Doesn’t even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    The answer is clearly “no.” He’s been doing unconstitutional shit since day 1, and nobody has stopped him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He does not. He’s above any and all laws. I don’t know why, but he his. The Constitution is meaningless to a king.

  • celeste
    link
    fedilink
    42 months ago

    He doesn’t need to if no one holds him accountable. He should need to, legally, but, in the current environment, he doesn’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    562 months ago

    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

    -President Trump, just this year.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 months ago

    He is performing plausible deniability. Without saying directly yes or no, he is still open to the idea of not upholding the constitution. It is like saying “I can neither confirm nor deny.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 months ago

    Sounds like yet another high crime and misdemeanor. Why doesn’t the co-equal branch established in Article I do it’s duty? And failing that, why doesn’t Hegseth, who has “We the People” tattooed on his drunken forearm, have the courage that he demands of others to tell off his boss? Where are the Oath Keepers who say they are so opposed to a tyrannical government and take their oaths to the Constitution seriously?

    They wipe their collective asses with the Constitution. For that, everyone in this administration, and those who enabled it should burn as the traitors that they are.

  • GladiusB
    link
    fedilink
    72 months ago

    That’s because he can’t spell it without looking at his phone

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 months ago

    To be fair, I don’t know either. I mean he’s supposed to, and he swore an oath to, but if nobody is going to enforce that then must he really? What happens if/when he doesn’t?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 months ago

      I’m mad at the Democrats for under signing a genocide thus disaffecting their would be voters.

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        the world is not binary. there are many people who bare part of the responsibility:

        • the republican party - all of them
        • republican voters
        • the democratic party
        • no-voters (who didn’t want to “support genocide” and now you have a worse genocide and a bunch of other horrible shit including a shit load of extra war crimes in ukraine for the foreseeable future)
        • the media

        these and many more can have played a part all at the same time

          • Pup Biru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            it’s worth calling out all on their own because it surfaces a specific problem… just saying “billionaires ruin everything” isn’t helpful, because it simply shifts blame to a nebulous concept that’s further removed from everyday people

            also, following orders is no excuse

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              That’s valid.

              There used to be laws to force news stations to be bipartisan and show both sides.

              Copypasta:

              The “Fairness Doctrine,” which once required broadcasters to present contrasting viewpoints on controversial issues, was eliminated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1987.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Most of them now seem to follow a fucked-up interpretation of the Fairness Doctrine that requires them to always give the impression that there are no meaningful differences between the parties, which translates into painting Republicans as a perfectly normal, reasonable political party.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        Ikr, so hard to blame the republicans and the people who didn’t vote for the shit us is in rn /s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        This is what you get for running two genocidaires.

        Ahhh there it is… Finally getting honest are we?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What do you mean? The Democrats ran horribly unpopular genocidal candidates and lost. Do you disagree?

              • Jerkface (any/all)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Obviously that is a larger factor for mainstream American acceptance than distant genocide. Most voters have no concept of political theory or world events.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Virtually nobody cared about her being black or a woman.

                  Her policies were horrible period.

                  Most importantly: She got nominated by the DNC because of her horrible policies. Not despite of them.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    192 months ago

    What does it take to get this guy out of office? Genuine question. We impeached this guy like twice but it didn’t go through

    • nkat2112
      link
      fedilink
      English
      352 months ago

      Yes. In fact, you couldn’t be more correct about the matter.

      I would describe his response to the question as fully preposterous.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          I would describe it as treason; specifically, giving aid and comfort to a domestic enemy (himself).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          172 months ago

          If Biden said that the headline would be “Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden Doesn’t Remember Oath of Office He Took Three Months Ago”. It would be brought up in every segment on every news station for weeks. Trump says it and the news is like “That’s kinda weird… Anyways, wonder what Elon is doing…”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            conservative owned MSMs have done that the whole last year. yes all the msm are currently owned by a conservative partially or fully.

            MALONE is the person behind the sudden switch of CNN.