• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17410 days ago

      Just downloaded it and skimmed by frames… Seems to be a list of reasons to degoogle. Mentions privacy, security, and how Google is extending fingers into everyone’s privacy by browser, password manager, wallet, phone, etc.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          English
          119
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Really didn’t like him when he was younger, he was a naive swedish kid that didn’t realize that the dumb shit he said online had ramifications because his audience was so big. He helped platform Ben Shapiro to a younger generation when he had him on his channel for a video, he had that scandal where he said the n word, and then of course the clip where he says the glass ceiling doesn’t exist. It’s clear to me he didn’t realize the cultural and political ramifications of that stuff in America because he was never really exposed to it growing up in Sweden, and he was a cocky 20 something that thought he knew everything.

          I hope these days he’s realizing how idiotic some of that shit was and is actually trying to use his platform to make his viewers aware of valid issues rather than spouting off about topics he knows nothing about to his viewers who take his word as truth.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4010 days ago

            He also paid some Africans to hold an anti-semitic sign. To prove people will do things for money I think?

            • Lv_InSaNe_vL
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2110 days ago

              The entire thesis of that video was “fiver and things like that lead to exploitation of the global poor”, the sign thing was just a catchy clickbait thing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1010 days ago

              I think his reasoning was to see how far the sign holding folks would go for money, and they apparently didn’t really have any limits. Should he have done and shown it on youtube is the thing he can be criticized for

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                That’s pretty apalling.

                What kind of following sticks with someone who humiliates people just because they could use extra grocery money? Just because he had so much cash that he could take a voyercation to somewhere unfamiliar to do it?

                If he’s come to his senses, fine. Anyway if new users can’t figure out CWs and pronouns… that’s why we have de-fed, block, and filter…

                Maybe someone thought genocide imagery and messaging was a ha ha funny toy. I’m not over it, as someone who deals with hatecrimey stuff on the reg.

        • Ricky Rigatoni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6510 days ago

          Heartbreaking: one of the most deplorable people in the world made a good point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4410 days ago

            If pewdiepie is one of the most deplorable people in the world you know of. You must live in some kind of alternative universe and in paradise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5410 days ago

            I mean I don’t really consider him a deplorable person… He was a dumb edgy teen 15 years ago that happened to strike a cord with the overwhelming amount of dumb edgy teens on youtube, and strike it rich. I haven’t paid a ton of attention to him, but from what I saw of his linux and gadget crafting videos, it sounds like he’s grown up a fair amount from his days of scream streaming.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2010 days ago

                Everyone is a edgy teenager well into their 20s.

                As the joke goes, if your 18 your a child, if your 23 your a teenager, if your 29 your 30, if your 34 your late 20s, if your 35 your 35.

                Most people in most western worlds don’t even get to start being an adult till they are well into their mid 20s, which means they only START growing up at like 24-25.

                It takes years to actually mature. Anyone who understand this has never worked a job that has frequent fresh to the workforce people cycling though frequently.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1510 days ago

                  I was about to respond with this, you’re still in college in your early 20s. Most of us don’t get a four year degree done in actual four years

                  We got junior devs in their late 20s because they were doing grad school until like 28

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2210 days ago

                Valid… but also have to point out he hit big as a celebrity. When you are literally raking in millions of dollars. He was about 21 when he started his channel. and bottom line is, he got views, he got likes, and it turned into real cash. Most of our jobs etc… encourage us to grow up. His job, rewarded him for catering to his base… which of were younger than him.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                610 days ago

                Others have pointed out how people keep growing up in their 20s and 30s. But also as a media personality, you can’t ignore the possibility that he’s playing a character on camera. It could legitimately be he just kept acting like his younger self while recording because that pays the bills

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 days ago

            What’s he done to earn that title really? We live in a world of genocide, pointless wars and rapists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4210 days ago

          I’ve never watched him (I hated him when he would just scream at video games) but he seems to be a lot more mature these days. He even posted a video on why you should switch to Linux recently

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 days ago

          How are you going to do that advertising using one of their products? He has 100M followers and he’s a multi millionare, he should close his youtube account and move in another platform

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 days ago

            Good point. People should only advocate for dgoogling on platforms full of people who have already degoogled. It’s stupid to try and reach people still using Youtube.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 days ago

          I disagree. Things seem to get worse when the herds move to them. It’s as if things are good precisely because they aren’t there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2210 days ago

            bro, open your mind for a minute. Privacy is for everyone. And we need masses wanting privacy otherwise nothing changes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              410 days ago

              I definitely agree with you, but I remember how Digg & then Reddit both went to shit once the masses started to use them. Same with Facebook.

