• BeautifulMind ♾️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Vaccines cause… kids to grow up and become adults. Autism? It means I have limited social energy and I’m so good at seeing patterns I keep getting told they aren’t there and I need to be reasonable🤣

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Yes, vaccines cause adults… I’m not a big fan of a lot of those kinds of people, especially when they’re stupid enough to contradict scientists and doctors, telling them shit like “vaccines cause autism” and “the earth is flat”.

        Those are my least favorite kind of person.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          The Earth is flat people are like entry level 1 conspiracy theorist. They believe in a stupid conspiracy that is easily disproven but ultimately they are harmless.

          The vaccines cause autism people on the other hand should be rounded up and arrested for child neglect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Perhaps the unique perspective and skill sets of people with autism have contributed to medical breakthroughs that indeed resulted in new vaccines.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I can definitely see someone on the spectrum being obsessed with biology and solving diseases. If anyone is going be an expert at one specific thing, it’s someone with autism.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    452 years ago

    “Educate yourself” means to look up a few random Facebook posts that agree with your viewpoint and tell others that they are stupid for being brainwashed sheeple.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2232 years ago

    they said to “educate yourself”, not “get education from experts and professors”

    checkmate

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        You joke, but I have watched so many YouTube tutorials on unreal engine, Godot, and Blender to learn game development stuff. I wouldn’t say I’m an expert. But I definitely know a lot more than I did a few years ago.

        • sadreality
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Sucking down high quality content has unintended consequences of educating the masses on random shit haha

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          I’m going to guess you did more than just watch videos… If you also applied that knowledge in practical work, you did educate yourself on how to use those tools.

          Whatever you made is the validation/grading of your education. IMO that’s a perfectly valid way to get an education, for those kinds of topics. It’s much more risky to grade yourself on abstract knowledge where you can’t directly make something and see if it works or not.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            So I should start practicing my random medical knowledge from the internet on real subjects! Got it. Thanks!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              82 years ago

              If they start bleeding unexpectedly just send them to the waiting room while you look it up on YouTube!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              I would wait a few years, make sure you’ve really watched a lot of YouTube videos on medical stuff.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            Well said. I learned how to use Photoshop 4.0 by following online tutorials. I had no formal training in any kind of graphic design, I had zero artistic ability. But following Doc Ozone and Andy’s Awesome Art tutorials, I became good enough with the software to get a job designing ads for a local newspaper publisher.

            As much as I learned, I still never thought I was smarter or knew more than the people who actually went to school for the knowledge, the people who spent years honing their craft. And that was just doing basic graphic design. I can’t imagine the thoughts going through a person’s head when they think watching some videos on YouTube make them qualified to make actual life or death healthcare decisions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      What do actual doctors who have studied for years know?!? My grandad said rub some dirt in it. Sure, my niece died of e-coli, but it wasn’t the rare pork, she just didn’t pray hard enough.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    Image Transcription:

    X/Twitter post by user Nicole Baldwin, MD, FAAP @NicoleB_MD reading: Tried my hand at #Tiktok - this one struck a nerve. #VaccinateYourKids #VaccinesWork #somedocs Attached is a screenshot from a Tiktok video showing a woman with a stethoscope around her neck, leaning slightly forward and pointing at on-screen text reading: Vaccines DON’T CAUSE AUTISM A user with their username redacted has replied to the post with the text: Educate yourself woman Below that is a reply from Dr Nicole Baldwin to the unknown user reading: I did. Thanks. 4 years of college. 4 years of medical school. 3 years of pediatric residency. 13 years of clinical practice. 👌

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Hold up. Whenever I see this stuff the disclaimer at the end is almost always “I’m a bot…” Yadda yadda yadda…

      I just noticed that’s NOT what it says. So… Umm… Hi.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Why is who’s making them important? A pediatrician is someone who’s field is child medical care, including vaccines. I can guarantee she’s pretty up to date in the literature surrounding vaccine efficacy and dangers to children. Part of being a doctor is learning to read studies and interpret them, and also keeping up to date with the literature, especially in your field.

      For your example, your doctor might not know the answer to the exact question you ask, but they have training on how to get the answer that an average person doesn’t. They should understand sigma levels of studies and what types of trials are better or worse for determining cause and effect. They (hopefully) won’t just accept the first Google result that pops up. They also can recommend you to see a specialist if it’s out of their domain.

