Would you like some pie? Check it out here: https://piefed.ca/

What is PieFed

PieFed follows a similar format as Lemmy and Mbin. Those that are familiar with Lemmy will find it very similar, with some additional features including topic lists, optional private voting, new mod and admin tools, crosspost de-duplication, community wikis, etc. Thanks to how the fediverse works, you can use either lemmy.ca or piefed.ca to interact freely!

We will put together some guides on our non-profit’s website at some point. In the meantime, we have created [email protected] for us to learn from each other. There is also the official [email protected] community which has a similar purpose.

We have done some testing and we are learning as we go, but please bear with us while this new platform gets going 🙂

Other Links & FAQ

  • psychadlligoat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    Trying out PieFed after 2 years of Lemmy and it’s looking more and more like Voyager has ended it’s time on my phone

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 month ago

    Awesome, is part of the motivation here to guard a bit against the unpopularity of the Lemmy devs / lemmy.ml?

    I do somewhat feel like they’ve made people a bit more skeptical of the Lemmy name, PieFed might be an easier sell as a reddit alt.

    • vaguerant
      link
      fedilink
      181 month ago

      You might be thinking of Mbin, the other one of the “big three” (more like big one and the other two). Mbin’s biggest differentiating feature is microblog support. It’s hard to boil PieFed down to one main feature compared to Lemmy/Mbin, but anonymous voting and de-duplication of reposts might be the main ones. However, its focus is still on the (Lemmy-style) threaded side of the fediverse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          Out of curiosity, can a community opt out of its comments being bundled with others?

          After seeing it in action, I think that’s actually a nifty feature that most communities and the threadiverse as a whole would benefit from, but I could also potentially foresee a minority of communities not wanting to increase their comments exposure to that degree.

          • Kichae
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            Honestly, I think it’s one of the most undercutting, least thought out features in piefed, that focuses entirely on the immediaye convenience of the end user over the health of the discussion groups and servers that make up the network.

            It’s the eating a tub of icing for supper of social media features.

            • OtterOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              PieFed is developing rapidly, and these sound like reasonable concerns that the developers might address at some point :)

              Looks like someone else tagged the dev already, we can also post suggestions in [email protected]

          • Rimu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            Thinking a bit bigger - I’d like to see a ‘private community’ feature which limits the visibility of posts inside to community members only. With an optional approval process to join.

            That would take care of the comment bundling issue too.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I think there would still be a desire for the relative in-between setting of just opting out of the bundling. My reasoning is that a community may want to be open to be viewed and commented by anyone so that they continue to grow and have more participation, either by search or random encounter from the /all view, as that allows slow organic growth with relatively few people wanting to go in there and derail conversations.

              With bundling, that community will be seen by far more non-members than ever before if a popular link is posted around to multiple communities, inviting a significant amount of outside participation, and the potential for a much increased need to keep things on topic, or to step in and moderate drama from other communities with wildly different perspectives.

              Without the ability to opt out of bundling, this leaves only the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

              The only other option would be for a community to request their admin defederate from the troublesome community, or from the outside instance entirely, which is using a mallet to solve something that could be done with scalpel.

              I do think the bundling is quite nice overall, and I don’t foresee a problem with it being the default, but I do strongly see the need for that middle ground option to opt-out, personally. The way Lemmy currently operates by default is effectively that middle-ground option that is missing from Piefed.

              • Rimu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                the two extremes of potentially unwanted isolation, or potentially unwanted increased outside participation.

                Yes that’s a good way to put it. Thanks.

    • Bo7a
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Mmmmmmmmmmm. Sugar Pie. My birthday treat!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 month ago

    Stuff like this really helps reinforce why the fediverse is the best platform. Portability is no joke.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    It suck that they implements karma and collapsing downvoted comments. Two censorship methods

    • OtterOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      The collapsing of downvoted comments is configurable in the user settings, so it’s possible to disable it or fine tune it to the way you want it. The discussion is still valid for what the default settings should be

      I’m still learning about the karma side, so I don’t want to comment on that yet

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        Should be the opposite, people who want to collapse comment with lot of downvotes should activate it

    • Nils
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      This is ActivityPub, not Reddit. It is optional, democratic and auditable.

      People are not sending posts/comment to be approved first, you can post whatever you want. It is a plus if the community found a bad faith actor and tagged them. So I am not forced to see their disinformation campaign.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        We all know that most people use downvotes as a disagree button not just to suppress hate speech and any other really harmful opinions. There is a report button for that. Even an opinion based comment could be heavily downvoted

    • Jerry on PieFed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      The downvotes and karma do not stop you from saying whatever you want. It just means you have to say it somewhere else. Hence, you are not censored.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Nice. Already registered.

    Is there a recommended android app for it?

    I just saw the FAQ section after.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Well… It’s the same management. It gives users another option for how to consume but it doesn’t add a lot of diversity. No fault implied.