The patient had the organ transplanted at a hospital in Ohio in December and died in January, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Lynn Sutfin said.

A subsequent investigation that also involved the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Ohio Department of Health determined the patient got rabies from the donated organ. Sutfin did not specify which organ was transplanted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    203 months ago

    According to the CDC, fewer than 10 people die annually from rabies in the U.S. And it happening due to organ transplants is very rare, but not unheard of; in 2013, a patient who received a kidney transplant died from rabies.

    So it’s happened before…cool cool, cool…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      And if it’s only 10 deaths per year, and there was a previous death like roughly 10 years ago, that’s at about 2%, which I assume is reasonably high enough to test for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        Where are you getting that 2%?

        I assume that 2 rabies deaths in 10 years for however many organ transplants in that same period is much less than a 2% incidence. A quick google tells me that there were over 48k organ transplants in the US in 2024 alone.

      • cowfodder
        link
        fedilink
        123 months ago

        Your math is off by a bit there. In 2024 alone there were ~48,000 organ transplants performed in the US. Now, that was a record high. So if all ~10 people who died of rabies in 2024 had been organ donors and somehow it wasn’t caught that they died from rabies that’s still only a 0.02% chance of getting an infected organ. That number is still wrong because all of those cases were caught and their organs would not have been donated, plus only about 58% of the adult US population are listed as organ donors. Also, it’s fewer than 10 people, not ~10 people. The actual average number of people who have died from diagnosed rabies in the US since 2000 is ~2.5 per year.

        So, overall, the chance of a registered organ donor dying from rabies and their organs still being donated is remarkably low.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck that. You better drop my ass into a coma or straight up kill me before I have to go through a rabies death.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    I’m sure RFK’s CDC will get right to the bottom of what happened here and prevent it from happening again /s

  • Gordon Calhoun
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    Well now I have another question to add to my list of things to discuss with the surgeon before I accept any organ transplants.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    393 months ago

    Does this mean that whoever dontated the organ also died from rabies without having been accurately diagnosed, or does it mean that someone was carrying rabies?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They were more than likely infected but not yet showing symptoms. Carrying rabies but not a carrier of rabies. If you get bit in the foot, it takes awhile to reach your brain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      If someone died of rabies, it would certainly be known that it was rabies. The symptoms are pretty obvious and it’s not likely it would be mistaken for anything else.

      More likely, they were infected and died of some other cause before symptoms started showing, which can take as little as two weeks or potentially over a year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            Yeah, its a really crazy virus. If you get bit or scratched by a mammal, that you don’t know for certain is vaccinated, get the vaccine.

            • Komodo Rodeo
              link
              fedilink
              63 months ago

              Agreed, same deal as with tetanus. The last time that I got cut by rusty metal and went to the hospital, the intake nurses seemed annoyed with me for showing up with such a minor injury (two stitches needed only). When the MD checked my records, they told me that it was a good thing I’d come in for the stitches and tetanus shot, because my previous one’s span of effect would have ended at a few months earlier. You can’t take this shit for granted, if you blow it off or delay treatment it could kill you. No lockjaw for me, thank you very much.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                But also, tetanus is commonly misunderstood. Scapes and scratches are extremely unlikely to result in tetanus, regardless of what causes it. Rust isn’t any more likely to transmit tetanus.

                Tetanus is an anaerobic microbe that can only really survive in deep cuts and punctures where air isn’t able to reach the wound. The spores are basically everywhere… But the spores only bloom and become dangerous when they come into contact with blood. Once they bloom, oxygen will kill them. So you don’t need to worry about it for surface-level scratches and scrapes, because the air will kill off any blooms. The only reason it is commonly associated with rust is because one of the more common puncture wounds is from stepping on rusty things.

                • Komodo Rodeo
                  link
                  fedilink
                  03 months ago

                  Huh, interesting. Thanks for the info, I was under the misconception that it was directly tied to the rusty metal itself.

              • Optional
                link
                fedilink
                33 months ago

                Can confirm, even minor effects are lifelong and annoying AF.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 months ago

                Anything deep enough to warrant stitches should absolutely be treated in a hospital imo.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              43 months ago

              I used to live in an old farmhouse. Drafty as fuck. There was a bat who kept getting inside every few months, and I’d just shoo it out or catch it and let it go outside. One night it got inside and in the course of looking for a way out, it accidentally scratched my daughter. It barely even broke her skin—there was the tiniest mark where blood welled just the slightest bit.

              So when I captured him, I had to take him in for testing. Which I hated, knowing it was a death sentence, but you can’t take your chances with rabies at fucking all.

              Of course, the bat wasn’t rabid, my daughter was just fine, and we probably had to suffer a few more mosquitoes that year. That was the last time we had any bats in our house.

              Now, we have a very nice back yard with a deck we use a lot in the evenings and I wish I had my little bat buddy back to eat all the tasty bugs during the summer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                That was absolutely the right thing to do for your family. It sucks about your bat buddy though.

                If you want to help bats, you can put up a bat house. There are plans for ones online to build one yourself. Bat are really struggling, between white nose fungus and humans their populations are really declining.

                And keep a lookout for bats in need, when they get hurt they can be help. There might be a licensed bat rescue near you that could save them. I found a bat in my attic that had fallen into a bucket of water. It was winter and there was ice in with him! I was able to get him in a box and took him to a rehab the next day. He made a full recovery and was released that spring.

                Bucket the bat being looked over by the rehaber

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            Yeah, imagine getting rabies symptoms, knowing you’re going to die, and having no memory of any event that may have led to the infection.

            • Komodo Rodeo
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              A literal nightmare scenario.

              “You’re 100% going to die, but we need to know when you caught it in case it was incidentally passed to someone else.”

              shrugs

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    I am so glad I got transplanted last may because I think dialysis for 4 years might be preferable to receiving any kind of really serious medical procedures while this clown show is in charge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      They got the organ in December. While this administration is a clown show, I don’t see how that’s relevant.

  • insufferableninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    Someone needs to put together a memorial celebrity rabies awareness pro-am fun run race for the cure, i guess

  • GingaNinga
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    I’m not sure rabies is screened in donors. Thats brutal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For good reason, it’s extremely rare.

      Edit: The statistic i looked up, is less than 10 cases a year. It would be a waste of resources to test for rabies on every organ donor. But I wouldn’t be surprised if they start testing now.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        A quick search shows rabies testing is $80 to ~$200. Given the cost and time a transplant takes I would say testing for rabies would be insignificant. But health insurance companies are assholes so they probably would not cover the cost due to the rarity of the disease. Cheaper for them to let people die and families sue.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s fair, but where do you draw the line at testing for diseases? There are so many things a patient could have. I don’t think its just about insurance companies.

          Edit: my point is, at some point you are wasting precious time for the people who need the organs, and they might die. Testing for extremely rare disease/illnesses might even be considered irresponsible. You’re getting diminishing returns testing for super rare stuff, and since there are so many things that are rare, you have to make a call about what to actually test.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      I’m pretty sure it isn’t part of any normal testing. Maybe if there were symptoms in the donor that indicated rabies or their family noted they had interactions with wild animals, but typically I think it’s mostly hepatitis, HIV, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, chagas, and west Nile that are always checked for.

      • GingaNinga
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        you got it! I’m just wrapping up schooling for med lab so thanks for the refresher!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      Plus the test for rabies needs brain tissue, cant just test blood or the organ to be transplanted