    • barooboodoo (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Thanks for your bullshit anecdotes. Next time your house is on fire tell the firefighters you’ll wait for the people that made or approved their fire hose.

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    262 years ago

    But how many years of youtube study? How long has she been writing papers for anonymous society? I think all her medical practice and education shows how really uneducated she is.

  • Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    852 years ago

    In all fairness that wouldn’t make her an expert on vaccines. People hold doctors to some mythical genius standard when it’s more of a trade school.

    A vaccine researcher would be an expert on vaccines and their studies show no correlation with autism.

    The whole shit show started over a fake study that was disproven.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Med school is definitely not a trade school. The amount of material I learned per day in med school was about the same quantity as a week of college.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        And if only, it was just him in the autism field. SBC isn’t better than him on the piece of shit scale.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          There’s a whole industry of quacks exploiting families desperate for answers and solutions when they feel out of their depth with a child they don’t fully understand. Makes me sick.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        352 years ago

        Wakefield was a POS.

        He wasn’t just wrong. He was intentionally dishonest. He caused many people to avoid vaccines because they might cause an issue.

        I know several people, myself included who’ve had issues with vaccines. I still strongly support vaccines.

        Do I get the flu vaccine every year? No. It doesn’t sit well with me but I’m not against it. I just don’t handle it well but I’m making an informed decision.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Figured the fraud mentioned in the wiki article covered the “dishonest” part and “wrong” was easier to prove. I can’t rule out the possibility that he’s in so deep that he really believes what he’s saying (not that it’d make the situation any better).

          Sucks to hear that you’ve had bad reactions in the past but I’m glad it didn’t turn you against them as a whole. Hopefully enough of the rest of us can get them and lower the overall risk of illness when flu season rolls around.

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            72 years ago

            My friend developed Alopecia from the flu vaccine. He doesn’t get that flu vaccine but does the others.

            I got a heart condition from the Covid booster. As such I don’t do boosters anymore but I still do other vaccines.

            I’m very pro vaccine in general. They’ve never been a guarantee they’ll stop an outbreak but they greatly reduce the chances of most diseases spreading or making you seriously ill.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I’m actually the same way, I’m one of those that got myocarditis after the vaccine, but I also understand that nothing is side affect free so while it stinks for me I still 100% support the use of vaccines… Thankfully after a few weeks/months the heart palpitations stopped.

              I mean … Polio anyone? No? Chickenpox? Oh yeah that’s right, vaccines. They actually worked.

              • Neuromancer
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Bingo. Same here and it caused some blood pressure issues.

                I just changed medications to see if the palpitations went away and it appears they did. So that’s good.

                Blood pressure is better but it’s mediated. I want to go off that next.

                Chickenpox. Ahem. We didn’t have a vaccine for that when I was a child. We just caught it and were miserable for a few weeks. I wish we’d had the vaccine. That was awful.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Chickenpox. Ahem. We didn’t have a vaccine for that when I was a child. We just caught it and were miserable for a few weeks.

                  I’m sorry to tell you that’s not what happened.

                  You had chickenpox for a few weeks whilst the shingles bedded down nice and cosy in your nerves ready to strike again when your immune system is down. It’s not over and it’ll be worse when it comes back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          IIRC, he wasn’t even anti vax at the start. He was being paid to peddle separate vaccines and claimed it was just the MMR jab that could cause autism.

          Which is still bollocks anyway, but people will do anything to deny that autism runs in their family…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think you’re missing that she is a pediatrician and not just a “doctor.” Pediatricians administer a big majority of vaccines and care for the patients receiving them. They probably do learn a hell of a lot more about them than, say, an oncologist who spends all their time treating cancer in old people. And they see the effects of them up close in the field. Any doctor is constantly researching and staying up to date. A pediatrician worth their salt is very well educated on all relevant studies even if they didn’t conduct those studies with their own two hands. I reject the notion that you need to conduct the studies to know the science: that’s a ludicrous bar for us to set.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            How is that not the point he made?

