Summary

Elon Musk, after spending $21 million backing conservative Brad Schimel in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, amplified election fraud claims following Schimel’s loss to liberal judge Susan Crawford.

Musk boosted a post by Alex Jones featuring Roger Stone, who alleged mail-in vote fraud. Schimel rejected the claims, urging supporters to accept the results.

Musk pivoted to highlighting a voter ID ballot measure, though Wisconsin already requires ID. Critics see his reaction as echoing Trump-era denialism.

Despite GOP pressure, Schimel’s concession stood out for its rare break from MAGA conspiracy rhetoric.

  • Billiam
    link
    fedilink
    231
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Oh look, Conservatives sowing more doubt and mistrust because they can’t handle it when faced with how unpopular they are.

    Quelle surprise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5716 days ago

      Sowing like planting seeds not sewing like creating a garment

      But now that I think about it they both kinda work… sewing the threads of lies.

      • Bone
        link
        fedilink
        1216 days ago

        Instead of a seamstress, we’ve got a memestress.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 days ago

            Yes I’m familiar with the German word Quelle. All bottled carbonated water in Germany seems to come from one Quelle or another.

            I’m thinking they were going for the English word “quell”?

            quell /kwĕl/

            transitive verb

            1. To put down forcibly; suppress.

              “Police quelled the riot.”

            2. To pacify; quiet.

              “finally quelled the children’s fears.”

            3. To take the life of; to kill. 
              Similar: kill

      • Billiam
        link
        fedilink
        2716 days ago

        You know, I looked at that and knew it looked wrong but brain couldn’t figure out why.

        Thanks!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Perhaps some leading election deniers are motivated by a psychological defense mechanism, but I think that many realize the strategic benefit. The members of the public who are convinced that Democrats steal elections will vote Republican. They’ll also be more willing to accept a Republican refusing to leave office after losing an election, if things come to that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1016 days ago

        Anyone voting Republican after 2017 is a lost cause. No matter what happens they are voting R. Save your breath and sympathy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          I disagree. While I will never forgive those voters, I don’t think most of them are lost causes. They’ve been manipulated by the largest, most well-funded misinformation and propaganda campaign ever waged against the American people.

          Exercising even the smallest amount of critical thinking skills protects oneself against most of it, but no one is completely immune to misinformation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            215 days ago

            Sure buddy I’m sum it up for you. “Two Trump Elections.” But keep turning the other cheek. This time Lucy won’t pull the football. She promised. 🙄

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          315 days ago

          Anyone who still supports HitlerPig is as much a traitor and Nazi as he is. If you don’t like hearing that, atop being a traitor and a Nazi.

  • Yerbouti
    link
    fedilink
    916 days ago

    At this point, I don’t see how we can ever trust conservative again. They kept showing they won’t play by any rules, they are willing to lie, cheat and manipulate to get what they want. The left needs to radicalize his actions, you cannot negotiate with cheaters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      215 days ago

      JFC, Conservatives have NEVER played by the rules others made. The central tenet of Conservative is that there is an in group (Conservatives) which the law protects but does not bind and an out group which the law binds but does not protect.

  • Wren
    link
    fedilink
    1615 days ago

    I guess maybe? Since technically, he did buy it, right? But this is sort of like calling the cops because someone stole your heroin, isn’t it??

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    915 days ago

    3…2…1… wooowww, is he REALLY saying that? I am SO surprised and I really NEVAH expected this to happen! Oh my God, did this really happen?

    Nah, of course not

    We all knew immediately after her win that this was the next step. First try to cheat, if that doesn’t work, lie about the other cheating to get what you want.

    Elmo is a mysigenic sociopathic narcissist sho actively destroys and ends lives.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    114 days ago

    All GOP elections “were stolen” when suffering such a loss… I would be embarrassed too, if I spent that “random winning money” the GOP voters were gifted and STILL were defeated by a LANDSLIDE! 😂 Drumpf is def cry texting his “friends” about it! Lmao!?

    Damn, Epstein is dead… guess we don’t know who he was “texting” lmao!!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7716 days ago

    Musk boosted a post by Alex Jones featuring Roger Stone

    It’s like a who’s who of absolutely garbage people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    215 days ago

    He and Trump and GOP aren’t petty there. They inject more distrust about the whole idea of voting. Rich people and corporation can lobby, but they still can’t directly buy an election or a cabinet seat in the open. They spend a lot to push up some candidate after ensuring their loyalty, and it seems suboptimal to them. There is a golden moment where you probably can game the system to make max profits and then grab the bag and run. Because democracies are at least stable, and when they roll into dictatorships, you stop playing solitaire, it’s now blackjack and you are walking a thin line between bankruptcy and being shot dead by a firing squad, because your elected politician has too much power to be securely bought.

    I feel like it’s disproportionally favors developing startups\companies\scams who need some boost to start to break even, or old blood that can tolerate some pain if they may consume every other actor on the scene.

    There are benefactors to that, and they are the worst people on the market who would only accelerate the collapse for their short term gains.