• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    58
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    What’s hilarious to me is that OP has a deliberate “this is only about one situation” and then defends how the other obvious situation isn’t that.

    From a .ml user.

    Curious.

    Now I’m no supporter of genocide by anyone, and definitely not a Zionist, but it’s strange how when talking about Israel (by this user) there is nothing else, in fact you’ll be argued down by them if you see this comic as talking about anything but what they think.

    Anyways….

    This comic is about the USA.

    This comic is about Canada.

    This comic is about Australia.

    This comic is about basically every African nation, South Africa especially.

    This comic is about Russia, this comic is about the Soviet Union.

    This comic is about Israel.

    This comic is about a number of current conflicts.

    This comic is about a number of past conflicts.

    This comic is about raw Kalkite being mined from Gorman.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I didn’t realize you were both sidesing the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Nor that Russia was doing settler colonialism. Very wise of you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Nor that Russia was doing settler colonialism.

        Ah. It’s just a good old annexation. That’s totally fine.

        I’ll remember that when my stupid country makes an attempt to annex Canada… Which is not invading their home, because it’s not settler colonialism?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            …Okay.

            First of, of course I would. What would make you think I wouldn’t? I’m upset with how many civilians are dying now. And I’m upset with genocides elsewhere.

            Second. How does that stop this meme from applying to Russia/Ukraine?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Because third panel wants to live in their house not take over their country

                Again. I will remember this when the US more seriously talks up ‘taking over’ Canada; but not living in their house. Not a crisis of imperialist aggression, by that argument, unless you wish to clarify?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      145 days ago

      What does Israel have to do with this? It’s obviously a Ukraine/Russia meme. Stop trying to make everything about your pet issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        My dude I think you’re misunderstanding me and this post, read the comments and then come back and see if you can take my meaning.

        The OP is making a point of saying this isn’t about Russia/Ukraine in any way and how can we even be so dumb as to think that.

        Your criticism ought to be aimed at OP, Israel IS their pet project

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 days ago

    Don’t forget the sequel: “you just don’t understand the history of this region house, honestly you’re coming into this discussion way too late, the nuance of this conflict has just been going on so long it’s hard to tell who’s at fault.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    105 days ago

    Still waiting for the “Defed yourself from .ml” feature. Every day It’s something to do with Gaza or “Loss” always popping up on my feed. Do we really need comics for this?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      155 days ago

      Instead of crying for mommy and daddy admin to defederate from the ‘.ml badthink’ and build your uncritical hug box for everyone else, you can always block the instance as a whole client side. That why we left Reddit, you are in control of your experience

      Or just keep scrolling and stow the comment instead of demanding others change, but maybe I’m a weirdo idk

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          55 days ago

          There’s daylight between

          I want them to shadowban the badthink for me

          And

          Maybe curate your own whitelist instead?

          But again, idk I’m the weirdo obviously. Plz mods, defed from all outsider thought to keep us ideologically pure 🙏

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 days ago

      While I understand the compulsion to ignore and distract oneself from the ever growing list of atrocities around the world, I find it to be a personal responsibility to maintain rather than a public obligation to protect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    435 days ago

    I suppose Russia’s invasion is definitely imperialism, but I don’t see anyone saying both sides are at fault.

            • irelephant [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              45 days ago

              I don’t think lemmy is worthwhile botting, I think they’re severly misguided people though. Or people who read a variety of liberal/conservative media to “get a view of both sides” and ignore leftist stuff as “too extreme”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Russia claims that their invasion is justified because ukraine supposedly massacred Russians… Ukranians who are russian according to russia…

      If you were to take the middle rode somehow for some reason you would decry both sides as in the wrong

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
            link
            fedilink
            English
            405 days ago

            They are attempting to do the same thing, to erase the national identity of the people living there and conquer the place.

            Even the settlement thing matches, the Soviets used to move Russians into all the republics to erase national boundaries and make them all uniformly Russian.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Settler Colonialism means murdering the civilians and then stealing their land and house. Not trying to force your own culture upon civilians.

              Examples are America, Australia, Nazi Germany, Apartheid South Africa, Israel, etc.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                40
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                murdering the civilians and then stealing their land and house

                Yes, exactly like what Russia is doing to Ukraine, too.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  45 days ago

                  Russia is trying to annex Ukraine. We’re not talking about off-cases but national policy.

                  Or do you believe that Russia wants to expell all Ukrainians from Ukraine?

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              25 days ago

              I suggest looking up the difference between conquering and colonizing. Russia is trying to annex Ukraine into Russia, not make it a client state.

