• Hanrahan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 days ago

    We really should have inheritance ax, over say $3Mil, taxed at say 95%. You’re dead, you don’t need it.

    Oligarchs carrying foward should really be intolerable, inequality is the death of a civilised society.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 days ago

      So say i own a house and my wife owns a house and we hit the 3 million dollar mark in land value in 40 years,

      You think that 95 percent of that should go back to the government rather then or children?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 days ago

        Taxes like that typically apply only to money beyond the limit so if you hit 3 million and a dollar you would be paying 95 cents in tax on that dollar only.

      • hazel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 days ago

        Not sure whether it changes anything for you, but I think they’re proposing that each dollar past the 3 million be taxed at 95%. Both the 3 and the 95 being spitball numbers, of course. I’m not confident that 3 million will be worth much at all in 40 years anyway.

  • Joshi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 days ago

    This comes up periodically and is absolutely true, judged as a liberal economy Australia is generally quite efficiently run with below average taxes and above average services. Which is no excuse for not trying to do better and indeed think outside the liberal box.

    More interesting is that the graph “Breakdown of total tax raised in Australia since WWII” under “Other taxes” there is a spike in 1951. It seems to correlate with the USA stockpiling wool as part of their strategic reserve and a subsequent speculative bubble.

    https://www.winton.com/news/australias-lesser-known-commodities-booms

    https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/185564703

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 days ago

    The highest marginal tax rate for income earners is over 50%. And it takes effect at much lower incomes than other comparable countries.

    Increasing the GST would cause double taxation, as people who earnt money at a higher income tax rate then spend that money at a time when there’s a higher consumption tax.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 days ago

      Increasing GST during a cost of living crisis would also just be insane. It ends up being a bigger burden on the poor than the rich. Increasing the cost of a shop at the supermarket right now would not go down well with the electorate.

    • Joshi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The highest marginal tax rate for income earners is over 50%. And it takes effect at much lower incomes than other comparable countries.

      In Australia? The highest marginal tax rate is 45%, and due to the nature of progressive taxation unless you have an absurdly high income most of the income of even high earners is taxed at a lower rate.

      Source: I am in the top tax bracket and until recently did my own taxes

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        45% income tax, plus 2% Medicare levy, plus the incremental tax added as you move from no div 293 to full div 293. Plus you’re paying 10% GST on the things you buy. When you add all these together, earning an extra $100 can net you less than $50. You can see it when you play around with paycalculator.com.au

          • Joshi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 days ago

            I’m not going to spend my afternoon doing calculations to prove my point as what is required is doing the same calculations for other nations, the number you’re quoting is not what is meant by marginal tax rate for a start but the linked article provides the context needed.

            Again, I have been in the top tax bracket for around a decade and have never paid more than 40% of my taxable income in tax without an accountant

            Australia has lower sales taxes, lower income taxes, no requirement for private or employee provided health insurance. It is straightforwardly untrue that Australia is high taxing. Even if it were true then the level of public services provided would make it worthwhile.

            Maybe the top tax rate kicks in lower but the tax free threshold is also higher than in most countries which is the correct balance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 days ago

              Marginal tax rate is the tax rate you pay on each additional dollar earnt. The fact that the Australian government hides some of the taxes doesn’t mean you don’t pay them or that they’re not part of the marginal tax rate.

              • stib
                link
                fedilink
                32 days ago

                @DavidDoesLemmy
                But you’re only paying that tax on the income above the threshold for that tax bracket. Rich people, and their dupes whinging about Australia’s “high taxes” can get in the bin.
                @HalfEarthMedic

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  124 hours ago

                  Yes, I understand. My comment was about marginal tax rate. It is true that marginal tax rate can go up to 58%

    • ikt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      The highest marginal tax rate for income earners is over 50%. And it takes effect at much lower incomes than other comparable countries.

      I’m interested which countries?