• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    the most interesting part to me is that nowhere along the line did anyone mention just how interesting it all is. you know the real bad shit has started when the press shuts up and universities bend over and one of the richest people in the fucking world has to re-think his pricing displays because it pissed off the King.

    edit to add - he put a fucking tax on british tea without congress. that’s a taxation without representation. on british fucking tea.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 months ago

    I suppose once you’re responsible for hundreds to thousands of innocent people’s deaths, one more kinda fades into the background without much further effect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    Well shit, that doctor who phrase about the human super power of forgetting rings even true day by day

  • obscureprodigy
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    or y’know, they didn’t

    edit: yeah downvote me because you’re a conspiracy theorist lmao

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      382 months ago

      honestly, you’re not being downvoted for your opinion. you’re being downvoted because you’re just being contrarian without providing anything at all to substantiate your stance. you might have well just wrote “lol” or something else just as asinine. no offense, of course

      • Bunnylux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Lol what? There’s no evidence this happened. It’s up to the conspiracy theorists to provide evidence, which they never do. You cant just be like, prove that DIDNT happen!! Like hello? Has this entire comment thread lost its collective mind? Does truth and evidence mean nothing?

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          102 months ago

          A guy who specifically stated he wasn’t suicidal and had no plans to end his life shot himself in the back of the head outside the comfort of his home a day or two before he was supposed to testify about Boeing putting scrap parts in their planes.

          Lol ok

      • obscureprodigy
        link
        fedilink
        72 months ago

        i really don’t think so. that’s not how downvoting works and you know that lmao. i made people mega mad because i don’t believe Boeing murdered a guy, like cut the shit. you can read his suicide note and see his handwriting and his thoughts. i didn’t think to post that??? i thought contributing skepticism was at least an acceptable comment but excuse me for breaking some weird internet etiquette.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          i’m not surprised, but you’re missing my point. that said, you accidentally provided what i was talking about. don’t judge the community on your first comment - judge them on how well this one shakes out.

          edit - to quote [email protected]:

          i really don’t think so. that’s not how downvoting works and you know that lmao. i made people mega mad because i don’t believe Boeing murdered a guy, like cut the shit. you can read his suicide note and see his handwriting and his thoughts. i didn’t think to post that??? i thought contributing skepticism was at least an acceptable comment but excuse me for breaking some weird internet etiquette.

          (btw i upvote all your comments strictly so that other people can see how much of an ass you are)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Edith: didn’t know about the murder. That changes it.

    Murder and execution is not the same as gross neglicence. It was Missmanagement and cost optimization (if you can call this that) and a fuck you attitude. and it’s bad. It’s horrible and people should go to jail and definitely to court. But murder? No.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      Pretty sure it’s referencing John Barnett who allegedly shot himself in his truck while he was engaged in active litigation against Boeing. It ain’t about the doors, it’s about their whistleblowers no longer being around to testify.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Uh that is bad. Didn’t even know about that. Didn’t make the news im europe at least for me.

  • Bunnylux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 months ago

    So what now we like conspiracy theories when they suit us?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      632 months ago

      Chat,

      Did the Boeing whistleblower who deliberately told his family and friends that he wasn’t suicidal commit suicide?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Do Boeings actions help deter future whistle-blowers? Yes.

          Finding the correct label seems irrelevant.

          • Bunnylux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            It is absolutely, and I cannot state this enough, NOT irrelevant. Truth fucking matters.

      • Bunnylux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 months ago

        Do you actually know anyone suicidal? They usually don’t tell people. They often don’t know themselves. They changed their mind. They’re depressed. They’re anxious. They’re not well. They die suddenly. Everyone is surprised. That is how it goes.

          • Bunnylux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 months ago

            How did “one family friend named Jennifer who can’t believe it” turn into “all his family and friends”

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          232 months ago

          How often do suicidal people reach out to a bunch of their friends and family just to specifically tell them they are NOT going to commit suicide?