              I feel like if we all spread out between multiple platforms, none will become big enough for the enshitification to hit them.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                510 days ago

                Aha, I understand what you mean. Maybe that’s kind of why fediverse (federation) makes sense. At least with social networks.

          • Norah (pup/it/she)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1110 days ago

            I think you’re seeing the wrong causation when it comes to enshittification. FOSS licenses prevent that sort of thing from happening. Linux is already, by far and away, the most popular server OS so consumers moving to it isn’t going to make it worse.

            I dunno, maybe be less of a hipster bestie?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 days ago

          Calling this guy an ass shows that you have no idea who he is. You’re probably the type of person who thinks they’re well informed but exclusively get their info from echo chambers like Lemmy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8310 days ago

      He switched to linux a while back. Now he’s trying to switch as much of the rest of his digital life to FOSS/non-profit stuff. He advocates for duckduckgo, firefox, paid email, graphene os, selfhosted vaultwarden, nextcloud, anything but google maps, kodi, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 days ago

      Just throwing this out there, you can open the video and expand the description and there is a button you can click on to view the transcript of the video and then you can just copy that out into a text editor or read it right there

      • Kernal64
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I really don’t get how so many people here are so happy that a Nazi is using Linux and doesn’t like Google anymore. That’s not the kind of clown I’d want representing or being a spokesperson for my interests and it’s really making me second guess the people here.

        Edit: @[email protected] 's comment has provided info I didn’t have, and recontextualizes the attitudes here I wasn’t understanding, so now I get why there’s support for this.

          • Kernal64
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1510 days ago

            Might wanna take your own advice. For example, instead of making a drive by shit post, you could have done what another commenter did and actually explain why people are on board with this guy. That person’s comment had me reconsider my position. Your comment just makes you look like an ass.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2510 days ago

        He got backlash from his own fans from all edgy and toxic jokes. I remember some of his Indian fans are angry for his PewDiePie vs T-series stuff (T-series: Indian music company).

        I think around 2019, he apologized and recognized all the edginess he did, and promised to do better.

        For the last five years, all of his content are basically wholesome family stuff or creative activities. Even his recent art journey video are widely shared among young art communities that’s not even his fans.

        • Kernal64
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 days ago

          I wasn’t aware of that, so thanks for the additional context!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Yeah this is why it’s so offputting seeing so much praise for him here. I don’t believe he’s ever outright apologized and owned up to what he’s said and done in the past (I could be wrong though?). Last I checked the dude was literally a neo nazi.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          he has. people just prefer to go on judging. how you supposed to feel good about yourself if the people you hate for hating stopped hating?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1610 days ago

          My wife was a PewDiePie fan from before the slur incident so I’ve loosely seen some of his content over the years. He’s apologized multiple times, and he’s shifted his style significantly multiple times since then.

          Basically in the last few years he’s grown up a ton. He married his girlfriend of a decade or more after earlier refusing marriage, had a baby, emigrated to Japan and now posts tons of creative and day-in-the-life style vlogs

          • socsa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 days ago

            Didn’t he stream a dead body in a Japanese suicide forest shortly after moving to Japan?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 days ago

              That was Logan Paul, and actually the Paul brothers’ antics actually greatly delayed Pewd’s immigration as the Japanese government actually stopped granting new visas to any social media personalitiws for some time after the Paul incidents.

              If I remember correctly he wasn’t able to immigrate until mid-2020 thanks to the Paul Borthers’ lack of respect for anyone

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1910 days ago

      started with minecraft & redstone, now linux & degoogling, can we extrapolate that in some years pewd’s gonna start hrt lol

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2110 days ago

      Same, it feels surreal.

