cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27622066

And yet, unhitched from the menial task of transportation, the average horse today enjoys a far better quality of life than the average pre-car horse. Why? Horse girls. You see, now that the market demand for horses is no longer based on actual horsepower, horses can render the service of “just being themselves” for those who appreciate that most (in much more forgiving circumstances). In this way, horses truly are forever… and the real losers really are mankind. And its machines. In this essay, I will

  • stinerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    613 days ago

    Which will break down first? A well maintained car or a well maintained horse?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 days ago

      I hear mules have incredible range and versatility, but I do wonder if the hybridization has higher risk of certain illnesses.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 days ago

        Yeah, I wonder. From what I read, they sound healthier overall, but maybe with a higher risk of hyperlipemia?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      513 days ago

      It’s questionable whether horses would still exist for any other purpose considering we created them and brought them around the world. The only untouched wild horse left in existence is Przewalski’s horse from Central Asia, and some reintroduced/invasive NA wild mustangs.

      Without animal husbandry they would probably be about as rare as buffalo, currently only 500,000 and at one point only a confirmed 325 existed.

      The way I see it, horses currently have it pretty good on average with wide spaces, very little work to do, and they tend to live full lives as they’re not usually bred for meat. Probably happier than the average human.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        The steady march of human-driven extinctions is a terrible argument for forcibly breeding a population into the hundreds of millions for the express purpose of manual labor until death. That’s like reading I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream and being on the side of the malicious AI because it’s keeping a half dozen people alive specifically to torture them. Also living things don’t need a “purpose” merely to be alive, this is a capitalist delusion.

          • Jerkface (any/all)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            312 days ago

            Your point genuinely escapes me. I think you are just engaging in distraction, and I think it is you that you are trying to distract.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              it’s exactly that. People cant handle the cognitive dissonance in the fact that modern treatment of domesticated animals is utterly unethical.

              if you fully accept that you’re contributing to the suffering of millions by participating in the meat and dairy industries, you have to be able to live with that. I understand that it’s one of the shittier things i do. maybe I should hate myself but i dont, I’m human and complicated like everyone else, and I dont need to tell myself that all my actions are morally good. maybe one day ill quit various things, like murder and smoking

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            413 days ago

            I guess more generally it is a hierarchical delusion, since it’s hierarchy that demands purpose from it’s subordinates, capitalism is just the specific hierarchy at play here.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        712 days ago

        That is not a justification for their abuse and subjugation. You wouldn’t make that argument about an enslaved race of humans.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Horses are not human. They are entirely different beings from us which require our understanding and not just our empathy, if you imagine yourself living like a horse then you’ve failed the assignment.

          I said they were probably happy having humans feed them, cloth them, clean up their shit, mani/pedi, brush them, and let them run around big open fields. That is justification.

          Horses that Humans created are symbiotic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          412 days ago

          imagine someone killing a whole neighborhood and enslaving the survivors and when the resistance says “we don’t exist to serve you” they replied “um actually you’d be dead without us”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              point missed, metaphors discovered. just don’t overlook the dissonance in the fact that horses being incapable of organizing a resistance is another point against the ethics of enslaving them