          • Bunnylux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            That didn’t happen. One grieving family friend said that he said that. John Oliver would have a field day with you people lol. Boeing has hurt and killed a lot of people. They do this like corporations do - by cutting staff, evading regulation, buying politicians. Boeing is liable for great harm. But focusing on these conspiracies rather than getting to the root of the problem – that capitalism enables great harm by eroding our society – isn’t helping.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              14
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              So Corporations will break any law for profit besides murder?

              I trust the guy’s family more than the police lol, so do most people

              You’re really bending over backwards to push this narrative.

              • Bunnylux
                link
                fedilink
                English
                62 months ago

                What “narrative”? It’s on the Wikipedia page. It’s not a narrative, it’s what happened. Like… I really don’t care that much about this specific case. It’s more about the principle, the erosion of truth, the meaninglessness of facts. It’s honestly the same type of thinking that makes right wing conspiracists and I don’t want to capitulate to it. Focusing on a a salacious and improbable event downplays the real “evils” of capitalism, the smaller but cumulative things: the selfishness, the greed of everyday people and how profit motivated corporations enhance and multiply that. Contrapoints (Natalie Wynn) just did a fantastic video on conspiracies that touches on all three points. I would recommend it to anyone.

                • Refurbished Refurbisher
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 months ago

                  Focusing on a a salacious and improbable event downplays the real “evils” of capitalism

                  That’s the thing. These events are not just “salacious and improbable”. These events are actually happening in front of our eyes and they need to be taken seriously. These events are happening as a direct result of capitalism, and not calling it out will just allow the right to set the narrative on those issues.

            • Refurbished Refurbisher
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              These conspiracies come as a direct result of capitalism. Everybody can plainly see when Boeing murders whistleblowers that it is because of money/their image.

              Failure to talk about these conspiracies is a failure to point out the specific failures of capitalism.

              Also I assume you actually meant conspiracy and not conspiracy theory.

          • Bunnylux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Literally all the time. Are you some sort of suicide expert?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        Suicidal people lie about being suicidal.

        That’s like the first thing you learn Suicide Awareness.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          92 months ago

          Do suicidal people reach out to their freinds and family to specifically tell them they aren’t going to commit suicide and nothing else?

          You’re not going to be able to push your narrative here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            102 months ago

            Suicidal people lie about being suicidal. And yes, they do reach out to friends and family.

            It’s also important to note here, John Barnett was not giving any sort of testimony that could harm Boeing. That’s not what the trial was over,

            No, the trial, or rather the appeal, was over Boeing’s retaliation against John Barnett for his past whistleblowing. Whistleblowing that resulted in Boeing receiving a fine.

            That particular case was done and over. John Barnett had nothing more to add.

            John Barnett sued Boeing for the wrongful termination, and other retaliation including Blackballing him (talking to other Aerospace companies to make sure they wouldn’t hire him), John lost the court case to Boeing’s high priced lawyers.

            John then appealed, and gave testimony in court in front of the appeals judge.

            I don’t know if you’ve ever been at a low point like that. Where you think you’ve hit rock bottom, and you hinge your hopes on just one thing going right, only for it to go horribly wrong.

            I’ve been to that false rock bottom, and found the depths hidden below it.

            Boeing didn’t need to hire some contract killer to pull the trigger.

            John Barnett was fighting his wrongful termination for seven years. That’s how Boeing got John to pull the trigger. They drove him to suicide, didn’t need to go any further.

            That’s what you conspiracy nuts miss. Boeing ruined a man’s life, and that’s the part that you’re ignoring. Or maybe you heard someone rightfully say that Boeing killed a man, and you thought it was meant literally.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      So what now we like conspiracy theories when they suit us?

      No shit, Sherlock. Always have. How does this surprise you?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    132 months ago

    A lot of new .world users showing up with ChatGPT responses about how this was a conspiracy

    Reminds me of the Epstein thing. It could be AI. But people do love their conspiracy theories, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Unless there’s actual evidence that it’s AI, I think this is an absolutely absurd assumption to make.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    502 months ago

    There was a police investigation.

    They just didn’t investigate Boeing about it because the police investigation determined they weren’t involved.