            How is it not accurate? Someone’s titles or anecdotal evidence are irrelevant when statistics about millions of individuals are the only tool to reveal such tiny issues. If one doctor would already notice issues with something, then the whole massive chain that led to the human use of that medicine completely failed in an unprecedented way - after all, even the most basic tests should have immediately revealed problems.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              A doctor has access to totally different electronic information services than the average jackass on Facebook, if you didn’t know. Lawyers and journalists have their own versions of this too. So yeah, any doctor has better info than any private individual.

              More importantly, they have well-informed judgment about how to consume those statistics, quality them, and apply them. This is quite important as the average Facebook jackass is bombarded by deliberately misleading information which they need to think critically about unraveling.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                How does a doctor have different access to papers with statistical analysis regarding such topics?

                Does a lawyer have different laws than those I can look at?

                Better judgement, yes, valid point.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Have you tried to read a primary resource, scientific article? They are mostly behind a paywall, hospitals and universities pay for subscription access. So yes, doctors and researchers have easier access to papers than the public (and the expertise to critically evaluate the information presented). Also, those large cohort studies with thorough stats are a huge amount of work and always have a team of people to design the experiments, interact with patients, get the data, run the stats, and so forth. MDs would be in the mix there too, it’s not like a single immunologist would do the whole thing alone…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You can get into a research career as an MD too. It’s not strictly clinical practice.

      We’re all encouraged to publish papers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      In even more fairness, reading memes on Facebook makes you even less of an expert on vaccines.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        That it does.

        I use to administrator a lot of vaccines in the army. That still doesn’t make me an expert.

        I listen to experts and read studies. I’m a bit of vaccine nerd. It’s basically using out body to fight an infection and find it fascinating.

        The one that really interest me is the Cuban lung cancer vaccine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Nowhere did the woman in the image claim to be an “expert,” though, so why bring it up? Everyone giving advice about something doesn’t have to be an expert.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            They’re trying to cast doubt. Doesn’t need to make sense, just needs to increase turmoil in the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      First of all, fuck you. Nowhere did anyone say she was an expert. Like let me just pick up this goal post and move it.

      Second of all fuck you. You don’t need to be an expert know the experts opinion.

      Did I mention, fuck you?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      382 years ago

      I love when people claim to not trust the science of vaccines. Vaccines created using the same scientific method that allowed the invention of the smart phones they’re typing from. The same science that allows for all modern medicine, energy production, manuacturing, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I mean, the scientific method produces mistakes - it’s just that the scientific method is also intended to fix those mistakes over time. Being critical of research is helpful for the correct functioning of the scientific method, but this has nothing to do with conspiracy theorists who will question the overwhelmingly corroborated general principles that determine the functioning of AC or light bulbs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        most cookers don’t understand what the scientific method is. my brother thinks it’s like some list of formulas scientists use to see if something is true or not, not the entire actual process around theory/observation/evidence/peer review. they thibk “science” indoctrinates people to think a certain way and that scientists somehow are told to ignore everything not in a textbook. no explaining how wrong this is in over 3 years has helped

  • ryan213
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    I wonder what that dummy thought “MD” stood for. Mommy Daddy?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    39
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I started at a point of “vaccines obviously don’t cause autism, that’s absurd.”

    I transitioned through “even if they did, there’s nothing wrong with being autistic”

    These days I’m at “autistic people are way better than NT people and I wish vaccines caused autism”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      If you said that NT were way better, you’d be called an asshole and bigot. How’s the reverse any different?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Because neurotypical people are in the majority, are not marginalized, and have all the power in the relationship between the two groups.

        Why is it so hard for bigots to understand that society creates a context.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Yeahhh I can appreciate the well meant sentiment he was going for but he circled all the way back to being prejudiced lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          You know this analogy is bullshit. Saying “type x of people are better” will always be the wrong thing to say

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Autism is literally a disability. A disability is literally a disadvantage. In that sense, NT people have a decided advantage over NDs.

            Are they “better”? Well, no. But the world is made for NTs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      292 years ago

      No. I’ve come to terms with who I am and even like some aspects of it that I would miss so I wouldn’t give it up if I had the choice, but it’s a disability for me, has been a very hard struggle, and I don’t even have it as severe as some. I wouldn’t wish this on more people. (Unless it was 100% of people because most of the struggles I have with the tism come from trying to live in a world designed by NTs that probably wouldn’t exist in a world where everyone had tism)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Autism is a wide spectrum involving people with different life experiences. It’s ok for you to say that you personally don’t like being autistic, but do not use that to throw dirt on the people who are doing fine despite social discrimination.

