• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Does flash, like solid state drives, have the same lifespan in terms of write? If so, it feels like this would most certainly not be useful for AI, as that use case would involve doing billions/trillions of writes in a very short span of time.

    Edit: It looks like they do: https://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/hardware/life-expectancy-of-a-drive/

    Manufacturers say to expect flash drives to last about 10 years based on average use. But life expectancy can be cut short by defects in the manufacturing process, the quality of the materials used, and how the drive connects to the device, leading to wide variations. Depending on the manufacturing quality, flash memory can withstand between 10,000 and a million [program/erase] cycles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For AI processing, I don’t think it would make much difference if it lasted longer. I could be wrong, but afaik, running the actual transformer for AI is done in VRAM, and staging and preprocessing is done in RAM. Anything else wouldn’t really make sense speed and bandwidth wise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Oh I agree, but the speeds in the article are much faster than any current volatile memory. So it could theoretically be used to vastly expand memory availability for accelerators/TPUs/etc for their onboard memory.

        I guess if they can replicate these speeds in volatile memory and increase the buses to handle it, then they’d be really onto something here for numerous use cases.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    193 months ago

    You just fucking wait. Trump is bringing manufacturing to the US. And when that plant opens someday you’ll be so sorry you doubted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        I talked to like 50 people today and all of the people said they were starting manufacturing plants tomorrow and they’ll be fully functional Tuesday around 3:15.

        I started mine earlier and I’ve already done manufacturing 3 times today. It’s really easy. By this time tomorrow I’ll have a couple more and they’ll all be winning manufacturing.

        Tariffs gave me the ability to finally believe in myself. Tariffs have increased my stamina in bed, given me a full head of hair again, and since I started manufacturing plant yesterday I’ve dropped 50 pounds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    173 months ago

    Yeah… At best click baity as fuck, at worst a complete scam.

    Any time there is a 10x or more in a headline you are 10x or more likely to be right by calling it BS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Why? If they looked at how current tech works then they could easily develop the same tech 10000x faster

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      No? Oh, that’s a shame. I was hoping for some improvement in the world, but a random person on the internet said it wasn’t possible without giving any reasons at all. Oh well.

      • Kairos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        No it’s literally impossible without bypassing the speed of light and/or the size of atoms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      Seriously, for me a “China scientist” is someone doing research on China, like a space scientist would do research on astronomy and similar. But I’m not a native English speaker, so, idk

      • Jesus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Someone doing research on China is a chiologist.

        Same as someone doing research on biology is a biologist.

        • hazel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Biology -> biolog -> biologist

          China -> chin -> chinist?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      Probably because is an ethnicity and nationality. There are ethnic Chinese people all over the world and a few countries and regions are made of a majority of ethnic Chinese but are not related to China. Calling them the same thing is playing into the PRC’s “all ethnic Chinese pledge their allegiance to China” nonsense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          The reverse, however, isn’t true. It may be somewhat understandable but not entirely reasonable to assume someone who is Chinese is from China which is what I’m trying to say.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Perhaps but I haven’t encountered that myself. I’m ethnic Chinese that’s a citizen of another ethnic Chinese majority nation so I’ve encountered this specific type a lot more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      153 months ago

      I think it’s a slightly different connotation. “China scientists” infers scientists residing in China while not presuming their ethnicity, while “Chinese scientists” implies their ethnicity but not their location.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        You literally never hear “America scientists” even if some of them might be from another country. Same with every single other country I can think of, except China.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      Real talk, why is discussion around people and subjects in China so fucking weird?

      If it’s not referring to the entire population when it only applies to the government or a subset of them as a global “the Chinese” or doing silly shit like “China scientists” everyone’s grammatical skills suddenly tank when even broaching a topic even tangential to the PRC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Note that this in theory speaks to performance of a non volatile memory. It does not speak to cost.

      We already have a faster than NAND non volatile storage in phase change memory . It failed due to expense.

      If this thing is significantly more expensive even than RAM, then it may fail even if it is everything it says it is. If it is at least as cheap as ram, it’ll be huge since it is faster than RAM and non volatile.