    If you truly believe there should be investigations, you have to accept when the results of the investigations don’t match your expectations. That’s why we have investigations.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      522 months ago

      The military industrial company a person was whistleblowing against wasn’t investigated in the mysterious death of that person.

      Yeah that’s called not doing a proper investigation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        342 months ago

        I need to step in here with a major correction, John Barnett was not Whistleblowing. That’s not what the court case was about at all.

        No, the court case was for the wrongful termination, which was a result of his whistleblowing.

        This is an important distinction, because the whistleblowing was done. John Barnett had nothing more to offer authorities, because he had already turned over all the evidence he collected. That particular case was a done deal years ago.

        John Barnett then sued Boeing over his wrongful termination, and some apparent black balling. (i.e. retaliatory rumormongering to prevent John from working in aerospace).

        John lost the lawsuit. He then appealed that decision, and it wasn’t going well.

        This is the situation that led to his suicide. Boeing 100% drove a man to kill himself. But no, they didn’t fucking hire some guy to go kill John Barnett, that would be fucking stupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 months ago

          no, they didn’t fucking hire some guy to go kill John Barnett, that would be fucking stupid.

          The possibity will certainly frighten future whistle-blowers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            172 months ago

            No.

            What disincentivizes future whistleblowing is the prospect of never being able to work in your field ever again, because your boss, or rather his boss, talked to his counterpart at the other aerospace companies, so now no one will hire you.

            You then drown in debt, and die penniless on the street, years or decades later. Depending on your luck.

            Simply killing someone is messy. You might get caught. Ruining a man’s life to the point where he kills himself? That’s disturbingly easy.

            Again, the lawsuit was not over John Barnett’s whistleblowing. That case had concluded a few years earlier, with Boeing being found in violation of some safety standards. They got a fine and John Barnett got fired. Except Boeing didn’t “Fire” him, they forced him to retire.

            So John Barnett sues Boeing for wrongful termination, and loses. Boeing has some very expensive lawyers.

            John appeals the loss, and that’s what this court case was about. He was giving testimony about how Boeing retaliated against him. And he obviously thought that he was going to lose again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              What disincentivizes future whistleblowing is the prospect of never being able to work in your field ever again

              That’s is a standard disincentive across US industry.

              Knowing that a company hounded their previous whistle-blowers to death (no matter the method) is and additional disincentive specific to Boeing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If you truly believe there should be investigations, you have to accept when the results of the investigations

      That doesn’t logically follow. It’s like insisting OJ wasn’t guilty of murder, because the criminal case didn’t stick. But he was guilty of “wrongful death” because the civil suit did stick. What kind of conclusion do we draw when the police fumble the bag and private investigators continue to turn up incriminating evidence?

      And even then, you can both have an investigation (even one that turns up culprits) and still have a cover-up.

      There’s even a term for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

      According to Victor Marchetti, a former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a limited hangout is “spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”[

      • Ragdoll X
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Well of course not, they exist to protect and serve!

        Protect and serve...

        … the interests of the pedophilic corporate elite, that is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        If you won’t accept the results of an investigation, then why call for one in the first place. You can do one or the other, but both is dumb. Don’t move the goalposts, just admit that you think X happened and you are now rejecting any evidence you disagree with.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    312 months ago

    who I do remember is Brock Turner, yes that guy… the rapist Brock Turner. who now goes by the name of Allen Turner. that guy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      You mean the pathetic rapist Brock Turner, who now goes by Allen Turner (also a pathetic rapist)?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      Sounds like suicide to me. I feel like Boeing is still largely at fault for bringing him to that point though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I would hope that if I publicly proclaimed, “I have no intent to commit suicide,” before my suicide then people would…

        …at a minimum, state, “Brother that guy proclaimed he had no intent to commit suicide,” every time it was brought up.

        …then ideally that additional scrutiny would be applied at a law enforcement level and the case would be handled with extra scrutiny.

        So lacking the ideal, I’m here to remind you that just before his suicide he proclaimed, “I’m not going to commit suicide.”

        I’m extremely puzzled how this isn’t brought up every time, people need to remember.

        • Pup Biru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          yeah that’s what they said!

          doesn’t look like anything to me