• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 days ago

    Well if Google is forced to sell it off or spin Android off into its own company, we’ll see if it remains private.

  • Badabinski
    link
    fedilink
    610 days ago

    Possibly incorrect summary: Android is moving from a bazaar development style to a cathedral development style if I understand it correctly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1510 days ago

    Fuck, looks like it’s time to start looking at more alternatives to Android phones.

    Already got an old one rooted. We need a solid Linux alternative or potentially a European company to start development.

    If any of y’all know of a good, usable platform, I’d love to know about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 days ago

    Tldr:

    To balance AOSP’s open nature with its product development strategy, Google maintains two primary Android branches: the public AOSP branch and its internal development branch. The AOSP branch is accessible to anyone, while Google’s internal branch is restricted to companies with a Google Mobile Services (GMS)licensing agreement.

    Beginning next week, all Android development will occur within Google’s internal branches, and the source code for changes will only be released when Google publishes a new branch containing those changes. As this is already the practice for most Android component changes, Google is simply consolidating its development efforts into a single branch.