      I was typing out in the comments that he should try nextcloud before I finished the video, and towards the end I saw that he was running Nextcloud. Fantastic

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        1910 days ago

        Let’s hope so.

        What’s next, Open source electric car? Building and living in an Earth Ship?

      • M137
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 days ago

        Is it though? I never paid any attention to him, so I only know that one time he made some kids make a sign with heil Hitler or something like that (which from what I’ve read was just a joke in bad taste, he isn’t a nazi or major racist). Otherwise, I haven’t heard anything bad about him, he was just never someone I cared to know more about and watch, seemed to be mostly for kids. Please, correct anything I’ve said if I’m wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 days ago

          He has had some serious run ins with controversy like the bridge incident and a shooter co-opting the T-Series fake beef but beyond that it’s basically people reacting seriously to him aping Filthy Frank, in my opinion I think he’s made good enough on not shooting himself in the foot now, mostly probably cuz he’s a Dad now and trying to ape Filthy Frank is too much effort.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 days ago

      There’s no redemption arc because he literally never did anything wrong. His content was always family friendly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1410 days ago

    That’s funny I’ve been DONE with poopoopie for a few years. Somehow people keep pushing this creep.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        Sure, but other platforms do exist, and he could post to those as well as YouTube. Other creators do, such as Gardiner Bryant to PeerTube and Louis Rossmann to Odyssee.

        If he really hated Google, wouldn’t he be motivated to invest his time into its competitors? Maybe he does, idk, I didn’t watch the video because I’m not a fan of his style and I generally try to avoid YouTube.

        • Noxy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          don’t make me tap the meme again

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 days ago

        Sure, but other platforms do exist, and he could post to those as well as YouTube. Other creators do, such as Gardiner Bryant to PeerTube and Louis Rossmann to Odyssee.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’m not sure how they would scale

          Also avoid Odyssee unless you are a nazis

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 days ago

            People keep saying they want an alternative to YouTube, but then reject every alternative that exists.

            Odyssee and other YouTube alternatives tend to host far right content because that content was banned on YouTube, so those creators flocked to the alternative platforms. The sites themselves aren’t exactly encouraging that content, it’s just where people end up due to the loose rules. The best way to fight extremism on an alternative platform is to post less extreme content and drown out the less desirable content.

            That’s basically what happened here on Lemmy. At the start, it was mostly tankies and far left extremists, and gradually it became more mainstream as more mainstream leftists ditched Reddit and joined Lemmy.

            If you want an alternative to YouTube to succeed, you need to use alternative platforms that already exist.

            • Possibly linux
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              In the case of Odyssee it was founded by a far right extremest. It also isn’t decentralized at all so you can’t easily stand up a different instance.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 days ago

                I assume you’re talking about Kauffman, who is the founder of LBRY, but that relationship ended when LBRY lost a lawsuit and Odysee was acquired. It is decentralized, using arweave for video hosting and a blockchain for video metadata.

                The main issue w/ Odysee is its near complete lack of moderation, which allows extremists, conspiracy theorists, and other undesirables to earn money. This is because Odysee gives creators the power to moderate their channels, unlike YouTube where most of that is reserved for the platform itself. Odysee is about as free-speech as you get, and that unfortunately allows less desirable content.

                My understanding is that Odysee is essentially what you get if you have P2P (not federated) PeerTube w/ a profit motive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4510 days ago

        Listen, we don’t read the article and we don’t watch the video before commenting. Maybe we’re reading the headline first. Maybe. This is the way and it has always been the way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1710 days ago

          To be fair, watching random YouTube videos can be demotivating. A transcript would be much nicer.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 days ago

            Yeah, I definitely prefer to not read some text as compared to not watching a video. If it’s just someone talking, it should’ve been an article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 days ago

          It’s also always been the way that the people who actually clicked the link get to come into the comments and be frustrated at us for being legitimately wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 days ago

          We will read the headline, and possibly every single word in it. Like 75% of the time, at least.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            maybe read the headline and the comments, but only like 30% before i react. I guess 75% for the headline maybe.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            I like to read until I hit a noun, then look to see what community this it was posted to, then kinda riff it from there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 days ago

          I agree it is that way currently, unfortunately, but it’s definitely a recent phenomenon (last 10y).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        Why would i feed youtube?
        Let me know when it’s on peertube, another video-centric platform.
        Lemmy’s text-centric.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        No you see, if you can’t do something absolutely perfect then why do it at all?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I’m sceptical of his steamdeck hosting solution :p hope he has backup for his files too

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 days ago

      Just block his name, I have trump and Elon and varations of their names black listed so posts with them don’t show up on my feed.