              And then look up what settler colonialism is. Because if it was that, then those Ukrainians wouldn’t be in occupied territory anymore.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 days ago

                How about you finish that sentence first a change?

                Russia is trying to annex Ukraine into Russia-

                … against the will of Ukraine.

                Which means…….?

              • Frezik
                link
                fedilink
                24 days ago

                A very important distinction that is clearly not just splitting hairs.

            • Frezik
              link
              fedilink
              23 days ago

              The quality of tankies has really gone down. This one started tried to make a really big deal about the difference between annexation and settler colonialism, as if that matters at all. I’m only disappointed that most replies fell into the obvious trap.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            315 days ago

            Good thing Hitler just wanted to annex the Sudetenland and not colonize it, he would have been a pretty bad guy otherwise

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              65 days ago

              No Hitler did settler colonialism. In Europe. He threw the natives in ovens and stole their house.

              That’s why Hitler is regarded as the ultimate evil. He did settler colonialism against white people.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                265 days ago

                Yep, that’s why Hitler is regarded as the ultimate evil, the settler colonialism.

                The Anschluss and the annexation of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia were both justified under the guise of protecting and uniting ethnic Germans in the regions, Hitler even said he’d totally, for realsies stop after that. But I wouldn’t expect .ml’ers to care about anything that happened before the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact broke down.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Remember when Russia and Hitler teamed up to split Europe?

                  Shocking how the impetus for the war in Ukraine is almost identical for Hitler needing to invade the Sudetenland.

                  Anyways, can we stay on topic about Rampart Israel?

                  I can’t believe Geneva is claiming it was “white genocide/colonialism” that is why Hitler is evil.

                  I mean I can believe they’re doing it, given the account is a propaganda front … but god damn that’s wild.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  55 days ago

                  Like this?

                  A few weeks after the Wehrmacht’s March 1939 occupation of all Czechoslovakia, and despite increasing doubts about Western intentions, Stalin again approached the Franco-British powers.

                  On 16 April 1939, he submitted a formal proposition: a three-power military pact with the obvious goal of deterring Nazi aggression.

                  Stalin’s diplomatic proposal mirrored the agreement in place prior to the First World War, in which Britain, France and Russia were bound together in an alliance directed against the German and Austro-Hungarian empires.

                  Had Stalin’s approach been accepted, it can only have changed the course of history – as such a union would have ensured, right from the beginning in the event of a conflict, that Hitler faced a nightmare war on two fronts.

                  This final Soviet offer of alliance with the West was snubbed, however, with the British in particular treating Moscow with disregard. Strong anti-Bolshevik feelings were widespread amongst the conservatives in the British government, and with Chamberlain himself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    85 days ago

    I don’t know of any cases of imperialism recently, though I see what appear to be conflicts incorrectly framed as such.

    For example, many say this about the Israeli/Arab conflict. However, this conflict is thousands of years old. The Israelis solidly lost a war to keep their land in the BC era, then after WWII, leaders decided to undo the loss, again by force. Predictably, the Arabs, having lived there for thousands of years now (since they were Babylonians!) were not happy. It is not simple.

    The Israeli return may have been orchestrated by the imperial powers, but I would argue this is not imperialism or even a bad thing. Consider the colonial invasion of the Americas. That was clearly imperialism because my ancestors had never lived there, and had no claim to the land. We just wanted it. At best, we thought we could make better use of it than the natives. That was not the case with Israel, whose ancestors largely were the natives.

    Of course, persecuting Palestinians is wrong. Imagine if thousands of years from now, the American Indians, supported by the international community, forced Americans to adopt their customs and religion or leave. That would not be right either, even though maybe they should have their land back!

    We need to share in these cases, and are unfortunately bad at sharing.

    .

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The Israelis solidly lost a war to keep their land in the BC era, then after WWII, leaders decided to undo the loss, again by force.

      [snip]

      That was clearly imperialism because my ancestors had never lived there, and had no claim to the land. We just wanted it. At best, we thought we could make better use of it than the natives. That was not the case with Israel, whose ancestors largely were the natives.

      Absolutely fucking unhinged.

      You can’t get kicked out of a land 2000 years ago and claim you’re still the natives. Israel has 0 claim to the land aside from their religious mythos, and the “christians” are supporting this for similar reasons since their mythos suggests that the second coming is after Israel holds the land.

