• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    424 days ago

    The trump regime was designed to TANK the US economy so that stocks, businesses, and industries can be bought by billionaires at rock bottom prices.

    All is going according to plan.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    024 days ago

    I had this thought the other day and this seems as good a place to leave it as any. Trump seems to be running the economy like it is a simplified version of the 1980s. Like the macho, bold, no compromise leadership style we would have expected from a white collar “hero” of that time period. As if that’s when he learned what a leader looks and acts like and never changed his mind. Absolutely no consideration for evolving culture or the infinitely more complex, interconnected world we live in. Let alone the complexity of the stock market, global trade, and US consumer economy.

    Just oversimplified notions like, “We have to tear it down to rebuild it! You don’t have the balls to do something like that! I’m leader!”

    Though, more likely he’s just dementia riddled and controlled by a foreign government and too dumb to realize any of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    It also forces farmers to sell more of their products here in the U.S., to bring grocery prices way down. We’ve already seen this with eggs.

    The absolutely stupid thing about this particular statement is that egg imports had risen to meet demand which was forcing egg prices back down. The tariffs are going to completely reverse that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2425 days ago

      Also, plus, too we’re doing next to nothing about Bird Flu that’s killing the egg laying chickens and causing the shortage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Also we don’t have any day laborers to plant and pick our crops this year beacuse they are all too scared/deported for the US to produce enough food for ourselves.

        • fantoozie
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 days ago

          Lol fuck America depending on day laborers to subsidize low grocery prices. Time for all you citizens to get off your ass and head to the fields

            • fantoozie
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 days ago

              Is that really your argument? If farms just increased their labor costs by 300-500%, we could all just be happily employed farmhands?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                123 days ago

                Yes. People are willing to do all kinds of tasks for money. If nobody wants to do a job it’s because you aren’t paying enough.

                • fantoozie
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  123 days ago

                  Well I suppose the future will prove one of us wrong

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    What I find most fascinating/hilarous about this is “leftists” up in arms about this. This is like the most far left thing you can do other than actually seizing the means of production.

    I am not exactly a leftist but I find the tariffs wonderful. Consumerism is a pox on the nation, this should fix this.

    Why are we opposed to exploitation and pollution here at home but are ok when China does it because it allows us to buy a year’s worth of clothes every week for the price of single ethically produced garment??

    Over leveraged billionaires are in trouble, BIGLY. If this continues they will be margin called and forced to start selling their shit. Of course the flip side is that liquid billionaires will come out of this richer than before. Probably the real plan behind this.

    Also can we talk about how much of the economy was just fantasy? Billions, even maybe trillions of dollars of our economy is simply speculative value backed by mass delusion.

    Turns out Trump may be a tankie after all.

    The one problem is that it will not yield results within 4 years, so it will cause a whole lot of pain only for whoever is in power next to reverse it as soon as they take office. Hell this might not last till the end of the week for all we know.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 days ago

        I think it’s the one thing everyone can agree on.

        But you have to be aware that it depends greatly on your point of view of how economies should work. Do the dynamics of economics exist simply to push up the GDP or do they exist to create abundance and prosperity that everyone can take part off? The current economic system as it works simply exists to push up the GDP increasingly through financial alchemy, speculative assets and debt. Neoliberals will hold that this is good, but I’m not convinced because my eyes and ears tell me different. This is not a sustainable economic system, even if it looks good on the surface. Or more specifically it is not a sustainable economic system for the middle class. It is schrodingers economy in a way, good and bad existing in superposition.

        This is why China keeps gaining ground, they plan for the long term and have high tolerance for short term pain. Their corporations don’t sweat a bad year, look at Huawei for example. An American company I think would rather sell of its assets and give every exec a gajillion dollars before going though the trouble of rebuilding themselves from being banned from one of their largest markets. Our corps only plan on a quarter by quarter basis, our government on 4 year terms, and entire organizations change plans on a bad day at the stock market. It’s frankly ridiculous how short sighted we’ve become, and our economy really is emblematic of that short sightedness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3025 days ago

      I think, for ‘lefties,’ the trouble is that Trump is replacing progressive income tax with regressive consumption tax. Not that US tax structure was particularly progressive, but it at least pretended. Now, the low end of the income scale, living paycheck-to-paycheck, spending everything on goods & services it going to have to spend an extra 15%, straight to federal coffers, ,while corps get a 25% tax cut and billionaires get elimination of the estate tax.