      • merde alors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        i have filters with elon musk, zuckerberg &c pewdeewhatever posts appeared in the last couple of days :/

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 days ago

          Oh no, 4 different posts that were posted on 4 different communities on 4 different instancess, all of which are about the topic he’s talking about in the video… The horror

          • merde alors
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            i didn’t subscribe to these communities to be notified about a youtuber’s latest clickbait!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 days ago

              This isn’t a random youtuber and his video isn’t clickbait. You not understanding why people are talking about him posting this video is not the same as these discussions being pointless or spam.

              • merde alors
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 days ago

                This isn’t a random youtuber and his video isn’t clickbait. You not understanding why people are talking about him posting this video is not the same as these discussions being pointless or spam.

                for your generation maybe?

                You’re right, i can’t understand how someone can make a name by streaming himself playing games and then become a reliable source for browser comparisons or linux. I can’t understand why anybody would like to watch someone else playing a “video game” either, but there is a whole generation that grew up with that. I have streamer neighbors. It’s not only that i can’t understand, but i think of these activities as pathetic.

                let’s end this useless conversation here. You can keep talking about him all your life, i prefer to filter him.

                There was an interesting podcast about mr.Beast on the Guardian this week. I was never interested in his videos either, I remember reading his Wikipedia page some years ago to understand what he’s about. For me, they’re both negligible symptoms of something going really wrong. Their analysis may be interesting, they on the other hand are not.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  “I’m incapable of understanding the nuance of someone with a lot of influence speaking out in favor of a topic I advocate for because I’m ignorant and judgemental towards certain activities and people who make a living off of them”

                  Yeah okay, bud. Good mentality you got there. But you’re right, this conversation is pointless, so let’s end it here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4710 days ago

      Imagine if some big influencers like him switched to peertube, that would be quiet a thing indeed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 days ago

        Even just mirroring.

        Is there a tool already that makes it easy to upload to both? Idk, I haven’t uploaded a video since like the 10s

      • GreenBottles
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1410 days ago

        It still baffles me why anyone likes him in the first place tbh

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 days ago

          I can kinda see it, though he’s not my cup of tea. I like my videos a bit more essay-like and a bit more serious mode.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 days ago

            Same here. There were times where my eyes went up just hearing mentions of the guy, but nowadays, there are some videos I kinda enjoy watching (rare but yea)

      • Björn Tantau
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 days ago

        Wait for it, I bet a whole bunch of people mentioned it in the comments of this one. That will probably be the topic of his next video. Although I’m hoping for stopkillinggames.com.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        I think they are the only people able to do something like that. Hosting videos is expensive as … you know. But if someone can do it, its them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        How about LBRY? Do you think it’s a sane alternative to YT? I also think peertube is the true freedom, though, I was surprised how quick videos load on odysee

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 days ago

          I though (not sure if I remember correctly) LBRY is basically dead after the lawsuits. The network was overtaken and is basically another corpo shait…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 days ago

          LBRY is cool but I’m honestly sketched out by the creators that currently exist there. It’s mostly weird libertarians and crypto bros plus random porn bots. Also between the first and most recent times I played with it they added a CDN that hosts all of the files and something like 99% of the data I downloaded while farting around on there came from that single official CDN, so very decentralized.

          Peertube has actual large creators who aren’t weird conservative podcasters, and tons of different servers already which serve content, and great Mastadon integration which puts it in a much better spot for growth moving forwards than LBRY. You can literally watch peertube videos from Mastadon (Which has millions of active users including some celebrities and government officials) and comment on them from Mastadon, so there’s kinda already a userbase measured in millions depending on how you classify cross-fediverse users

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 days ago

            mostly weird libertarians and crypto bros plus random porn bots

            Maybe yeah. In fact, the only video I’ve ever watched on LBRY is from a YouTuber named Mental Outlaw

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 days ago

        Any influencer that relies on YouTube ad money won’t make the full jump.

