France’s research minister said a French scientist was denied entry to the US this month after immigration officers at an airport searched his phone and found messages in which he had expressed criticism of the Trump administration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I wonder how they search it. I doubt they manually read every fucking text message in all apps, so I guess they search for keywords or something.

    So, let’s say someone wanted to get someone in trouble, they could write them an email with some “incriminating” white text on white background and have them stopped by the thought police at the border.

    It would be funny if they stopped some Canadian Mexican returning from Cancun and found shittalk about Trump on his phone.

    Btw. Does anyone have Ted Cruz’s email address?

  • Hikuro-93
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hey, that’s a good thing in my book, I guess.

    Same way as America prospered with talent fleeing a corrupt Europe in the past, now Europe can get that lost talent back from a corrupt America. The more they feel unwelcome and undervalued the more they will flock or stay wherever their talent can flourish and advance our progress as a society.

    No complaints from me on that. 🤷‍♂️

  • Cosmic Cleric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    immigration officers at an airport searched his phone

    There’s no mention in the article if this search was voluntary, or not.

    Edit: For the downvoters, please point out where I was wrong; I’d honestly really like to know if it was voluntary or not.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      WTF is a voluntary search?

      “Attention all flight passengers. This is ICE on the speaker. If you want to be searched, please raise your hand and we will get to you shortly.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      It’s “voluntary” in the sense that either you allow it or you don’t get into the country.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Consent in a situation like this is difficult to establish, to the point of it being pointless. Your comment implies to me that you think if the person said “OK” to a search request then whatever happened next is their own fault.

      Consider just the situation where you’re in the immigration line and two uniformed officers walk up to you and say, “please come with us.” If you go with them, is that voluntary? If you say “yes” I just think “voluntary” doesn’t hold much meaning. What happens if you don’t volunteer to go with them? Surely, they say, “come with us now or you’ll be arrested.” And if you don’t volunteer at that point, they’ll physically restrain you and take you away.

      Since most people are able to understand the subtext of the situation, they’re able to tell that, “please come with us” actually means “you are required to come with us now. You may either walk of your own accord, or we will take you captive and punish you beyond whatever we initially intended.” So, there’s not any consent happening. Just deciding whether being beaten and dragged away in public would be helpful to you, and in many cases it is not.

      You might be confusing US law around unlawful search and seizure with US law around border crossings. While the ACLU’s position is that the 4th amendment trumps CBP, CBP’s position is that it does not and that you cannot stop them.

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Consent in a situation like this is difficult to establish, to the point of it being pointless.

        Hard disagree.

        Did they ask him if they could search and he said yes, or no? Or did they just take his device away from him and did a search without his permission?

        Consenting to a search, or have one mandated by a judge’s order, is one of the fundamental pillars of citizen rights and laws in this country.

        Was it a legal or illegal search? That’s not a pointless question to ask.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I notice you asked for an explanation and then only sort-of read the first sentence.

            No, I read the whole thing, fully. I just disagreed with your analogy, thought it was a bad one, too verbose and obfuscating of the subject being talked about. Also it didn’t cover someone searching your belongings with/without your permission, the subject being talked about. Law officials have more legal leeway to detain you than they do to search your belongings without your permission, so your analogy doesn’t work (especially when you throw in beatings into it).

            Also, didn’t think your last paragraph was legally accurate, but didn’t want to bother arguing the point, since ‘amendment > law > policy/rule’ is a well-known given. I’m aware of the difference. When I asked my original question, it was to confirm if the border enforcement people were actually honoring the 4th amendment, or not, whatever their thought processes were.

            I did appreciate you taking the time to reply (and civilly at that) though, thank you. P.S. I hope the tone of my reply wasn’t too harsh, it wasn’t meant to be rude, just straightforward.

            This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Welcome to Trumps America.

    Where everything that Trump doesnt like, or is legitimately critical of him, or is just an opinion that Republicans don’t like… is Terrorism.

    Seems an awful lot like that oppressive government tyranny the ammosexuals were feverishly polishing their rifle barrels to, doesnt it? I wonder why they are all so suspiciously silent! /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Usually I respect the honesty more than the subterfuge.

      But when it’s Nazi’s. Nope. Wouldn’t piss on them if they were on fire.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        You respect the honesty because it reveals people’s character. And if a person thinks that Taylor Swift is an awful singer, then cool, you can agree or disagree.

        But when it’s honesty about contempt for your fellow man? A punch in the face is the only thing that works.