      It’s schadenfreude to see billionaires lose 10 or 20% of their wealth, but they still own all the factories. They’re still going to make money, and they will make up for production reductions by reducing workforce and eliminating 100% of many worker incomes. That is why all the economists are crying recession: consumption taxes reduce consumption, reduced consumption reduces employment, unemployment reduces consumption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 days ago

        Right, that was a point I made in there somewhere. That the reality is that this will make billionaires more money which tracks with Trump. But even if that were somehow addressed the last part would still happen, it is a feature not a bug. The economic depression is necessary to burst all bubbles, and we have a lot of them, which in turn will make domestic production cheap enough that it is actually feasible. It does require the absolute implosion of markets and the destruction of all speculative wealth that exists in the system. The middle class will be the one to take the hardest hit in fact, not only because they will lose the value of their spending money, and their good paying jobs, but their retirement funds will be in tatters. Buuut if you see it through, at the end of the depression we should have a better functioning economy than what we have now. The problem is Trump simply does not have the spine nor the time to see it through and people really hate sacrificing the short term for an uncertain long term that doesn’t necessarily benefit them directly.

        Anyways I think I rambled but I think the tariffs are actually a good very long term play if you are willing to cause a lot of shock and pain in the short term. We just don’t have the stomach for it, so maybe the artificially inflated economy is better. At least until the balloon pops anyways and we have no other choice but to suffer through the same depression but it is easier to stomach because there’s literally no other choice.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          525 days ago

          I mean, if you’re starting from the view that we have too many poor people for the number of billionaires, then killing off a bunch of plebs in a massive economic depression is definitely one way to balance the field. Just seems a little psychopathic to me, is all.

          It’s definitely a MAGA theme, though: let bird flu run wild and all the survivors will be immune; crash the economy and all the survivors will be better off; throw out all the immigrants and every that remains will be comfortably English-speaking; jail all the protesters and everyone that remains will agree.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            125 days ago

            Funny enough, “Eliminate all competition” is what will turn a capitalist society into a dystopia. The free market isn’t so free when all the competition is gone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          825 days ago

          Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think i get the sentiment of what you’re saying. Tariffs can be good to bolster local production, and thus, local workers under the assumsion that businesses doing well is good for workers (I’m not convinced it is, at least I don’t think it’ s what’s best for workers. But let’s work within the limitations of the capitalist system here.

          The problem is how USA is doing it right now. If you give a 10 year warning before implementing tariffs, while also allocating money to support growing the needed industry, you make sure the industry has time to adapt and make the necessary changes to accomodate the needed growth in production and educating the workforce.

          None of that is happening. In fact, while putting in the tariffs, the workers’s jobs are threatened with an economic collaps. The outcome in this scenario is survival of the rich, who will survive a 99% loss in wealth and income just fine. While the most vulnerable, the working class and those even more vulnerable like the sick or handicapped, are asked to simply live with it, and hope to god they may some day be able to afford what they used to. Meanwhile the richest will keep buying all that the working class are forced to sell off, just to survive.

          Tariffs aren’t necessarily bad, but in this implementation they’re absolutely catastrophic to the working class, and a sale to the oligarchs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 days ago

            Right, that’s sort of what I meant but I always try to be a little more provocative because otherwise there’s no discussion. Tariffs are a good idea if you use them right, and plan on how they will be used strategically. I would still do it in a similar way that Trump did it, meaning it would apply to all countries but especially for those that keep wages low through exploitation and pollution, in such a way that the average cost of production in those countries for all major exports is the same as domestic production.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      524 days ago

      Consumerism is a pox on the nation, this should fix this.

      Leftism is when you fix consumerism by rendering common people too poor to buy shit. What a take.

      Why are we opposed to exploitation and pollution here at home but are ok when China does it because it allows us to buy a year’s worth of clothes every week for the price of single ethically produced garment??