        Other than that, they’ll very quickly find out that keeping a video focused service running and serving 10k views daily (300k/mon) is very expensive both in storage and bandwidth.

        • Microw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 days ago

          The big youtubers rely on sponsorship money way more than ad money. But sponsorship money is dependent on viewership numbers, so that is the main issue

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 days ago

          They don’t make a large share of their income from yt ads I believe. Most is from sponsorships etc

        • Pup Biru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          59 days ago

          actually for big youtubers, ad revenue from google isn’t all that huge afaik. i’m going only on the LMG breakdown they did, but they only get 26% of their revenue from adsense… that’s no tiny share of course, but i wouldn’t call it completely catastrophic to loose

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 days ago

            you would have to factor in the amount of traffic that exposure from youtube gets them for those other monetary functions to get a real sense of how valuable it is to be or not be on that platform. Definitely feel like ethics should always come into play though and a lot of creators are branching out with hosting themselves or patreon/etc.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            You can look any youtuber up on socialblade and see their earnings range. It’s not small which goes to show his diversified stuff must make a shitload.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 days ago

      Can we stop with the narrative that corporations and celebrities are doing good? This guy is 110 Million people away from doing something for privacy and linux, once he makes 110 million and one person switch to linux or using a youtube alternative he will have done some work in the positive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 days ago

        I mean… glass half full or half empty… You can appreciate how enthusiastic he was about it and how many people saw the video, or you can just complain… Btw. if he should do more, it will be the positive feedback he gets about it, not the negative one which is just demotivating…

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I was actually kinda wondering the other day why super large content creators with good cash flow from what they already do, don’t ditch Google and Patreon or anything else that takes a cut to be nothing more than a middleman to accessing the content? They don’t need to host on the same level as YouTube; they could probably make more money hosting their videos on their own website, where they can control what is free or paid for, and can work directly with advertisers themselves.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1311 days ago

      Well, there is Nebula, which is kinda like that. But most of them also put their videos on YouTube, using Nebula as the premium ad-free option with a little bonus content.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 days ago

        I’m worried about Nebula’s business model being profitable enough to be sustainable in the long term but given their business model includes making every creator on the platform a part-owner of the platform that does limit how bad things can get

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 days ago

          From everything I’ve heard, they’re already profitable, and are explicitly choosing only to grow in a sustainable way, without taking on outside investment which could force them into enshittifying down the line. With a relative lack of need to show extreme growth, and a lack of reliance on outside factors like advertising (being subscription-based), the only major risk that I can see for them long-term is user churn. Which is definitely a risk, but with the ever-creeping growth of the range of content they have and (at least for now) an attitude of being customer-friendly, churn seems a relatively low risk.

          As far as I can see, at worst, the platform dies if the YouTube channels of the people on the platform die because of the YouTube algorithm, and they get bad churn (with fewer new subscribers because of the aforementioned dead YouTube channels at the top of the funnel), and they don’t get new more successful channels on before that happens. A scenario that’s far from unlikely, but which I would describe as “catastrophic, whether or not Nebula exists today”, so its existence for now as a hedge against more likely bad scenarios is still worthwhile.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            That’s super cool. I’d love to know more about Nebula’s business practices, do you know where I could find that information? I’ve seen some interviews with their leadership that didn’t go into anywhere near the depth that I’d like and that’s about it

            • Zagorath
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 days ago

              Most of this comment was my own speculation based on the details they’ve shared publicly. The details I know of publicly are:

              • The seem to be profitable. Or at least in a relatively sustainable place; they talk about profit a lot, but usually in terms of how the “profit” is split between creators. I forget, maybe the Wendover “history of Nebula” video from a while back talked more specifically about profitability?
              • They’re choosing not to take outside investment. This is something the CEO, Dave Wiskus, talked about particularly with respect to the Lifetime subscriptions, describing those as their option for building up the sort of large amounts of cash that they might otherwise have gone to outside investment for, in order to fund bigger projects
              • The fact that they are, quite visibly, expanding their range of content

              The rest was me speculating about how the business model would seem to work based on those factors plus my limited, layperson’s, understanding of their industry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      hosting their videos on their own website

      I love that entrepreneurial attitude. If an online service is unsatisfactory, just develop your own software from the ground up and provision the infrastructure from your pocket. Car industry sucks? Just build your own car! GPU prices high? Grab a soldering iron and a handful of sand, how hard could it be?

