France’s research minister said a French scientist was denied entry to the US this month after immigration officers at an airport searched his phone and found messages in which he had expressed criticism of the Trump administration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1128 days ago

    I told my wife before I could never go to the US because of the stuff I write online, now I’m sure of it

    • MOARbid1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1028 days ago

      You’re not missing a fucking thing, buddy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        528 days ago

        Personally I’d like to visit the US for their national parks, or whatever is left after this administration policies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      928 days ago

      These guys are handing their phones over to show work itinerary in their emails amd the immigration officers are then going through all their other emails and messages.

      Never, never, never, hand your unlocked phone over to an immigration officer. Print everything you need out before hand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    029 days ago

    I have a burner but it seems like you need to create social media accounts filled with non political content and keep them updated so they don’t look fake. Anyone know how to automate this?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      don’t do this. it’s a waste of your time. if you’re actually scared of the us government, the answer is to stop using social media

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        Not just the US government.

        The issue is border control won’t believe you don’t have any social media accounts and might refuse entry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          328 days ago

          What if all my accounts are old and haven’t been updated in a decade? That’s kind of outrageous.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    How’d they get into his phone? Face or fingerprint?

    Make sure you turn off biometrics before traveling. They can’t force you to disclose a passcode.

    EDIT: Actually, if you have to travel to the USA, wipe your phone before you leave.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      So, what if I as an american, travel to canada. On my re-entry, am i going to get my phone searched for anti-maga stuff?

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        The US Government cannot deny US Citizens from entering the US.* However, they can (and mostly likely will) seize all your belongings and detain you for up to 48 hours. So its best to wipe your devices before crossing the border (both ways). They can deny permanent residents (aka: green card holders) from entry.

        *for now

        But my real advice is: Unless you are intending to migrate permanently, do not cross the US borders (neither in nor out) under the current administration.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        229 days ago

        They could try. They can compel you to open it with Face ID or fingerprint. If that’s turned off they cannot compel you to disclose your passcode. They can seize your phone. They cannot prevent you from entering the country.

        They’re probably only going to do it with some kind of suspicion. But that suspicion could be the border protection officer is having a bad day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 days ago

          Thanks. It’s fucking wild the things we have to be concerned about in this upside down timeline.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          They cannot prevent you from entering the country.

          Only applies to US citizens. Any non-citizen, including Permanent Residents (aka: Green Card holders), could be denied entry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      They will also ask you for your password for online accounts and refuse entry if you don’t. And as we have all seen recently that does not necessarily mean “next flight home”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      429 days ago

      IIRC they can compel you to unlock your phone. Or just deny you entry if you don’t. It’s best to make sure you travel with a ‘clean’ phone and PC, border patrol got ridiculous powers in the patriot act and nobody’s ever rolled any of it back despite decades of abuses.

        • x-Cell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 days ago

          As a Latin American, the US is the very last county I want to visit on the entire continent. Literally the only thing that I kind of want to see there is the Lego store in NYC.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          229 days ago

          I’ve been very purposefully avoiding the US ever since the Patriot Act exactly because it became possible for the TSA to riffle through your electronics (even confiscate them) and do this kind of shit.

          Then on top of that festering pit of autocracy which, by the way, nobody reversed in all this time, Trump added the risk of ICE detention and “free trip to El Salvador (to go check a mega prison there)”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Yep, 12 years of Democrats in charge and none of them did anything to reign in this whole apparatus that could easily be abused by an autocrat. Now Trump has a turnkey surveillance state that can be turned on anyone in the country. All your internet traffic, current location, licence plate readers, face recognition, etc. It was all created to alternately catch terrorists or pedophiles, and now Trump is going to use it against anyone he doesn’t like.

            And it’s not like nobody was warned, there was plenty of dissent about the patriot act from experts and the people, but politicians were just like ‘don’t worry, it’ll only be used against terrorists’. Guess what, everyone’s going to be deemed a terrorist now. They’re trying to charge Luigi with terrorism already (and those are state charges in a Democratic state).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 days ago

      Years ago they would already ask for social media accounts and email address on US visa forms, it was creepy back them , scary now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      How’d they get into his phone? Face or fingerprint?