        Unless it was 100% of people because most of the struggles I have with the tism come from trying to live in a world designed by NTs that probably wouldn’t exist in a world where everyone had tism

        …And this adds even more to my point. This sounds to me like the message of someone who isn’t suffering so much due to their innate characteristics as they have due to being discriminated. If you’re at that point, the logical position isn’t “I wish to be normal”, but “I wish society wasn’t so full of assholes and was more tolerant”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Nobody likes being autistic for fuck sakes. It’s like saying don’t kick dirt on people who say they’re happy they lost their legs in an accident because their wheelchair is handier.

          The idea that people with autism is some kind of trade-off with benefits is a Rain Man fallacy. Whatever weird quirks come with it that are endearing, a thousand awful things make it hard to live with.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                The most difficult part of having autism for me is the need to analyze everything to try and figure out why people are acting the way they are.

                No issues here, that attitude helps to solve misunderstandings.

                I was thinking you might have autism from your post

                Correct, I said so somewhere else.

                They are expressing their feelings, and a neurotypical person would probably see your response as dismissive because you are telling them what they should feel instead.

                I don’t want to invalidate anyone’s feelings, but everyone might have misdirected feelings sometimes. For instance, it is common among victims of abuse to hate themselves rather than the perpetrators of the abuse. If someone has an inherently debilitating condition, it’s perfectly natural for them to hate that condition. If someone has a condition that is, for the most part, neutral, but suffers social discrimination because of it, and places the origin of their pain in their condition, rather than in the discrimination, that is similar to an ethnic minority who suffers from racism growing into hating the fact that they’re an ethnic minority. If someone literally says “most of the struggles I have with the tism come from trying to live in a world designed by NTs”, that pretty much sounds like they do fit what I’m saying. Because autism is a wide spectrum, I’m aware that some people in it do actually have innate difficulties due to being on the spectrum that wouldn’t have emerged in a perfect environment, and if you read my original comment, you’ll see that I’m speaking in terms of possibilities and conditionals. But there is also a lot of autistic people who shouldn’t unload their loathing into being autistic, but into the fact that suffering discrimination through their whole lives has made them accrue so much trauma that they’ve developed a different debilitating condition.

                I am thinking that you might be getting downvoted because the problem seems to be an emotional subtext that isn’t immediately obvious.

                That’s the case for at least some of the downvotes. There is also at least one user who was defending the narrative that every person on the spectrum should hate the condition.

                I am thinking they expect you to identify yourself as having autism, and without that frame of reference a neurotypical person might jump to conclusions that you aren’t?

                Do you mean this in the sense that I didn’t initially mention I’m autistic, or in the sense of the dichotomy “being autistic vs having autism”? If it’s the former, that’s on their part for jumping into conclusions. If it’s the latter, they should read into it and accept the reasons that lead some people to prefer one kind of language over the other.

                I appreciate your interest into having a clear understanding of the discussion. Have a good day.

            • @[email protected]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Please read the rules of this community before participating again. Aggressiveness is not welcome here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Have you actually warned and removed the comment that said “no one likes being autistic” as well?

                • @[email protected]OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  If you see a comment that breaks the rules, please report it and include which rule you believe it violated in the “reason” box. Don’t argue/reply to comments that break the rules, just ignore them or block the user after you’ve reported it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Oh, I getchu. I would say a huge component of the disability, probably almost all of it, is because of the ways society is structured to punish anyone who isn’t a NT majority-demographic person. (Which means it literally would be better if it was 100%).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          That is precisely the issue. The world runs on NT worldviews. Try making someone with autism give a fuck about money (unless that’s their special interest). You can’t. And since this world is run on obsession with money, NT people win and ND people get fucked

    • SphericalKat
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Me and my girlfriend are both autistic and we would never wish this on anyone. Our child will most likely be autistic, and while we’re more than fine with that, we’d love if the kid didn’t have to go through the same shit as us

      Make no mistake, I love who I am, but being ND is a disability and struggle for the rest of your life

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      This comment stinks of someone without a disability having wishful thinking.

      Yes, it’s true my daughter is the sweetest, most loving, perfect child on the planet. But she also didn’t get potty trained until age 6. She will never be able to drive. She’s only going to be able to hold the most basic jobs. She’ll likely never be able to live independently.

