• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 month ago

    I think this is a bit overblown. They only changed “interfering” from a misdemeanor to a felony. They didn’t change the definition interfering. If you’re filming the cops from a safe distance and not interfering, you have an easy to win lawsuit on your hands if they arrest you for legal filming.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 month ago

      … Which is exactly what happens all the time

      I double dare you to go to Texas, find a police officer arresting someone and you go film them from a safe distance. Bonus points if you don’t have a white skin.

      If you survive the ordeal, I’ll see you when you get out of prison after 2 months of waiting for a trial that then never happened because of course they know they can’t jail you for this but they can actually jail you for this until a judge finally says no.

      The real USA doesn’t work like the theory USA

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        In Texas, if you can’t pay bail, it can be years (until the statute of limitations runs out). If you can pay bail, you can get out the next day, but can be out on bail for years (which can come with restrictions of personal freedoms, and is public record [hope you don’t need to find a job during that time]), with court dates every few months, and the DA resetting at the last minute. (personal experience).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        They can already arrest you and do all that with interfering as a misdemeanor. Reclassifying interfering as a felony doesn’t change anything in your scenario. Don’t get me wrong, this is bad, but it doesn’t directly give cops more power. It just increases the punishment for something that is already a crime.

        • Phoenixz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 days ago

          You’re talking about something completely different

          I said filing from a safe distance, that is not interfering and legally very allowed but in practice always a problem

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Guess every Tesla and anyone with a dashcam will be automatically in violation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      And any establishment/property that has security cameras or a doorbell camera.

      That feeling when you’re doing everything according to the law, then a cop walks into the frame and you become an instant felon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    So don’t point a camera at them. I mean they’re cops, there’s so many better things to point at them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 month ago

    Then we just make it a felony to record stuff in any office…CSPAN is so screwed, and so are we.

    • Lukas Murch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      “Saying you don’t need privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don’t need freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden

      • /home/pineapplelover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        My parents came to the US of A because of corruption just like this in their homeland. How far we’ve come.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          Police in the US were created to capture and enslave people of the “wrong” race. There was never a time in the history of the US of A when police were good.

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 month ago

      Can’t record the police, but if someone was recording a news segment and a cop happened to gun down a jaywalker, would they have to stop filming or streaming their feed?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      And its not struck down as a violation of constitutionally protected rights. States can’t violate the constitution with silly laws like this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    On the bright side, this probably means you could refuse to turn over ANY footage to the police by Pleading the Fifth.