A photograph of Trump administration official Mike Waltz’s phone shows him using an unofficial version of Signal designed to archive messages during a cabinet meeting.

Mike Waltz, who was until Thursday U.S. National Security Advisor, has inadvertently revealed he is using an obscure and unofficial version of Signal that is designed to archive messages, raising questions about what classification of information officials are discussing on the app and how that data is being secured, 404 Media has found.

On Thursday Reuters published a photograph of Waltz checking his mobile phone during a cabinet meeting held by Donald Trump.

The screen appears to show messages from various top level government officials, including JD Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and Marco Rubio.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Super Secret MAGA Signal Archive App!

    Download MAGASecretsApp.exe at MAGASecretsApp. ru now!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25115 days ago

    The “TM SGNL PIN” message is displayed on an unofficial — and less secure — version of Signal created by a company called TeleMessage, which makes clones of popular messaging apps, but enables the ability to archive messages

    https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-waltz-photographed-using-signal-messaging-app-during-cabinet-meeting-2025-5?op=1

    TeleMessage is an Israeli software company based in Petah Tikva, Israel. Founded in 1999 by Guy Levit and Gil Shapira, it provides secure enterprise messaging, mobile communications archiving and high-volume text messaging services.[1]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TeleMessage

    Let that sink in

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12515 days ago

      Hello foreign intelligence agencies, would you like an easy way to intercept and read classified communications? Maybe just buy it off Mossad? JFC what is this clown show. Why are our intelligence officials even using off the shelf, or even modified, software solutions for communications? Shouldn’t we have some secure messaging app and protocols developed here?

      Am I missing something here or is it really this dumb?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        They are going out of their way to use an Israeli platform to discuss top secret government business on. Seems pretty obvious why. They are taking instructions from Israel Russia!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Isn’t Israel known for its tech firms making phone security bypass tech (I.E. NSO Group and their Pegasus SW?)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1915 days ago

          I mean it’s probably both but I would bet my life that Trump is actually a Russian agent. You don’t grab a whole pile of classified documents and bring them to your home in a location secured worse than the door to a bedroom and not proceed to give those away.

          Now, direct involvement and level of control - idk but he must be “on their payroll” so to speak.

          Who knows they’re a whole den of corruption, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn some of Trump’s staff are selling state secrets.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1315 days ago

            Most of that shit went to Saudi Arabia for the 2 billion paid to Jared Kushner’s company years ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2215 days ago

      I don’t understand, signal is open source, why would they need to purchase an unofficial fork from a foreign company? Isn’t that an huge security issue?

      And what’s the point of using end to end encryption if the app has been hacked to send messages to a remote server anyway

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1915 days ago

        Signal is lacking a certain feature “Archiving messages” . This company used Signal’s open source code to add this feature and offer the whole thing as a “Signal plus” product.

        Assuming best intentions, Waltz wanted Signal but also wanted the ability to archive messages so he opted for the software provided by this company instead of the original.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007321231-Archiving-or-unarchiving-chats

      Am I just being dense or does stock Signal already have this feature?

      You can also export the entirety of your Signal chats and decrypt them on a computer with an open source tool.

      I also thought they were using Signal specifically to avoid FOIA, which requires government officials to archive their messages.

      So it is possible government officials are using disappearing messages in Signal (which is illegal for multiple reasons), which will give a reason to use a third party app, not that this specific app should be trusted in any way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        714 days ago

        My understanding is that Archiving chats would be keeping a copy of these chats accessible elsewhere for archiving purposes and not directly related to the archiving feature you’ve mentioned.

        Signal does support chat backup which is close enough but its encrypted and its complicated to make one (for security reasons) and I am not sure its possible to view the encrypted chats without going through the process of restoring the backup.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1015 days ago

      well that is how you become Israel’s and Russia’s bitch and sell your own country so they don’t reveal the dirt that they found about you

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12615 days ago

    How did this photo even happen? They don’t use privacy covers? Who’s running this operation??

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1315 days ago

    Cunts voted for this. It’s not like we didn’t know they’re this incompetent and dangerous.

      • Fingolfinz
        link
        fedilink
        315 days ago

        They will so make them afraid for being who they are. It’s time they really feel our dissatisfaction with them for subjecting us all to this bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    915 days ago

    Lemme get this straight

    It’s a problem for the government to use signal because all govt correspondence needs to be on record and retrievable in the future

    But it’s also a problem to use archiving of encrypted chats?

    Not an American, can someone explain?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1915 days ago

      Yes.

      The answer is that this is all a bunch of stupid bullshit and that the Trumplicans truly don’t give a damn about laws that no one can force them to follow.

      At this point, there’s really no point in trying to look for consistency or rational justification for anything these people do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        What laws are being broken? If republicans control both houses, why don’t they approve the app or change the law?

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          1215 days ago

          Government communications must be archived.

          The head of each Federal agency shall make and preserve records containing adequate and proper documentation of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, and essential transactions of the agency and designed to furnish the information necessary to protect the legal and financial rights of the Government and of persons directly affected by the agency’s activities. 44 U.S. Code § 3101.

          By using Signal, they’re intentionally breaking the law since Signal doesn’t retain communications. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is they don’t want a record so they can’t be held accountable in the future.

          If republicans control both houses, why don’t they approve the app or change the law?