      I was looking for this as well. It seems like a rather important piece of info for the article to leave out.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Here’s how the borders work:

        “Sir/Ma’am, please unlock your device”

        “No”

        “Entry Denied”


        (Except for US Citizens, they cannot be denied entry* even if they refuse to unlock their device, however, their devices could be confiscated

        *for now)

  • Cosmic Cleric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    immigration officers at an airport searched his phone

    There’s no mention in the article if this search was voluntary, or not.

    Edit: For the downvoters, please point out where I was wrong; I’d honestly really like to know if it was voluntary or not.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      029 days ago

      It’s “voluntary” in the sense that either you allow it or you don’t get into the country.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 days ago

      Consent in a situation like this is difficult to establish, to the point of it being pointless. Your comment implies to me that you think if the person said “OK” to a search request then whatever happened next is their own fault.

      Consider just the situation where you’re in the immigration line and two uniformed officers walk up to you and say, “please come with us.” If you go with them, is that voluntary? If you say “yes” I just think “voluntary” doesn’t hold much meaning. What happens if you don’t volunteer to go with them? Surely, they say, “come with us now or you’ll be arrested.” And if you don’t volunteer at that point, they’ll physically restrain you and take you away.

      Since most people are able to understand the subtext of the situation, they’re able to tell that, “please come with us” actually means “you are required to come with us now. You may either walk of your own accord, or we will take you captive and punish you beyond whatever we initially intended.” So, there’s not any consent happening. Just deciding whether being beaten and dragged away in public would be helpful to you, and in many cases it is not.

      You might be confusing US law around unlawful search and seizure with US law around border crossings. While the ACLU’s position is that the 4th amendment trumps CBP, CBP’s position is that it does not and that you cannot stop them.

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Consent in a situation like this is difficult to establish, to the point of it being pointless.

        Hard disagree.

        Did they ask him if they could search and he said yes, or no? Or did they just take his device away from him and did a search without his permission?

        Consenting to a search, or have one mandated by a judge’s order, is one of the fundamental pillars of citizen rights and laws in this country.

        Was it a legal or illegal search? That’s not a pointless question to ask.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            I notice you asked for an explanation and then only sort-of read the first sentence.

            No, I read the whole thing, fully. I just disagreed with your analogy, thought it was a bad one, too verbose and obfuscating of the subject being talked about. Also it didn’t cover someone searching your belongings with/without your permission, the subject being talked about. Law officials have more legal leeway to detain you than they do to search your belongings without your permission, so your analogy doesn’t work (especially when you throw in beatings into it).

            Also, didn’t think your last paragraph was legally accurate, but didn’t want to bother arguing the point, since ‘amendment > law > policy/rule’ is a well-known given. I’m aware of the difference. When I asked my original question, it was to confirm if the border enforcement people were actually honoring the 4th amendment, or not, whatever their thought processes were.

            I did appreciate you taking the time to reply (and civilly at that) though, thank you. P.S. I hope the tone of my reply wasn’t too harsh, it wasn’t meant to be rude, just straightforward.

            This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 days ago

      WTF is a voluntary search?

      “Attention all flight passengers. This is ICE on the speaker. If you want to be searched, please raise your hand and we will get to you shortly.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I wonder how they search it. I doubt they manually read every fucking text message in all apps, so I guess they search for keywords or something.

    So, let’s say someone wanted to get someone in trouble, they could write them an email with some “incriminating” white text on white background and have them stopped by the thought police at the border.

    It would be funny if they stopped some Canadian Mexican returning from Cancun and found shittalk about Trump on his phone.

    Btw. Does anyone have Ted Cruz’s email address?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      529 days ago

      Usually I respect the honesty more than the subterfuge.

      But when it’s Nazi’s. Nope. Wouldn’t piss on them if they were on fire.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        529 days ago

        You respect the honesty because it reveals people’s character. And if a person thinks that Taylor Swift is an awful singer, then cool, you can agree or disagree.

        But when it’s honesty about contempt for your fellow man? A punch in the face is the only thing that works.

      • B-TR3E
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        One thing authoritarian systems have in common is a permanent atmosphere of fear. Honesty is highly unwanted there, integrity will get you straight into trouble. Fascist systems are built on hypocrisy and fear.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    All countries should advise their citizens against travelling to the USA. Edit: fixed typo.