      There is definitely nothing wrong with autism and she is easily way better than any other person I’ve ever met. But she also faces some real challenges in life, and I don’t wish that everyone in the world had that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Thank you for pointing this out, many people are not aware of what real autism is like, and associate mild adhd or just distraction as a result of to much internet as autism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      That’s a nice sentiment but autism is a very difficult disability that makes independence extremely difficult. You’ll certainly find that parents love their children even with autism but you won’t find any parents who have enjoyed the struggle of learning how to cope with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ok, that’s not 100% true as autism is a spectrum. Sure there are some parts of the spectrum that does make independence difficult.

        As someone who is on the spectrum, I have trouble with social situations, including sarcasm and taking things literally - I struggle to take a hint and unless you make it extremely obvious I won’t notice flirting… I don’t even notice myself flirting tbh - I try not to use that as an excuse. but I’m reasonable with money management, and I do quite well on my own (I spend more time by myself on my computer and technology than I do with my parents, and we live in the same house.) I have a full time job (still trying to work out how I managed that tbh) with an upcoming pay rise due to a contract buyout. (Let’s fucking go!)

        Not all autism is the same, and sure there are some higher ends of the spectrum that people require assistance, and then there’s everyone in between. I needed more assistance in school - I never finished an exam before my extended time limit , and I had regular extensions on assignments. But aside from that I got through it mostly on my own.

        I wasn’t diagnosed until after my first semester of uni, as public service autism assessments had a waiting list and going private was incredibly expensive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Not all autism is the same, and sure there are some higher ends of the spectrum that people require assistance, and then there’s everyone in between

          I think it’s wonderful you’re on the better end of the spectrum, as you say. However, it may be wise for you to learn that not all, in fact not most, people with autism are so gainfully prosperous.

          Canadian study:

          The study shows 33 per cent of autistic adults reported being employed in 2017, compared to 14 per cent in 2012. However, the numbers continue to pale in comparison to the 80 per cent employment rate of adults without a disability.

          From a United States perspective, and based on their data, Autism Speaks shared that:

          Studies estimate that 50 to 75 % of the roughly 5.6 million autistic adults in the U.S. are underemployed or unemployed. Nearly half of 25-year-olds with autism have never held a paying job. More than 60% of autistic young adults are neither working nor pursuing education/training post-high school in the U.S.

          In terms of the global unemployment rate, the National Autistic Society in the U.K. released a survey in 2016 that confirmed the 85% number. They found that:

          Under 16% have full-time paid work 16% are in part-time paid employment In all, less than a third of autistic adults have any paid work Just over half (51%) of autistic people who are working said that their skills were higher than those their job required (underemployed)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Sadly a lot of that isn’t necessarily about ability to work, but ability to get through a job interview.

            The whole interview process is going to weed out the candidates who aren’t as sociable, outgoing, charismatic, etc. They are going to look at body language and eye contact while doing small talk. A lot of soft skills like that are more important to pass a job interview than actual technical knowledge. Even when the job has no customer facing requirements.

            They also tend to not have the connections that get your foot in the door.

            It’s bias in an interview process that isn’t designed with autism in mind. Many who have high IQ with attention to detail, technical skills and are hard workers are still unable to get a job offer because they come off as disinterested or awkward.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              It isn’t just the interview part. The entire job application process is discriminatory against neurodivergent people. For example pretty much any time a company does one of these hokey “personality tests” as part of it’s employee selection it heavily selects against people with autism. They aren’t allowed to refuse to hire disabled people but they certainly do their best to make it a forgone conclusion anyway.

  • MarkC568
    link
    fedilink
    542 years ago

    Anyone who tells you to “educate yourself” probably barely made it out of high school.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        First of all, you don’t need to censor yourself. Everyone knows what you wrote and the teacher isn’t going to get mad at you.

        Second, censoring slurs is still a slur. Cut it out. You know better, hence the censor, but you chose to be an asshole anyway.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          No I think it’s fair to use against people who SHOULD rightly be wiser than they are ever capable of demonstrating.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            "I only use the n-word when the black person I’m saying it to deserves it. "

            -you, probably

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    Oh yeah? Well, how many Youtube videos has this elitist “scientist” published? How many suppliment pills has she sold online? Why should I trust her?