      Well, first off, these tariffs aren’t focused on China. They’re hitting everyone, including countries with better labor laws and more environmental regulation than the US, such as the EU. Second, the tariffs aren’t conditional on countries making improvements, like if you want to argue we should have tariffs based on emissions per capita, that’s not an unreasonable position (although we’d have to tariff ourselves somehow), but that’s not what’s actually happening at all.

      Turns out Trump may be a tankie after all.

      No, he isn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Not too poor to buy things, only poor enough that you’ll consider it twice before buying another plastic piece of shit you don’t need off of Amazon. It’s absolutely messed up that the ONLY reason we can consume as we do is because we moved all the pollution and exploitation to where we can’t see it, so that we can consume with a clean conscience. I don’t know how you can defend this shit, because I can’t. If your country’s economy depends on the exploitation of the people of another’s that just colonialism disguised as free market trade.

        China was an example because it’s the most well known one. Second I never said that the implementation was good itself, I just think the concept of universal tariffs is very much solid especially in terms of ethics (which Trump somewhat frames it that way, of course his intentions are both bad and not well thought out so it’s only superficial ) with the caveat that it results in short term destruction of wealth which depending on the point of view is not so bad. I at least don’t think the levels of speculation in our markets is good and anything that pops that bubble is a good thing.

        • OBJECTION!
          link
          fedilink
          123 days ago

          I don’t know how you can defend this shit, because I can’t.

          I’m not. Just because I don’t like Trump’s policies or approach doesn’t mean I’m supporting the status quo. They’re both bad.

          I just think the concept of universal tariffs is very much solid especially in terms of ethics

          Why should we place tariffs on countries with better labor laws where things are more ethically produced?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    199
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Fret not, says the president, he is apparently playing chess while the world is playing checkers

    He’s trying to treat the entire country like one of the casinos he bankrupted to screw over his creditors.

    I’m sure he thinks he’s playing chess. But what he’s really doing is sitting in the corner eating the pieces.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      825 days ago

      NFL has it coming. They denied him once and he may or may not never forget.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7725 days ago

      A vivid and possibly accurate description.

      I still think he is planted there to do as much damage as possible before he expires. Which would mean he is doing it all on purpose… Which then again would have to make him smarter than I give him credit for

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1325 days ago

        Or he’s betting that if people get desperate enough they will allow an absolute dictatorship.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2725 days ago

          Or he’s betting that if people get desperate enough they will allow an absolute dictatorship.

          • He is setting tariffs on his own, a power designated solely to Congress by the Constitution.

          • He is having masked police kidnap people off the streets without warrants and shipping them to an overseas gulag without trial or even charges.

          • He is illegally refusing to distribute money allocated by Congress to certain states in order to punish them for not doing his bidding.

          • And when the courts have ordered him to stop doing the above, he has willfully ignored those court orders with no repercussions.

          Exactly what more needs to happen for this to be a dictatorship?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            625 days ago

            Suspending elections.

            We have never missed an election in nearly 250 years of existence, even during the Civil War. If he does that, then America no longer exists, and we have no obligation to pay taxes, respect the laws, pay our debts, etc., and most especially acknowledge the government.

            It is every man for himself.

            • OBJECTION!
              link
              fedilink
              124 days ago

              You might as well be waiting for someone to go on TV and look directly at the camera and say, “I am a dictator” (which Trump even kinda did). We’re always going to have elections because they’re a valuable tool of controlling the population. Nearly every country in the world has them, including ones that are generally considered dictatorships.

              Without elections, the only vehicle of change or expressions of popular will would be actions, and those actions are generally more disruptive and effective than voting is. We didn’t always have elections in the first place, and we didn’t vote our way out of monarchy.

              With elections, people put their anger on hold for years, waiting for the appropriate time to express it, and the way it’s expressed is by choosing a different corporate lackey to support. Gerrymandering, corporate finance, a compromised press, etc ensure that will be the case. Even better, they get people forming their whole political identity around their preferred corporate lackey and half the population hating the other half for it, making organizing on a large scale extremely difficult.

