that it will be awesome and a lot of fun! Every time you look down at your watch, you will smile

      So yeah, I’d say your take is pretty accurate. At least they’re honest lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        My concern isn’t that things will get delayed, it’s that I’ll give them my money and get nothing in return

        • Thurstylark
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Understandable, which is why I’m choosing to not preorder. However, they also have a full refund policy that’s good until your unit is being prepared to ship, and several notifications leading up to that point. One of the best ways to handle preorders I’ve encountered.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          That’s. Uh… the entire idea of a kickstarter.

          It may crash and burn. Don’t want that, don’t back anything on kickstarter.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            … so I shouldn’t use the CEOs history of bankruptcy and failed a Kickstarter when judging if I think it is going to succeed or not?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            The idea is that you judge each Kickstarter venture on its likelihood of doing that vs actually delivering.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      I always feel nervous preordering anything. I got a new Fitbit so I think I have some time before it fails so I can see how this rePebble works out. If it is as good as it looks I might just get it. 30 day estimated battery life is amazing

  • FireWire400
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    I kinda wanted a Pebble for a while, might as well get one now

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    I’ve been procrastinating for weeks about setting up a dev environment to help contribute to the codebase, but I didn’t procrastinate at all in preordering a Core-2. My Pebble Time might be the last piece of consumer tech that I was both excited for and a satisfied customer of.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Are they going to support it with an app?

    Ope!

    We will publish a companion mobile app for Android and iOS. My friend and past Pebble colleague, Steve, recently joined us to lead this effort. He’s joining crc32, long-time Cobble developer, who has been working with me since last summer. We’ll also be working on an updated SDK for creating new PebbleOS watchfaces or apps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Got a PineTime for Christmas and so far been very pleased with it. I found the PineTimeStyle watchface and it’s been a bit like coming home to Pebble, but I do miss the wide array of watchface choices and effortless customization.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        I missed out on the 1st gen pebble but had a buddy who loved his. Y’all may be talking me in to checking this new one out.

        And agreed on the pine faces. I’ve been of half a mind to learn how to make them so I could have more variety.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      This is neat but the selling point for me with the Pebble is the e-ink display. If repebble fails though, my next watch will be a Pine. Hopefully my Versa 2 holds on for a bit longer 🤞

      • lime!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it’s an “e-paper” display, which annoyingly is nothing like an e-ink display. it’s an LCD with a memory chip in it. the bangle.js also has one, which can do eight colors. so better than the black and white one, but worse than the 64-color one. also it’s half the price of the cheaper pebble…

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        You should just get one anyway. It’s $30.

  • spamspeicher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    IDon’tNeedAPebbleIDon’tNeedAPebbleIDon’tNeedAPebbleIDon’tNeedAPebbleIDon’tNeedAPebbleIDon’tNeedAPebble

    Aaand preordered. The Pebble Steel was one of the best smartwatches I’ve ever had. I loved that thing and I’m still pissed that I sold the steel a few years ago.

    • Avid AmoebaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Absolute best. None of the Fitbits I’ve had were better. None of them detect when I’ve woken correctly in order to enable/disable notifications.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I am wearing my OG Kickstarter Pebble right now, 12 years and still getting 8 days battery out of it.

    I think I will be getting a new Core Time 2

    Edit: added picture

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        It has the screen tearing issue, which can’t be fixed because it is one of the original ones which are glued together.

        I have to have it on the analogue watch face so the screen refreshes every second. But it has outlasted the 4 other watches I tried.

        • _haha_oh_wow_
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m using a Garmin these days. Much battery life but I miss my old Pebble.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      I had to stop wearing my pebble 2 hr when the software became too flaky to tolerate. Notifications would just randomly Go through or not, media controls would sometimes not work, and so on. But can’t wait to go back, as my alternatives are all fundamentally flawed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        I asked my partner if she wanted a new pebble, she has a nice little Garmin, her response:

        I do like my Garmin in terms of a watch and the feel but the app is shit

        Funny how she lost her last one:

        Her strap broke on the pebble time, my (at the time) 15 month old saw it on the bench, and asked why she wasn’t wearing it. She said it is broken, a few days later she was going to get a new strap and the watch was gone. The 15 month old, had thrown it in the bin…rubbish day had already happened.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        I’m just using gadget bridge now, most of the original functionality is gone. I can’t be arsed jumping through the hoops to install the original pebble app on my phone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          I had no issue getting the app on my phone, but it wasn’t really working anymore. I’d also have to swap the battery and reprint the buttons again. I’m just waiting for the new pebble now, it’s only a few months now.

  • Kane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 months ago

    This is a blast from the past

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    How are they allowed to give it the exact same name as an Intel CPU line?

    I’ve got a Core 2 Duo around here somewhere…

    • Biscuit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Honestly, makes me want it more. Are our brains broken?