      Swap is indicated by cost, not by non volatile characteristics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 months ago

    Wow, finally graphene has been cracked. Exciting times for portable low-energy computing

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This article appeared in my feed just above another article about how China has the world’s first operational thorium reactor. Meanwhile, the US is about to fight a civil war over whether vaccination causes measles and stripping away the last of our social programs in order to get our wealthiest people another 2% subsidy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      293 months ago

      China and Russia worked very hard to get these rich stupid people in power.

      It really started in 2016 when US security agencies released a joint report showing Russia was spreading misinformation to help Trump win the election.

      Surprisingly, the “liberal tears compilations” and “something about an email server people didn’t understand wasn’t actually illegal” actually worked and drowned out the warnings from our security agencies.

      I don’t think China will be any better of a world leader tbh.

      I see humanity’s future as a boot stepping on a human face forever, unless humanity globally rejects kings, oligarchs, and dictators.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 months ago

        Don’t forget the genius DNC folk, including HRC thought a pied piper strategy of boosting the circus peanut was a good idea.

        If the Russians and Chinese did anything it was just capitalizing on an unforced error by the hubris of the centrist. One again, bernie would have won, but that was more distasteful to the ruling class than fascism.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Oddly, the DNC’s position on the republican candidate in the circus that was the 2016 primary wasn’t likely all that influential or determinative.

          trump figured out that running a political campaign as entertainment and leveraging the power of, well, just lying about everything was possible in the modern media environment. republicans had been working for decades on tilling the ground for an authoritarian that they could manage, but got themselves owned instead. Oops.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You rely on professional fabricators of misinformation to tell you the truth about who is producing misinformation? Don’t fall for crude propaganda. When empires end they do some self-destructive things. It’s normal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        It really started in 2016 when US security agencies released a joint report showing Russia was spreading misinformation to help Trump win the election.

        Compare russia to the British and consider who is the bigger villain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Can we not bother deciding who was the biggest nightmare, and instead focus on finding models for the best countries.

          I am so sick of the “at least the USSR had…” or “at least China does…” conversation. Can’t we have a “Finland has high happiness, broad socialist protections, and a fast moving economy” kind of conversations.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            But that would be productive and worthwhile, to talk about actual policy or PISA findings or how to move forward to make the world a better place! Wouldn’t you rather bicker about old enmities in the context of nationalism?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            The point is that foreigners influence elections all the time, all over the world.

            Americans meddle all the time, but are the only one that start crying when it’s done to them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              Americans have a history of the most insidious manipulations in the politics of other nations - did you see their Sec. of state try commemorate the CIA backed coup of Cuba.

              About “crying” over foreign interference, you are wrong. In the last 4 years France, Canada, Germany, Romania, Sri-Lanka, Australia, all of the Baltic nations andore have a had credible complaints of attempts from foreign nations trying to use propaganda and more to influence elections.

              Let’s not try to convince ourselves than only the Americans are misbehaving.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Not my future, I will try to die in a way that even an omnipotent AI can’t bring back.

        • Derpgon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Gonna make sure to bring as many of those fuckers with me as possible.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    903 months ago

    By tuning the “Gaussian length” of the channel, the team achieved two‑dimensional super‑injection, which is an effectively limitless charge surge into the storage layer that bypasses the classical injection bottleneck.

    • Jolteon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      Speaking of, did you hear there’s a new room temperature super conductor?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    This sounds like that material would be more useful in high performance radars, not as flash memory

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It‘s likely BS anyway. Maybe it’s just me but reading about another crazy breakthrough from China every single day during this trade war smells fishy. Because I‘ve seen the exact same propaganda strategy during the pandemic when relations between China and the rest of the world weren‘t exactly the best. A lot of those headlines coming from there are just claims about flashy topics with very little substance or second guessing. And the papers releasing the stories aren‘t exactly the most renowned either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        It’s definitely possible they’re amplifying these developments to maintain confidence in the Chinese market, but I doubt they’re outright lying about the discoveries. I think it’s also likely that some of what they’ve been talking about has been in development for a while and that China is choosing now to make big reveals about them.