      AT BEST this is imperialism using religion as the excuse (you know, fairly standard imperialism). But claiming it’s not imperialism is still carrying water for a genocidal ethnostate trying to handwave away the fact they’re stealing land and slaughtering natives while still trying to play the victim.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
          link
          fedilink
          English
          385 days ago

          Except Russia also did and is doing settler colonialism, inasmuch they have been moving Ukrainians out and Russians into Ukraine for the past century at least, as they did with other Soviet republics, as they are doing to neighbouring states, with the aim of eroding their national identity.

          Just like they are doing now. The only marginal difference is that there are not enough Ukrainians to alter electoral balances, and Russia would be able to dissolve the population of Ukraine via forced relocations instead of just killing them all. Both are genocide by the way.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            65 days ago

            Is Russia trying to exterminate Ukrainian people in the annexed regions and replace them with Russian settlers?

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Elaborate. You too @[email protected] Have there been mass deaths of civilians in Russian-occupied areas? Are they segregating the population or practicing apartheid based on ethnicity? Are they sterilizing Ukainians? Have marriages between Russians and Ukrainians been outlawed?

                What kind of extermination campaign are they running? I’m not seeing it, besides relocating children out of the war zone. I suppose that could be argued as ethnic cleansing, but it can also be justified as protecting children from war so this alone isn’t enough imo

                • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  44 days ago

                  Are they segregating the population or practicing apartheid based on ethnicity?

                  As an example, they are declaring the homes of war refugees abandoned, and are giving it to Russians, specifically excluding Ukrainians.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  It’s not ethnic cleansing in your book, but who cares? It is according to the ICC, which is why there’s an arrest warrant for Putin for ethnic cleansing.

                  In the past nights Russia fired thousands of rockets and drones at civilian targets. The only reason Ukraine doesn’t entirely look like Gaza (and some parts do) is because of the population density and the air defense systems.

                • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  84 days ago

                  That they are not merely trying to make Ukraine Russian-aligned.

                  They are trying to move 5 million Russians into Ukrainian territory, and have confiscated tens of thousands of homes after making their owners war refugees and are giving them to Russians.

                  They have kidnapped tens of thousands of Ukrainian children, and they are not just educating them to be Ukrainians accepting Russian rule, but they want to completely Russify them as a further attempt of erasing the Ukrainian nation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      For example, many say this about the Israeli/Arab conflict. However, this conflict is thousands of years old. The Israelis solidly lost a war to keep their land in the BC era

      This is incredibly historically illiterate on multiple fronts. The Israeli/Palestine conflict only dates back to 1948, with precursors in 1930s. First, Israel wasn’t lost to “Arabs” in “the BC”. The Babylonians were not Arab and the exile of Jews in the 6th century BC were cultural elites and not the broader population. It was part of an attempt to assimilate Judah into the broader Babylon empire. That was defeated by the Persian empire and Judeans were allowed to return to Judea (now Southern Israel). The traditional idea of the beginning of the Diaspora was the destruction of the second temple in 70 AD and the violent expulsion of parts of Jerusalem by the Romans. Though the vast majority of the real diaspora was from immigrants to major Roman cities predating the destruction of the Second Temple and not Jerusalem exiles.

      The majority of people that were living in what is now considered Israel were not Arab invaders, but the native peoples that have always lived there that, after the Arab conquest of the 8th century, started to speak Arabic and convert to Islam. The difference between a Mizrahi Jew and a Palestinian is most likely whether one of their ancestors converted to Islam in the last 13 centuries.

      Not that Iron Age Philistines, Samaritans, Canaanites, etc. were secret proto-muslims secretly waiting for the Romans to purge Jews so that two millennia later “real Arabs” could occupy the “promised land”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        That’s an interesting and far more detailed view of the situation. To summarize, various people came and were violently expelled. As a matter of virtue, I disagree with violent expulsion. Also as a matter of virtue, I believe people who once lived an area should be allowed to exist there in peace. These two virtues are in tension at this part of the world.

        Just as I believe it’s right for the Israelis to be there, as the first people in the area, it’s right for the Palestinians (and more general Arab groups with roots in the area) to be-- they have a stake too. It’s wrong to steal land from people living on it and to make their lives difficult. It was wrong thousands of years ago, wrong in the '40s, and is wrong today. You shouldn’t need to be Jewish to vote there or have rights. That’s horrible, from my western individualistic lens.

        My goal here was to comment on the absurdity of this cycle, specifically the extremist viewpoints that one side or another should be entirely removed from the area. I tried to illustrate that with the Native American example. These groups of people need to put the violence aside and figure out how to live together. Other countries need to stop picking favorites and avoid going beyond promoting lasting peace and mutual respect in the region.

        Excuse my uncareful wording-- I took a lot more time to write this post. Hopefully it is more precise and clear.