The House of Representatives is trying to pass a resolution making the term “Free Palestine” an official antisemitic slogan.

Republican Representative Gabe Evans from Colorado introduced the resolution in the wake of the attack on a gathering for Israeli hostages in Boulder this week. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been charged for the attack, during which he yelled “Free Palestine,” according to the FBI.

“Whereas, while shouting ‘Free Palestine,’ an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people, Mohammed Sabry Soliman attacked the peaceful demonstrators with homemade Molotov cocktails,” the resolution reads. House Republicans are expected to vote on the nonbinding resolution next week.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    827 days ago

    Jewish man here.

    FREE PALESTINE!

    Israel is a terror state.

    The USA is a rogue state.

    Get your pitchforks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    527 days ago

    Even the actual Nazis werent as bold as to start calling other people Nazis just to distract from themselves.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1028 days ago

    Look guys, if the people who go around blaming Jews for trying to replace white people say Free Palestine is antisemitic, who are we to argue? I never knew space lasers could be so Jewish until the authorities on antisemitism enlightened me. Was it not a nutcase conservative who taught you the power of a few parenthesis? They’re the experts here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2628 days ago

    You would think they would start with an easier one like “heil Hitler” being antisemitic, but they seem perfectly okay with that one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    427 days ago

    Someone no doubt once argued against Antisemitic law with the reasoning that it could be used to justify whatever those in power wanted and that was not a wise risk to take. Someone else said ‘shut up, you racist’ and passed the laws.

    Those people armed their opponents with the very weapons that would be used against them. Congrats, liberals. Your unwise use of power has empowered the unwise.

    • acargitzOP
      link
      fedilink
      028 days ago

      The Semites thing is a red herring. anti-Semitism is Jew hatred.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      227 days ago

      Saving people a quick search.

      What is meant by semitic people?

      Semitic describes a group of languages — including Hebrew and Arabic — as well as the people who traditionally speak them. Semitic is rooted in the Biblical name Shem, the son of Noah, who is traditionally thought of as the direct ancestor of the Jews and Arabs.

      • acargitzOP
        link
        fedilink
        127 days ago

        “Semites” as a description of a set of people is as much antiquated a terminology as the word “Aryans”. In fact it was Ernest Renan that first made that distinction in the 19th century to specifically frame history as a tension between Semites and Aryans (cf Hannah Arendt). It’s of course just a bunch of scientific racism bollocks. And it is precisely because of that that the term “antisemitism” has always meant hatred of Jews in particular (in the “Jews vs Aryans” sense).

        The only term that persists in the sciences today is the term “semitic languages”, which is basically similar to “indo-european languages”, and which of course has nothing to do with antisemitism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      828 days ago

      This is just the right wing weaponizing accusations of antisemitism even as they, themselves, are antisemitic.

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    2028 days ago

    I’m not antisemitic. I know that I’m not, even if I can’t prove that to anyone who cannot see into my mind. But in words and actions, I’ve never done or said anything antisemitic.

    I believe that Palestine should be free. Passing a law isn’t going to change my mind or affect my behavior. If someone calls me antisemitic, they’re either mistaken or lying. Passing a law won’t change the truth behind their words.

    • Nate Cox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      628 days ago

      Making a statement legally classified as antisemitism opens up legal retaliation under the guise of “hate speech”, which is not protected speech.

      It doesn’t change the truth of it, but it does change he the consequences of it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Not be contrarian, but this is a common misconception. Hate speech IS protected speech in the US, but it can be used to enhance the punishment of a related crime into a hate crime.

        It can also, under specific circumstances, be considered “fighting words”. But again, that depends on the specific context and is not broadly true.

        This is one of my least favorite facts, but it is unfortunately true

        • Nate Cox
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          I mean, if we’re being technical then “hate speech” isn’t a legal term at all, but I should have made it clearer that I was alleging the republicans were building their usual flimsy-as-shit-case to harass their “enemies”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            128 days ago

            That is for sure. There is no question that it is an asinine attempt by the GOP to weaponize the law, rather than a genuine attempt at protecting Jews in any way, shape or form

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          As if it fucking matters when we have students being deported for writing an op-ed in their school newspaper suggesting Israel stop committing genocide.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5728 days ago

    Next up, Republicans prepare bill declaring “Black Lives Matter” is racist against white people.

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        928 days ago

        I have that bumper sticker on my vehicle. Hasn’t been vandalized yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          728 days ago

          People who say things like this usually act like black and brown lives don’t matter.

          Which is the crux of the problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            027 days ago

            Black lives matter means all racial groups lives matter? Wouldn’t that imply all racial groups are black?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              126 days ago

              I know it might be difficult to grasp, but no.

              The point of the slogan is to bring attention to the fact that, in countless ways, black lives are currently treated as if they matter less. On a systemic level. So before you say I’m calling you racist, that’s not what’s happening.

              It might make more sense if you mentally add the word “too” at the end of it. “Black Lives Matter too” is pretty much the gist of it.

    • Kruh Master
      link
      fedilink
      English
      228 days ago

      It’s not illegal yet, but go on, do your virtue posturing 👍

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        528 days ago

        And a nonbinding bill that flies in the face of the first amendment isn’t posturing?

        We should expect better from elected officials than randos on the internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1828 days ago

        1st amendment baby. Can’t be made illegal and they can’t redefine just like they can’t redefine pi as 3.14. It simply isn’t antisemitism to call for the liberation of an oppressed people.

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          928 days ago

          And this isn’t even a law, it’s a resolution.

          That’s literally the least thing Congress can do, after just walking into the building.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2328 days ago

    Didn’t Orwell have something to say about redefining words and phrases. Well, even if he didn’t, yikes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      He sure did… Controlling language as a means of eventually controlling thought.

      I always thought that part of the book seemed boring and far-fetched in my teens and 20s.

      Boy was I wrong

    • Omnifarious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1228 days ago

      You have been cordially invited to the Ministry of Love good citizen. A black van with blacked-out windows will be arriving soon.