              It’s a very silly place to draw a red line. Even if it happened, you’d still “have to” pay taxes for the same reason you do now, because of force. What, are you paying taxes and following laws and shit right now because you think the US government represents some kind of moral authority?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1325 days ago

            Firing judges who resist him

            Dissolution of Congress

            Deployment of military on US soil to control citizens.

            Alteration or abandonment of the Constitution.

            You’re right we are definitely on the spectrum of dictatorship, but it can get much much worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        525 days ago

        Even Space Nazi’s “unwoke” AI Grok says Krasnov is a Russian agent with over 80% certainty.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2025 days ago

        Yeah I agree. There has to be a bigger plan than this. In 40 years our children will see documentaties about the republicans pulling the biggest power grab ever and using idiots like Trump to actieve it. It’s not Trump playing chess here, he’s just a pawn. There are people behind the scènes pulling the strings.

        If what currently is happening is really just throwing tantrums without having a plan then I feel sorry for how dumb most of america had become.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            725 days ago

            I think this is more from Silicon Valley, destroy the country to make way for the Butterfly Revolution and corporate city states with CEO kings at the top. If we don’t stop it we’ll be in a techno feudalist dystopia

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              625 days ago

              “Adam something” did a great video on it. The Trump presidency is marked by fascism, incompetence and technocrats. It’s multipronged

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          In 40 years our children will see documentaties about the republicans pulling the biggest power grab ever and using idiots like Trump to actieve it.

          It’s optimistic that they’ll even have documentaries to watch (and that they’d be historically accurate and truthful).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        925 days ago

        Could be both planted and so inept that he believes he got there on his own accord and is doing a great job.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    125 days ago

    Trump right now is a literal amalgam of Pelosi, Bernie Sanders and Obama. Dude is a Democrat from 1988-2008 lmao 🤣

    • FancyLad
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      You win the award for being the dumbest fucking Lemmy user. Congratulations!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      325 days ago

      Bro, what kind of crack are you smoking, you sound like you were a Bernie bro who voted for Trump so you can fuck offnow

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      This is the dumbest political take I’ve ever seen, and my dad called Trump a communist because he had Cold War brainrot

      What are you even talking about, why would you ever think a pack of neoliberals don’t love the stonks, and why would you ever include Sanders in them? I can only assume you don’t even know he’s not a Democrat.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        125 days ago

        Lmao, Pelosi Bernie and even Obama spoke in favor of tariffs during the time a lot.

        You thought you were cooked?

        Bro you were only marinating

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          625 days ago

          Yeah because a tax on tires alone is comparable to universal tariffs on basically everyone but Russia

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      325 days ago

      Republican doing Republican policy Republicanly is

      a. A Republican

      b. A Democrat

      c. A Russian

      Shockingly few people can answer this question correctly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Part of a collectivist dream. Companies losing billions of dollars in a day, and self inflicted to boot.

    Or what, you gonna cry over unrealized gains and imaginary money?

    Beyond that, trump has talked about putting up tariffs since years ago. Hell I remember even Pelosi, Bernie and Biden did as well. So yeah this is just another negotiation chip.

    Buckle up bois

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1725 days ago

      Part of a collectivist dream. Companies losing billions of dollars in a day, and self inflicted to boot.

      Or what, you gonna cry over unrealized gains and imaginary money?

      You do realize that it’s regular people who are going to suffer, right?

  • ugtug
    link
    fedilink
    3225 days ago

    Republicans are such idiots that they would mistake huffing paint as a sign of genius.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5225 days ago

    “The president isn’t a number-crunching guy, per se, but President Trump strongly demanded big numbers that would make other countries treat us fairly. And I think you can see today that those numbers are huge,”

    HAHAHAHA

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3425 days ago

    GOP presidents do this every time. Crash the market and the oligarchs buy it up for pennis on the dollar.

  • The Real King Gordon
    link
    fedilink
    7025 days ago

    The Narcissist’s Prayer

    That didn’t happen.
    And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
    And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
    And if it is, that’s not my fault.
    And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
    And if I did, you deserved it.