1783 cases, 137 of which with a changed view after interaction.

reddit admin also answering at 15:00

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      1418 days ago

      They didn’t put it by one. They allege that they thought that since there were no studies in the same vein, it therefore ought to be acceptable, conveniently ignoring the fact that a lot of things that hadn’t been experimented on for the first time were later widely decried as things that never should have happened.

      I’d call them weasels, but that would be unfair to actual weasels.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        317 days ago

        Have there been scientific studies on humans being eaten alive by alligators? That alone doesn’t feel like a reason to pursue it.

        • Don Antonio Magino
          link
          fedilink
          417 days ago

          Now you mention it, there haven’t been any studies on what happens when you attempt to send Elon Musk to Mars by catapult. Seems like a worthy and 100% ethical scientific endeavour to me.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 days ago

            Coward should’ve ridden in the car they shot to space.

      • 3DMVR
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        they caused so many butterfly effects, effected hella moods by making them think they were seeing real opinions

    • .Donuts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1718 days ago

      “The researchers argue that psychological manipulation of OPs on this sub is justified because the lack of existing field experiments constitutes an unacceptable gap in the body of knowledge”

      They were just convinced the end justified the means. Ethics be damned, there’s knowledge to pursue

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    137 out of 1783 doesn’t sound conclusive at all.

    ESPECIALLY when you consider that the results are skewed to the point of uselessness by the fact that it’s against the subreddit’s rules to accuse anyone of arguing in bad faith and/or being a bot.

    It’s almost the equivalent of a study concluding that there’s no LGBTQ+ people in Uganda or Russia because they couldn’t get anyone to publicly identify as such in a country where it’s illegal for LGBTQ+ people to exist.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    316 days ago

    How did they verify their bots are talking to humans? Have them solve captcha? You’re running a science experiment on fucking Reddit. GTFO