      Things are always more complex than they appear. The whole point of services like Youtube and Patreon is to offload that complexity onto the provider in exchange for a fee (or some other form of compensation) from the user. Just look at how many early Lemmy instances have gone offline because of the overwhelming financial or administrative burden. Hate the companies all you like, and by all means look for independent solutions, but don’t pretend they offer no value whatsoever.

      • y0kai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 days ago

        There are open source alternatives that already exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1311 days ago

      Streaming video is expensive. LTT did it with Floatplane, even going so far as to develop their own backend. Watcher and some other YouTubers did it with Vimeo as their backend, but Vimeo still takes a large cut.

      At the end of the day, people are doing this, but YouTube still offers a compelling value compared to other platforms. It’s hard to beat their scale, sophistication, and the discoverability of their platform.

      • Microw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 days ago

        Yeah I know some big german youtubers who years ago were like “we need to be more independent from youtube” and set up their own website. Every year the costs for hosting that would take out a huge cut of their earnings, so at the start of 2025 they finally gave up and said they couldnt pour even more money into that project as it simply wasnt profitable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      40
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      And how do they get big? How do they get discovered? SEO ?

      They’re getting huge because of the platform.

      I’m not saying google is not evil but it literally gives them their audience.

      I watch YT more than anything else by a mile, and if my top subscription moved to their website, and I had to jump through hoops to watch them on my TV device, by installing a browser or something I probably would stop watching them or watch them way less. Another TV friendly app sure that wouldn’t be a problem, but I don’t see many doing that.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I’m talking about those who have already gotten big, like PewDiePie or Good Mythical Morning (the latter of which started on their own website before youtube even existed, btw). Not the dude who just started a channel last week and has nothing to do shit with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2010 days ago

          The lift of running your own platform is big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to creating your own video hosting platform.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            It’s not that challenging with a partner to help manage infrastructure which even at his scale is not going to cost an obscene amount of money.

            Edit: there’s a very massive difference between a single content creator hosting their content and a site hosting everyone’s content like YouTube as well in terms of cost, infrastructure, security and management.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 days ago

            Websites work very well and are scalable af. A plugged in person with a track record like that could go Web 2.0 and probably net more.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              610 days ago

              You are correct. Websites, the stack to supply video encoding, even scalability is a solved problem.

              The hard work isn’t technical, it’s getting people onto your platform in the first place (marketing), getting people to continue using your platform (retention) and the perennial problems of SaaS evolving with other SaaS platforms (how many dev hours are you willing to eat trying to keep up with the Joneses?).

              SaaS, and in this case, SaaS offering content, is a losing game. You will either lose your shirt, sell your business, or become entrenched in a position whose inertia is difficult to break. How much of any of those you are willing to take a firehose of is the question.

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 days ago

                It’s not easy, but you’re not guaranteed to end up

                either lose your shirt, sell your business, or become entrenched in a position whose inertia is difficult to break

                It depends on the personalities involved and the business model they go with.

                Nebula has done really well with consistent growth as a premium offering where people pay one subscription fee to get ad-free videos from exclusively high-quality creators across a quote broad range of niches, in addition to bonus extras and Nebula Originals.

                Dropout seems to have a lot of success with a range of mostly unscripted comedy, centred around a core cast of trusted comedic actors with a larger range of guests.

                Floatplane, on the other hand, seems much less successful, probably owing to its business model being basically Patreon’s, but only for video. Instead of the wide range of content you get for surprisingly reasonable amounts of Nebula and Dropout, Floatplane ends up looking very expensive if you want to support more than one or two creators. Plus the creators on it haven’t got the same degree of trust; it ends up reeking of the sort of techbro vibes that people are explicitly trying to get away from.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  210 days ago

                  I’m sure these are accurate statements, but the fact remains that I’ve never heard of dropout or nebula. At all.