          The simple answer is that this wouldn’t pass the Senate, because the filibuster still exists (for now) and you need 2/3s vote to end debate and hold a vote (called cloture). It’s unlikely you’d get the 15 or so Dems needed for this to happen.

          The complicated answer is that Congress has been perfectly happy ceding more and more of its authority to the Presidency for a long time now. When you’re elected for a two-year term (as Representatives are) but spend 1+ year campaigning (because seriously, fuck US elections) you don’t want to do anything that even the short-term-memories of American voters might remember. So they’re perfectly happy letting the President take the blame for anything if it’s their party in the White House, or obstructing him if it’s not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            The point they’re trying to make seems to be that the specific unofficial Signal app they are using does archive those messages. So the fact Signal by itself doesn’t, is irrelevant. The government is paying TeleMessage for this Signal app instead of using the official Signal app… The only reason for that would be for the archiving capability.

            I mean… If they’re using Signal specifically because it doesn’t store messages, and they are trying to hide the communications and not archive them… They wouldn’t be using the app capable of archiving them in the first place, they’d just use the official Signal app.

            Not sure why this is hard for people to understand since the article is explaining exactly what this app is and does and how it bypasses the “Signal doesn’t arching texts” issue entirely, because it doesn’t matter what the official Signal app does or doesn’t do.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Everyone gets that. What you don’t seem to get is that when the law says government communications must be archived, it doesn’t mean “an Israeli company has a copy of all my sensitive texts” is how to accomplish that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                114 days ago

                How do you know they have access to the archived data? That’s possible… but requires making assumptions that the application sends the archive data back to the company, which is not a guarantee by any means. Not everything operates via vendor-run infrastructure, most enterprise applications are designed to work with an enterprise-run solution for exactly this type of reason. This isn’t a program aimed at the general public.

                They make the client application, it is entirely possible that the client simply sends that data to a specified database, and the apps on these devices are set to a server run by the US government. It’s not hard to verify where the archive info leaving a device via any network interface is going. You can’t just hide a connection from the phone to an additional random server, especially if you’re looking for weird connections when validating solutions to implement.

                Is it possible that they have it running to a server run by the company? Of course it’s possible. That doesn’t mean it’s plausible, or even likely here. We don’t know how the app is set up or where it archives to. Assuming it must archive back to the company though is ignorant of how anything remotely related to these types of things work.

                On a side note… When was the contract for this application setup? Was it signed by the Trump admin or has it been in place for years to archive these types of communications and we’re only talking about it now because of the Trump officials being idiots brought it into the news cycle?

                An archiving application isn’t inherently insecure just because it’s third party, or even made by a foreign company. There’s a shit ton of technology bought from foreign countries because that’s the best option.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Sure. You are legally required to archive all correspondence by approved by our security departments software, not a corporate app that shares the info with corporations and are on unsecured servers. Our security warned them to not do this and they did it anyway.

      Also, do you remember “but her emails” for Hillary Clinton? That was because she used a private app for some of her emails. She wasn’t using it to wage a war.

      Lemme get this straight

      It’s a problem for the government to use signal because all govt correspondence needs to be on record and retrievable in the future

      But it’s also a problem to use archiving of encrypted chats?

      Not an American, can someone explain?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4015 days ago

    The article makes me wonder if Waltz is intentionally countering the counter-revolution.

    Either that, or he’s just stupid as fuck.

    Maybe both.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1614 days ago

    I’m just shocked he didn’t have a post-it note with his code written in blue pen in the other hand…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    lol this guy can assemble into a whole war thunder forum on his own

    “send top secret government chats to a server in Israel?”

    YES / LATER

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7215 days ago

    So these convos are backed up somewhere. Outside of government control. Great.

    No wonder they moved fast to block any investigation

    • _cryptagion [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4015 days ago

      It’s backed up to the Israeli software company that makes this unofficial version of Signal. Probably the only people it’s less safe with than the Russians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        i think mossad has work with russia in the past, and they would likely get thier hands on this, and russia can pass it on to iran who will leak it to Hamas,etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1215 days ago

      Noooo, it’s not that they’re guilty of anything… it’s to protect from the deep state and the radical left commiefascist"insertbuzzword"s! I’d put “hey look at the bunny” but these assholes aren’t even trying to distract anymore, it’s just plain and simple corrupt government running for their own best interests while throwing out half hearted stupid sound bites to appease the brain washed.

  • LupusBlackfur
    link
    fedilink
    5215 days ago

    “We are currently clean on OPSEC.”

    “Only the best people.”

    These fucking clowns. I’ve lived through an awful lot of Gov’t by the Stupid…

    (Remember when we thought Bush the Younger was the dumbest president ever…??)

    But this freak show simply outdoes anything that came before. 🙄 🤡 🖕

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7415 days ago

    Jd Vance:

    I have conformation from my counterpart its turned off. He’ll be there.

    Oh boy! Here we go a crimin’ again! ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

  • Ænima
    link
    fedilink
    2615 days ago

    Could it be that Mike was the insider that was leaking stuff to the media and this archiveable version of Signal is to be able to prove and/or keep Signal conversations that would otherwise be removed from the official app? I mean, just them using Signal is a violation of the Records Act, no, due to the ability to remove entire chats after a period of time? Everyone thinks he’s incompetent or dumb, but he may have added that reporter on purpose to expose their use of Signal in the first place and he’s using this unofficial version to save chats we would otherwise not have record of. If the insider info stops now, we’ll know why.