      • B-TR3E
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        One thing authoritarian systems have in common is a permanent atmosphere of fear. Honesty is highly unwanted there, integrity will get you straight into trouble. Fascist systems are built on hypocrisy and fear.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    All countries should advise their citizens against travelling to the USA. Edit: fixed typo.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    293 months ago

    Fucking hell. Freedom of speech isn’t a thing anymore and all those shitheads who were crying about simply being called out for saying things are fine with the government punishing people for saying things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    The US has turned in Russia for real. Russians were checking phones at the border when the war started.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 months ago

    I seriously doubt the intelligence of anyone still traveling to the USA. I hope whatever project he is working on is not critical.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You sound like an internet addict who never lived real life. What the hell is with this logic?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      These types of things are usually scheduled well in advance. Just one example, it is worth noting that I am not saying that this was the reason the scientist traveled to the United States, scientific centers with certain types of very expensive equipment usually rent it to projects from other scientific institutes and universities, sometimes with such high demand that you can wait years for it to be available for your project.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      these travels are scheduled months even years in advance depending on the field of study, nobody could have predicted how much worse second Trumps term would be. also other than travelling to somewhere where its bad much more reliable indicator of low intelligence are very confident statements outside of one’s own depth.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 months ago

    I told my wife before I could never go to the US because of the stuff I write online, now I’m sure of it

    • MOARbid1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      You’re not missing a fucking thing, buddy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Personally I’d like to visit the US for their national parks, or whatever is left after this administration policies.

    • Guy Ingonito
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      These guys are handing their phones over to show work itinerary in their emails amd the immigration officers are then going through all their other emails and messages.

      Never, never, never, hand your unlocked phone over to an immigration officer. Print everything you need out before hand.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Yeah but he can just say “hand over your unlocked phone or I will reject your entry” and then it’s the same thing

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        If you use fingerprint or face scan to unlock your phone, they can compel you to unlock your phone.

        If you use a PIN, they cannot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    How’d they get into his phone? Face or fingerprint?

    Make sure you turn off biometrics before traveling. They can’t force you to disclose a passcode.

    EDIT: Actually, if you have to travel to the USA, wipe your phone before you leave.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      So, what if I as an american, travel to canada. On my re-entry, am i going to get my phone searched for anti-maga stuff?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      IIRC they can compel you to unlock your phone. Or just deny you entry if you don’t. It’s best to make sure you travel with a ‘clean’ phone and PC, border patrol got ridiculous powers in the patriot act and nobody’s ever rolled any of it back despite decades of abuses.

        • x-Cell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          As a Latin American, the US is the very last county I want to visit on the entire continent. Literally the only thing that I kind of want to see there is the Lego store in NYC.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          I’ve been very purposefully avoiding the US ever since the Patriot Act exactly because it became possible for the TSA to riffle through your electronics (even confiscate them) and do this kind of shit.

          Then on top of that festering pit of autocracy which, by the way, nobody reversed in all this time, Trump added the risk of ICE detention and “free trip to El Salvador (to go check a mega prison there)”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yep, 12 years of Democrats in charge and none of them did anything to reign in this whole apparatus that could easily be abused by an autocrat. Now Trump has a turnkey surveillance state that can be turned on anyone in the country. All your internet traffic, current location, licence plate readers, face recognition, etc. It was all created to alternately catch terrorists or pedophiles, and now Trump is going to use it against anyone he doesn’t like.

            And it’s not like nobody was warned, there was plenty of dissent about the patriot act from experts and the people, but politicians were just like ‘don’t worry, it’ll only be used against terrorists’. Guess what, everyone’s going to be deemed a terrorist now. They’re trying to charge Luigi with terrorism already (and those are state charges in a Democratic state).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Years ago they would already ask for social media accounts and email address on US visa forms, it was creepy back them , scary now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      How’d they get into his phone? Face or fingerprint?

      I was looking for this as well. It seems like a rather important piece of info for the article to leave out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      They will also ask you for your password for online accounts and refuse entry if you don’t. And as we have all seen recently that does not necessarily mean “next flight home”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    I have a burner but it seems like you need to create social media accounts filled with non political content and keep them updated so they don’t look fake. Anyone know how to automate this?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      don’t do this. it’s a waste of your time. if you’re actually scared of the us government, the answer is to stop using social media

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Not just the US government.

        The issue is border control won’t believe you don’t have any social media accounts and might refuse entry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          What if all my accounts are old and haven’t been updated in a decade? That’s kind of outrageous.