                  And the only reason I’ve heard of floatplane is via LTT and Jeff Geerling, and I don’t actually use the platform itself.

                  That’s what I mean about inertia, google has it now and can coast for years on people just being lazy and staying with YouTube. That alone will be a loooong hill to climb for any other platforms.

                  LTT seems to have enough clout and has worked out a survivable business model, but notice that they remain on YouTube to capture and keep new views.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 days ago

          YouTube still offers them a service in directing them new viewers. The big creators all lose viewers but YouTube funnels replacement views faster than they lose. They could host their own videos but they are gonna see very little growth without Google either in search or with YouTube as they start to lose the base that followed them.

          They also won’t be able to negotiate as good as rates for pre-rolls or in video sponsorships as if they were on YouTube.

          The only real alternative would be to band together like the creators that are a part of nebula are doing. Hosting on peertube really isn’t an option unless you are independently supported and you are doing it as a passion project and don’t care about audience growth or retention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 days ago

          Still think building their own site with apps I can throw on my devices is pretty involved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        Yeah, even an established creator is going to have a hard time moving their audience.

        If YouTube weren’t a near monopoly it would be different. Then other companies would be competing for creators.

        Making it worse is section 1201 of the DMCA. It makes it a crime to circumvent access controls. In the past, Facebook was able to grow by providing tools to interface with MySpace. People didn’t have to abandon their MySpace friends, they could communicate with them through Facebook, and Facebook could ensure that messages sent on its platform arrived to people still on MySpace. But, if you tried that today Facebook has access controls in place that make that a crime. The same applies to YouTube. Nobody can build a seamless “migrate away from YouTube” experience because YouTube will use the DMCA to block them.

        The governments of the world need to bring back antitrust with teeth and force interoperability.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 days ago

      Putting a video file somewhere and letting 10,000 people watch it at the same time is no small feat.

      You could probably get away with doing it on peer tube but it has no facilities to lock people out or make them pay.

      Even if you don’t use patreon for payments payments aren’t free.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 days ago

      Literally all of them have tried at some point. But honestly you just end up with a bunch of effectively streaming services that you have to pay for.

      I already have hbo, Netflix, krangle + and Hulu and YouTube and now I need «randomyoutuber+» x10 too?

      Yeah no thanks

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Download the video before YouTube takes it down. I want to see that site flooded with reuploads if they do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1611 days ago

      I don’t care about his content, but I downloaded for historical preservation. If you’re willing to watch can you explain the beef?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1810 days ago

        I just use down sub to pull the transcript from his video It’s only 60% as annoying.

        He has the normal privacy versus cost worries which are reasonably valid. Then he rambles on, plugs a product that he’s shilling that’s unrelated to the subject matter, says he’s replacing Google search with a local LLM, does some hot takes on alternatives, does some reasonable takes on some alternatives.

        To be honest, this is probably the least helpful de-googling video I’ve seen, other than the fact that he’s a major influencer and is telling everyone they should be doing it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1010 days ago

          this is probably the least helpful de-googling video

          I don’t think it was supposed to be particularly helpful. It’s more of him sharing his passion with his audience. Which isn’t going to be interesting if you don’t care about him.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 days ago

            Entirely fair, I generally can’t stand him, hence just reading his caption data :)

            He hit the mark on a few things but his hot takes were pretty hot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4910 days ago

      It will stay up. Do you know how many YouTube videos there are badmouthing Google? They don’t care so long as you’re watching them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 days ago

        All I know is they took down the ones by LTT and Jeff Geerling, I can only assume it was due to the larger audience those two attracted. Now imagine PewDiePie…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1110 days ago

          Linus did 3 videos on “how to degoogle your life” and only 1 was taken down. That one told people how to circumvent YouTube’s platform and monetary system which violated the community guidelines.

    • SavvyWolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 days ago

      If it stays up, it’s certainly going to be interesting seeing the difference in view counts between it and his other videos.

    • sk1nnym1ke
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      1111 days ago

      Upload it to Framatube and other YouTube Alternatives