    • FundMECFS
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Who would have thought. (Literally everyone)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        Studies have consistwntly shown that the more education one gets, the more their political view skews left. It explains why colleges, staffed and managed by PhDs, tend to be left-wing. That’s why the Conservative Propaganda Machine has to constantly attack education.

  • ScotinDub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    629 days ago

    Amazing to think that they criticised “freedom of speech” in Europe

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1929 days ago

    The Nazis literally did this with a law. They made it illegal to be critical of the party. Fuck the alarm, we’ve already been had.

    • Hikuro-93
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Yup. “But we’re not there yet”, so they say. “Too soon to act rashly”.

      'First they started mass deportations, but it wasn’t a corrupt system yet, so we did not act.

      Then they started refusing people who were critical of them, but it wasn’t a corrupt system yet, so we did not act.

      Then they started blatantly taking money from the poor and give it to the rich, but it wasn’t a corrupt system yet, so we did not act.

      Finally they fully took over the nation, but by then all the people who would have acted were already gone and dealt with.’

      Not all, but the gist of it. Thankfully some bubbles of resistance are starting to form in the US, but the main people who were elected to uphold the law and fight this democraticly are already bribed or blackmailed, so it’s in great part up to the people, and whatever stance the army ends up taking when they are forced to choose between loyalty to the constitution, or an individual.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        329 days ago

        the scientists were smart enough to flee Germany or places that nazis occupied. i see this going to happen with USa if not already, US already has a problem with shortages in some areas of stem. its a complex set of problems all around, this latest fiasco just adds into it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      728 days ago

      Please don’t say “Nazis”. Like, which Nazis, the 1940s German ones or 2025 American ones? It’s confusing. Please be clear next time you talk about them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          428 days ago

          Yeah, but when you say “The Nazis literally did this with a law” it’s not entirely clear if you mean the German Nazis from the 1940s or the American Nazis from the 2020s

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              228 days ago

              It’s important to distinguish the two. One was 85 years ago, the other is today… there might be other differences but can’t think of any right now.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                528 days ago

                Nazis are Nazis. Ask the people in that El Salvadoran prison if the boots forcing their necks down look like 40s or 2020s Nazis. Their agony is your answer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    229 days ago

    The US has turned in Russia for real. Russians were checking phones at the border when the war started.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    So people these days still not understand that border crossing are a sensitive location?

    Like, literally, anywhere you go, the first thing you should do before leaving is encrypt and reinstall / factory reset (which should delete all encryption keys to the old data) the devices. And if you have very sensitive stuff, use a disk overwrite program, and for phones start recording a video with the phone aimed at like a wall (and turn off the audio recording). Leave it recording overnight and it should fill up your phone. Use 4K recording to fill the storage faster. Then just wipe the phone again. Now, DONT DOWNLOAD ANYTHING THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE. Load the phone with innocuous things like pet photos, nature, etc… and act like a “normie”. Don’t have anything critical of any politician, especially not of the country you’re visiting, nor of its allies. Its best to not have any social media apps, preferrably, you should never post things under your name, but if you already did have such accounts, delete them.

    If they ask you “Do you have any social media accounts” you say “I don’t recall having any” or “I don’t think so” and “I’m not the type of person to use social media”. Or alternatively, you can have a social media account that have only non-political posts, and show then that.

    Edit: To be clear, don’t travel to the US. But this should be how you prepare for border crossings, even if it isn’t the US.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 days ago

      This is completely unnecessary if you travel to a western democracy, like an EU country, Canada, Australia, etc. America is no longer part of that group though, sadly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      I think Europeans, coming from a sane place where border crossings are more of a formality than anything else, don’t expect a plane to the US to be a time machine/teleporter to East Berlin.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 days ago

      This might be normal opsec for a foreign agent, but absolutely ridiculous to expect average people or some French doctor to adhere to.

      The reality is this issue would never have happened just three months ago, and the reason it’s happening now is fascism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          228 days ago

          Phone searches: not new. People being rejected at the border because of posts critical of the incoming president, yes, that is very much a new thing.

          Would love to see some stories of people rejected at the border for criticism of Biden or Obama if you can find any.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            128 days ago

            People already worried then. There was no need for the law to grand this power. We don’t need laws if wo rely on people to be just.