• Rose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11729 days ago

    “Documentation is like sex: You’re not getting any”

  • SavvyWolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3129 days ago

    Incidentally, both bad sex and code documentation both involve std vectors.

    • Malgas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 days ago

      It’s fine, babe, the doctor said I’ve got a standard.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    5129 days ago

    Absolutely not. I’d rather have no documentation and start from scratch than be gaslit by an entire team of people telling me that the very obviously wrong documentation is correct and has been correct for 30 years

    • stochastictrebuchet
      link
      fedilink
      729 days ago

      Literally me yesterday trying to decipher Baidu’s PaddleOCR docs. Have half a mind to aim Claude Code at the URL and just be like ‘plz help’

    • kubica
      link
      fedilink
      1329 days ago

      Well, sometimes I ask questions to the AI and makes the same sense.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    229 days ago

    There’s this cool program called qalc. I stumble on to cool features in it that’s not even listed in the documentation.

  • Boomkop3
    link
    fedilink
    229 days ago

    Deal, I’ve got plenty of small hobby projects that can use some!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Also asexual.

      Just consider most people really like sex, and some experience it as a very intense physical want to the point it makes sense that a bad version of it is better than none at all. Sort of similar to food. Better to have bad-tasting food and at least sate your hunger than to have nothing and starve.

      Although, of course, it breaks down. The comments talk about actively harmful sex people wouldn’t want as well as harmful documentation; bad sex and documentation is not actually always better than no sex or no documentation. In the analogy, this would be sex that gives you an STD, or documentation that sends you running in circles and misleads you.

      I’ve found a lot of understanding sex comes with just understanding a lot of people really really want it and experience it as a nigh-on need. Maybe liken it to some intense desires you have, things you need to be happy that you nonetheless don’t need to survive. (Of course, this is a generalization, I understand not all people with sexual desires have them this intensely. Some don’t need it to be happy but would sure like it a lot. And some might even get it more mildly. But for the purpose of understanding more mainstream jokes, analogies, etc. about sex…)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      929 days ago

      Maybe it can be translated into something else, like, “Documentation is like toilet paper, when it’s good it’s good, when it’s bad it’s better than nothing”? Or, “Documentation is like clothes, even if they are bad it’s better than nothing”, or “Documentation is like having something you need, it’s better to have the thing you need even if is not good, than to not have the thing you need at all”?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        629 days ago

        I like the analogy with toilet paper. Because when its bad, the very thing that was supposed to help you, got you covered in shit with no back out plan, making it that much worse.

        Very fitting

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      In general it’s supposed to be something good so it shouldn’t be harmful, but ofc exceptions exist, especially with sex, sadly…

      Bad often equals “not super good” in this context

  • Owl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2629 days ago

    Bad documentation could land you in prison.

    Bad sex is just horrible all around.

    not sure what this post is on about